{"id":330064,"date":"2024-09-04T17:00:49","date_gmt":"2024-09-04T11:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=330064"},"modified":"2024-09-09T16:56:44","modified_gmt":"2024-09-09T11:26:44","slug":"dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a suit filed by the plaintiff seeking to prevent the defendant from releasing any sequels of Aashiqui, in particular, the third part tentatively titled &#8220;Aashiqui 3&#8221; \/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221; \/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221;, without the plaintiff&#8217;s express consent, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjeev Narula, J.<\/span>, stated that permitting the defendant to use a deceptively similar title, especially given the existing public anticipation of a third instalment of the Aashiqui Franchise, would infringe the plaintiff&#8217;s trade mark rights by misleading consumers and diluting the brand identity of the Aashiqui Franchise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff&#8217;s favour, restraining the defendant, and\/or anybody acting on their behalf, from using the title &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221; \/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221; and\/or any other name \/ title which uses the mark &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221;, in respect of their proposed film.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Vishesh Films Private Limited, the plaintiff, was an Indian film production house, under the leadership of Mukesh Bhatt, and they were known for producing commercially successful films with popular music. Further, Super Cassettes Industries Limited, the defendant was founded by Late Gulshan Kumar in 1983 and was popularly known to be doing business as &#8216;T-Series&#8217;, an Indian music record label and film production company. After the demise of Mr. Gulshan Kumar, the company has been taken over by his son, Mr. Bhushan Kumar. Over the years, they were in the business of acquiring soundtracks and publishing them on various online, digital, television and other platforms, in addition to producing movies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 01-01-1990, the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant for co-production of the first instalment of the Aashiqui Franchise. The said agreement had various clauses dealt with joint ownership of all rights in the film between the parties, except music. Thereafter, a success of Aashiqui, the parties entered into another agreement dated 21-12-2011 (&#8216;2011 Agreement&#8217;) to jointly produce another film titled Aashiqui 2. Upon its release on 26-04-2013, this second instalment also achieved considerable commercial success, earning over INR 100 crores.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In view of the agreements, the first two films in the Aashiqui Franchise were jointly owned, credited and produced between the plaintiff and defendant. These agreements continued to govern the relationship between the parties in respect of any film associated with the Aashiqui Franchise, including any prequel, sequel or re-make, as provided in the 2011 Agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Plaintiff alleged that their proprietary rights in the film franchise &#8216;Aashiqui&#8217; were being violated by the defendant, despite the existence of joint ownership under the agreements executed between the parties. The plaintiff asserted their rights over the trade marks &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; and &#8220;Aashiqui Ke Liye&#8221;, was registered under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (&#8216;the TM Act&#8217;), with usage claimed since 1990 and 2014, respectively. Based on these rights, the plaintiff sought to prevent the defendant from releasing any sequels, in particular, the third instalment tentatively titled &#8220;Aashiqui 3&#8221;\/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221;\/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221;, without their express consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The defendant admitted joint ownership over the Aashiqui Franchise, but categorically denied any intention to produce another instalment of the Aashiqui Franchise or create any derivative works based on the cinematographic films Aashiqui and Aashiqui 2. The defendant asserted that the title of their proposed movie &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221;\/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221; was not similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s registered trade mark or a sequential title. Therefore, there was no possibility of public confusion. The defendant further undertook that their film would be entirely distinct from the films in the Aashiqui Franchise, and it should have no sequential linkage and not be a continuation\/ adaptation\/ derivative of the previous films.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the defendant&#8217;s challenge to the rights asserted by the plaintiff in their trade mark &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; on the grounds that it was both generic and common to trade within the film industry, the Court stated that a generic term could not function as a trademark because it did not distinguish the source of the goods or services. However, unlike generic terms, a term that was common to trade might still acquire distinctiveness if it was closely associated with a particular source and had not become so diluted that it lost its ability to identify that source.