{"id":329947,"date":"2024-09-03T15:00:09","date_gmt":"2024-09-03T09:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=329947"},"modified":"2024-09-09T16:25:43","modified_gmt":"2024-09-09T10:55:43","slug":"presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a contempt petition the division bench of JK Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. directed that in this Court, online presence of only those advocates be furnished and be marked who are appearing or assisting during hearing as indicated above and not of those who are not present in Court but may be associated in office of the advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During hearing, on being asked as to who is appearing for the respondent, it is informed by an Advocate, that an Advocate on Record (&#8216;AoR&#8217;), is representing them. He made a request to accommodate him because he is out of town and not available.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon checking whether the AoR is connected to Court proceedings through video conferencing, it was revealed that the AoR is not connected online, however, his name was submitted through an online portal to mark his presence in the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court viewed that without AoR&#8217;s presence in Court in person or appearance through VC, submission of online appearance is completely unfair, especially when he is not in Court and not even in town. Further, the Court noted that there are more counsels representing the parties, who are neither present physically before this Court nor joined through video conferencing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After perusing the circular of the Supreme Court Registry dated 30-12-2022 by which a portal for online appearance was activated w.e.f. 02-01-2023, the Court noted that AoRs are permitted to mark appearances of the &#8220;advocates appearing in court&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court said that such instruction casts onerous responsibility on the AoR to furnish information of the advocate appearing online or physically in the case, which means that the advocate who is either present in the case or assisting them in the Court, the presence of only those is to be marked, and the advocate, who is neither present personally nor online, may not be allowed to mark his presence by furnishing online information.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that based on the counsel&#8217;s presence in the proceedings, the advocates may be entitled to certain benefits such as allotment of chamber, designation of senior advocates and others. In the long run, if the advocates who are not present in the Court are permitted to mark their presence, it may have adverse impact on those Bar members who are appearing regularly. Therefore, for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, online information ought to be submitted of only those advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court directed that in this Court, online presence of only those advocates be furnished and be marked who are appearing or assisting during hearing as indicated above and not of those who are not present in Court but may be associated in office of the advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court requested the members of the Supreme Court Bar Association and Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association to furnish online presence only of those advocates as indicated and ensure its compliance in true sense and spirit. The Bench further requested the Presidents of respective Bar Associations of the Supreme Court to look into the issue and notify the members for taking corrective steps.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter will next be taken up on 04-09-2024.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Baidya Nath Choudhary v. Dr. Sree Surendra Kumar Singh, Conmt.Pet.(C) No. 1188\/2018 in C.A. No. 2703\/2017, decided on 29-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AORMs. Manjula Gupta, AOR (Not present) Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. (Dr.) Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, AOR Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Ms. Ria Yadav, Adv. Ms. Alice Raj, Adv. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, AOR Mr. Aldanish Rein, AOR (Not present) Mr. Joby P. Varghese, AOR (Not present) Mr. Chandan Kumar, AOR (Not present) Mr. Sumit Kumar, AOR (Not present) Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR (Not present) Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR (Not present)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Rajesh Prasad Singh, AOR (Not present) Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, AOR (Not present) Ms. Rebecca Mishra, Adv. Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR (Not present) Mr. Narendra Hooda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Pranjal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kashif Irshad Khan, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR (Not present) Mr. Gopal Prasad, AOR (Not present) Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR Mr. Sudipto Singha Roy, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Udita Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AOR (Not present) Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR (Not present) Mr. Samant Singh, Adv. Ms. Pushpanjali Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR (Not present) Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR (Not present) Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR Mr. Sujeet Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR (Not present) Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. (Dr.) Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AOR Mr. Bijay Kumar Sinha, Adv. Ms. Ananya Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mani Saran, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7SUKL4iN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2399<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Baidya Nath Choudhary<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Dr. Sree Surendra Kumar Singh<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AORMs. Manjula Gupta, AOR (Not present) Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. (Dr.) Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, AOR Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Ms. Ria Yadav, Adv. Ms. Alice Raj, Adv. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, AOR Mr. Aldanish Rein, AOR (Not present) Mr. Joby P. Varghese, AOR (Not present) Mr. Chandan Kumar, AOR (Not present) Mr. Sumit Kumar, AOR (Not present) Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR (Not present) Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR (Not present)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Rajesh Prasad Singh, AOR (Not present) Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, AOR (Not present) Ms. Rebecca Mishra, Adv. Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR (Not present) Mr. Narendra Hooda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Pranjal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kashif Irshad Khan, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar &#8211; I, AOR (Not present) Mr. Gopal Prasad, AOR (Not present) Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR Mr. Sudipto Singha Roy, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Udita Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AOR (Not present) Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR (Not present) Mr. Samant Singh, Adv. Ms. Pushpanjali Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR (Not present) Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR (Not present) Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR Mr. Sujeet Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR (Not present) Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. (Dr.) Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AOR Mr. Bijay Kumar Sinha, Adv. Ms. Ananya Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mani Saran, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/27.