{"id":329688,"date":"2024-08-30T18:15:24","date_gmt":"2024-08-30T12:45:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=329688"},"modified":"2024-09-04T11:35:23","modified_gmt":"2024-09-04T06:05:23","slug":"absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a tax writ against the order passed by the Additional Commissioner as well as the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Piyush Agrawal, J. held that that production of tax invoice, e-way bill, Guaranteed Remittance or payment details is not sufficient to show the actual physical movement of the transaction for the purposes of availing Input Tax Credit under Section 16 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/p>\n

The petitioner is a proprietorship firm which is engaged in the business of reselling and purchase of Peanut, Galla and Paddy. Thereafter, the Commissioners issued a show cause notice under Section 74 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for June, July, August and September, 2020-21 to the petitioner for availing wrong input tax credit. The petitioner submitted his reply, but not being satisfied from the same, the Additional Commissioner, passed the order dated 24-08-2021 and imposed the tax upon the petitioner, amounting to Rs.20,31,775\/- and penalty of equal amount as well, against which the petitioner preferred an appeal, which has also been rejected by the impugned order. Hence the current writ petition was filed.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/p>\n

The Court took note of Section 16 U.P. Goods and Services Act (‘UPGST Act’) and said that registered dealers can claim the benefit of input tax credit only on fulfilment of certain conditions as enumerated under the Act. Section 16 specifically provides the registered dealer to fulfil the conditions as provided therein for availment of input tax credit.<\/p>\n

Further, after taking note of Section 74 of UP GST Act, the Court said that determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts empowers to issue notice that tax has not been paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit has wrongly been availed or utilized by any reason or wilful misstatement or suppression of fact. Upon adjudication the assessee is required to show cause as to why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest payable thereon under Section 50 and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court concluded that in the event of wrong availment of input tax credit, the proceedings can be initiated against the registered person or registered dealer but at the same time, restrictions has been imposed upon the authorities that without putting notice to the dealer, no adjudication proceeding can be initiated.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that in the case in hand, the petitioner has only brought on record the tax invoices, e-way bills, and payment through banking channel, but no such details such as payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts and payment thereof has been provided. Thus, in the absence of these documents, the actual physical movement of goods and genuineness of transportation as well as transaction cannot be established and, in such circumstances, further no proof of filing of GSTR 2 A has been brought on record, the proceeding has rightly been initiated against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to various Judgments, and the decision in State of Karnataka<\/span> v. Ecom Gill Coffee Trading (P) Ltd.<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 248<\/a>, wherein it was held that “primarily burden of proof for claiming the input tax credit is upon the dealer to furnish the details of selling dealer, vehicle number, payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, tax invoices and payment particulars etc. to prove and establish the actual physical movement of the goods. Further submitting tax invoice, e-way bill, Guaranteed Remittance or payment details is not sufficient”.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n

[Anil Rice Mill v. State of UP, 2024 SCC OnLine All 4510<\/a>, decided on 14-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel for Petitioner:<\/span> Pranjal Shukla<\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondent:<\/span> Chief Standing Counsel<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In the event of wrong availment of input tax credit, the proceedings can be initiated against the registered person or registered dealer but at the same time, restrictions has been imposed upon the authorities that without putting notice to the dealer, no adjudication proceeding can be initiated.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[72619,2822,29442,72618,72621,72617,2621,54270,72620],"class_list":["post-329688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acknowledgement-of-taking-delivery-of-goods","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-e-way-bill","tag-payment-of-freight-charges","tag-physical-movement-of-goods","tag-s-74-of-upgst","tag-Tax","tag-tax-invoice","tag-toll-receipts"],"yoast_head":"\nAbsence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods: Allahabad HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC upheld proceedings under S.74 of UPGST, and said that absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC upheld proceedings under S.74 of UPGST, and said that absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-30T12:45:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-04T06:05:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods: Allahabad HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-30T12:45:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-04T06:05:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC upheld proceedings under S.74 of UPGST, and said that absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods;\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC upheld proceedings under S.74 of UPGST, and said that absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods;","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST","og_description":"Allahabad HC upheld proceedings under S.74 of UPGST, and said that absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-30T12:45:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-04T06:05:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/","name":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-30T12:45:24+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-04T06:05:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabad HC upheld proceedings under S.74 of UPGST, and said that absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods;","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287026,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/16\/kvat-act-claims-of-input-tax-credit-transaction-must-be-proven-beyond-reasonable-doubt-says-supreme-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":329688,"position":0},"title":"KVAT Act| Claims of Input Tax Credit Transaction must be proven beyond reasonable doubt: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court stated that if the purchasing dealer fails to establish and prove the said important aspect of physical movement of the goods alleged to have been purchased by it from the concerned dealers and on which the ITC have been claimed, the Assessing Officer is absolutely justified in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-752.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-752.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-752.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-752.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/allahabad-hc-penalty-goods-in-transit-gst-registration-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":329688,"position":1},"title":"Penalty can’t be imposed on goods in transit with valid tax invoice and e-way bill, even after suspension of GST registration: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the authorities to carry out the exercise in terms of Section 129 (1)(a) of the CGST Act within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320091,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/15\/allahabad-hc-quashes-order-of-appellate-authority-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":329688,"position":2},"title":"Confiscation of goods cannot be done on estimates when option of physical verification is available; Allahabad High Court quashes order of confiscating stock and imposing penalty","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe burden of proof for confiscation of goods is on the Department and the procedure cannot be done merely on estimates when a physical verification can be carried out.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","url_meta":{"origin":329688,"position":3},"title":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"April 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar CJ and B.P. Routray, J. allowed the petition and held that the Tribunal was incorrect in holding that the freight shown in the sale bill separately is part of the sale price. It is held that the Petitioner is entitled to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":282720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":329688,"position":4},"title":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner","author":"Editor","date":"January 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view that neither the notice served upon the petitioner mentioned any specific defect found by the authorities nor the order of tax and demand specify any reason why the documents accompanying the goods were found to be defective.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":234200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/19\/ker-hc-power-of-detention-under-s-129-gst-act-to-be-exercised-only-in-cases-where-transportation-of-goods-is-in-contravention-of-act-and-rules-and-not-simply-because-document-relevant-for-assessme\/","url_meta":{"origin":329688,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Power of detention under S. 129, GST Act to be exercised only on contravention of statute, not simply because tax payment details absent in relevant documents","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed the writ petition and quashed the series of detention notices issued against the petitioner. The petitioner challenged a series of notices of detention, whereby a consignment of goods transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=329688"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329688\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=329688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=329688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=329688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}