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that a word like &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221;, might suggest a theme of romance, but it could not be said to exhaustively describe the full spectrum of a film&#8217;s narrative, which might include love, violence, hatred, and a myriad of other human emotions and experiences. In trademark law, a mere suggestive term could still function as a valid trade mark. Therefore, &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; was prima facie not a mere descriptive term but rather a distinctive mark that suggested a specific brand of romantic films, capable of being protected under trade mark law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the title &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; had been used consistently by the plaintiff, in collaboration with the defendant, in connection with their series of successful films. Consequently, the word &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; had prima facie acquired strong reputation and goodwill which was closely associated with a particular brand of romantic cinema produced by the parties jointly. Therefore, even if the question of whether &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; had acquired secondary meaning was to be determined at the stage of trial, the Court prima facie opined that &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; was not generic, as it did not describe a general category of goods but rather served as a distinctive identifier of the Aashiqui Franchise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the fact that the plaintiff had not sued every third-party who had used the term &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; in some form would not in itself diminish the strength or validity of their trademark. The plaintiff&#8217;s decision to prioritize action against the defendant, who was using the term in a way that directly impacted the plaintiff&#8217;s established brand, was both strategic and legally sound. Therefore, the Court opined that the title &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; was neither generic nor common to trade. It was a suggestive mark that had acquired distinctiveness and goodwill through its association with the successful Aashiqui Franchise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the issue that whether there was a likelihood of confusion among the public regarding defendant&#8217;s proposed film and plaintiff&#8217;s Aashiqui franchise, the Court stated that the title &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221;\/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221; prominently featured the word &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; as its dominant and most distinctive element. The word &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221;, in the title of a film, was immediately recognizable to the public as being associated with the highly successful romantic film series. This association was not incidental and was built through years of significant commercial success. Further, the addition of the words &#8220;Tu Hi&#8221; and &#8220;Hai&#8221; did not significantly alter the overall impression of the title, particularly when viewed through the lens of imperfect recollection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court prima facie opined that the phonetic and conceptual similarities in the marks, combined with the likelihood of confusion among the target audience, supported the conclusion that the defendant&#8217;s use of the title infringed upon the plaintiff&#8217;s trade mark rights. Therefore, it was evident that &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221;\/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221; was deceptively similar to &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221;. Thus, the Court stated that the plaintiff&#8217;s case would be covered under Section 29(1) read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563671\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">29(2)(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">TM Act<\/a>. Even if it was assumed that there was no confusion as to the source of service, at the very least, there was likelihood of confusion regarding association, sponsorship, endorsement etc. Therefore, the plaintiff&#8217;s claim of deceptive similarity was well-founded, and the defendant&#8217;s title should be restrained to protect the Plaintiff&#8217;s established brand.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the disclaimer and the undertaking would not serve any purpose considering the strong public association already established with the &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; title. The Court noted the defendant&#8217;s contention that the plaintiff had acquired the term &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; by not taking action against the film &#8216;Chandigarh Kare Aashiqui&#8217;, which was produced by the Defendant, and stated that the trade mark owners were not obligated to take action against every possible infringement, especially when the risk of confusion was minimal or when the title in question contains distinctive elements that clearly differentiated it from the protected mark. The Court stated that the plaintiff and the defendant the as assumed joint owners would still have the obligation to ensure that the trade mark &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; was used in a way that maintains its integrity and did not lead to public confusion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that permitting the defendant to use a deceptively similar title, especially given the existing public anticipation of a third instalment of the Aashiqui Franchise, would infringe the plaintiff&#8217;s trade mark rights by misleading consumers and diluting the brand identity of the Aashiqui Franchise. Thus, the Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff&#8217;s favour, restraining the defendant, and\/or anybody acting on their behalf, from using the title &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui&#8221;\/ &#8220;Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai&#8221; and\/or any other name\/ title which uses the mark &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221;, in respect of their proposed film.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter would next be listed on 03-10-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Vishesh Films (P) Ltd. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eH2UIh87\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 6117<\/a>, decided on 02-09-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Pravin Anand, Dhruv Anand, Udit Patro, Sampurna Sanyal, Nimrat Singh and Dhananjay Khanna, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Defendant:<\/span> Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Harsh Kaushik, Shumi Wasandi and Sachin Akhoury, Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"trade marks act, 1999\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-296380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The term &#8220;Aashiqui&#8221; does not describe the general category of goods or services (films) but instead functions as a distinctive brand identifier for the Aashiqui Franchise.