-Maheshwari-modified.png\" alt=\"JK Maheshwari, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/>JK Maheshwari, J.<\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Rajesh-Bindal-Crop-1.jpg\" alt=\"Rajesh Bindal, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Rajesh Bindal, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Based on the counsel&#8217;s presence in the proceedings, the advocates may be entitled to certain benefits such as allotment of chamber, designation of senior advocates and others. In the long run, if the advocates who are not present in the Court are permitted to mark their presence, it may have adverse impact on those Bar members who are appearing regularly.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":329952,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[38700,30393,65687,44377,72720,72719,72721,46980,14691],"class_list":["post-329947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-advocate-on-record","tag-contempt-petition","tag-justice-jk-maheshwari","tag-justice-rajesh-bindal","tag-online-appearance","tag-physical-presence-of-advocates","tag-supreme-court-advocates-on-record-association","tag-supreme-court-bar-association","tag-video-conferencing"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked: Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court held that for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court held that for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-03T09:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-09T10:55:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/\",\"name\":\"Presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked: Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-03T09:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-09T10:55:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court held that for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked: Supreme Court | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court held that for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court","og_description":"Supreme Court held that for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-03T09:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-09T10:55:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/","name":"Presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked: Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-03T09:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-09T10:55:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Supreme Court held that for sanctity of the proceedings and for betterment of the Institution, presence of advocates who are either appearing or assisting during hearing, personally or online, will be marked","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Presence-of-advocates.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":343957,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/only-arguing-counsel-appearing-physically-and-assisting-counsel-will-be-recorded-in-appearance-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":329947,"position":0},"title":"Only arguing counsel appearing physically and assisting counsel will be recorded in appearance; Senior Advocate shall not appear without AOR: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA right of an Advocate to appear for a party and to practice in the Courts is coupled with the duty to remain present in the Court at the time of hearing, and to participate and conduct the proceedings diligently, sincerely, honestly and to the best of his ability. Rights\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court appearance","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Supreme-Court-appearance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Supreme-Court-appearance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Supreme-Court-appearance.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Supreme-Court-appearance.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":329947,"position":1},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Prior to being elevated to the Supreme Court in 2023, Justice Rajesh Bindal was serving as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Rajesh Bindal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":150114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/17\/advocate-mohit-chaudhary-barred-from-practicing-for-1-month-for-levelling-false-accusations-on-sc-registry-contempt-charges-dropped\/","url_meta":{"origin":329947,"position":2},"title":"Advocate Mohit Chaudhary barred from practicing for 1 month for levelling false accusations on SC Registry &#038; CJI; Contempt charges dropped","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Advocate Mohit Chaudhary, who accused the Registry of this Court in order to favour the opposite party to hastily list the matter with the objective of \u201cBench Hunt\u201d, had been barred from practicing as an Advocate-on-record for one month by a 3-judge bench of JS Khehar, CJ and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/26\/let-them-be-seen-a-case-for-recording-every-advocates-presence-in-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":329947,"position":3},"title":"Let Them Be Seen: A Case for Recording Every Advocate&#8217;s Presence in the Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vanshaj Azad*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Recording Every Advocate's Presence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Recording-Every-Advocates-Presence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Recording-Every-Advocates-Presence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Recording-Every-Advocates-Presence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Recording-Every-Advocates-Presence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316214,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/senior-advocate-designated-advocate-on-record-supreme-court-of-india-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":329947,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court designates 5 new Senior Advocates","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The decision to designate 5 Senior Advocates was taken in a Full Court meeting presided by Dr Justice DY Chandrachud, the Chief Justice of India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Senior Advocates Supreme Court of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Senior-Advocates-Supreme-Court-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Senior-Advocates-Supreme-Court-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Senior-Advocates-Supreme-Court-of-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Senior-Advocates-Supreme-Court-of-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346077,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/18\/contempt-of-court-sc-spilt-verdict-acceptance-apology-advocates-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":329947,"position":5},"title":"Contempt of Court | SC delivers split verdict on acceptance of unconditional apology by errant Advocates; Matter to be placed before CJI","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While Justice Bela M. Trivedi took a stern note of the actions of the errant advocates, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma accepted the unconditional apology.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"contempt of court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/shared-image-2025-04-18T174110.162.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/shared-image-2025-04-18T174110.162.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/shared-image-2025-04-18T174110.162.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/shared-image-2025-04-18T174110.162.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=329947"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329947\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/329952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=329947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=329947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=329947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}