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[72769,52955,2543,2943,68785,72772,54302,2616,42104,72770,72771],"class_list":["post-330064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-aashiqui-franchise","tag-deceptively-similar","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-injunction","tag-justice-sanjeev-narula","tag-mukesh-bhatt","tag-t-series","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-trade-marks-act","tag-tu-hi-aashiqui","tag-tu-hi-aashiqui-hai"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DHC grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff\u2019s favour, restraining the defendant from using the title which uses the mark \u201cAashiqui\u201d, in respect of their proposed film.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff\u2019s favour, restraining the defendant from using the title which uses the mark \u201cAashiqui\u201d, in respect of their proposed film.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-04T11:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-09T11:26:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/\",\"name\":\"DHC grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-04T11:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-09T11:26:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff\u2019s favour, restraining the defendant from using the title which uses the mark \u201cAashiqui\u201d, in respect of their proposed film.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff\u2019s favour, restraining the defendant from using the title which uses the mark \u201cAashiqui\u201d, in respect of their proposed film.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff\u2019s favour, restraining the defendant from using the title which uses the mark \u201cAashiqui\u201d, in respect of their proposed film.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-04T11:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-09T11:26:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/","name":"DHC grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-04T11:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-09T11:26:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in the plaintiff\u2019s favour, restraining the defendant from using the title which uses the mark \u201cAashiqui\u201d, in respect of their proposed film.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/dhc-grants-interim-injunction-against-t-series-from-using-aashiqui-title-in-their-proposed-film\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against T-Series from using \u201cAashiqui\u201d title in their proposed film"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/03\/ipr-roundup-top-intellectual-property-rights-cases-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":330064,"position":0},"title":"IPR Roundup 2024: The Most Game-Changing Intellectual Property Rights Cases of the Year","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Discover the year's most impactful IPR cases, including landmark decisions on copyright infringements, trademark conflicts, patent disputes, and more, shaping the future of intellectual property law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 IPR cases","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/hc-weekly-roundup-september-2024-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330064,"position":1},"title":"HIGH COURTS SEPTEMBER 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Read latest updates on T-series; Haldwani Violence; Service and Employment Laws; Cruelty on husband; and more","author":"Editor","date":"September 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Take a quick glance at what the High Courts were discussing in this late Monsoon season.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"HIGH COURTS SEPTEMBER 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":330064,"position":2},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/16\/delhi-hc-restrains-hi-tech-pvt-ltd-from-using-the-marks-hta-or-ars-hta-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":330064,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Hi Tech Private Limited from using the marks HTA or ARS-HTA","author":"Editor","date":"August 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cthere is no requirement, in law, of a mark having to be registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the fact of non-registration is, at best, an extremely weak ground on which user of the mark can be doubted.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-lifelong-online-retail-p-ltd-for-its-mark-lifelong-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":330064,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Lifelong Online Retail (P) Ltd for its mark \u2018Lifelong\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court restrained the defendant from dealing in any goods, under the impugned trade mark \u2018Lifelong\u2019 or any other mark as may be identical to or deceptively similar with the plaintiff's (Lifelong Online Retail (P) Ltd.) registered trade mark \u2018Lifelong\u2019, to cause infringement of the plaintiff's trade marks.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":288536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/05\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-google-llc-for-its-mark-google-and-awards-rs-10-lakhs-as-damages-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-case-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":330064,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Google LLC for its mark \u201cGOOGLE\u201d and awards Rs. 10 lakhs as damages in a trade mark infringement case","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction in favour of Google LLC for its mark \u201cGOOGLE\u201d and awarded Rs. 10 lakhs as damages to Google LLC which was to be paid jointly and severally by the defendants.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}