{"id":329658,"date":"2024-08-30T16:00:34","date_gmt":"2024-08-30T10:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=329658"},"modified":"2024-09-03T16:49:58","modified_gmt":"2024-09-03T11:19:58","slug":"appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> In the present case, the question arose before the Court was whether an anticipatory bail application was maintainable before the regular Bench of High Court against the order passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, whereby the petitioner&#8217;s anticipatory bail application for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524689\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524690\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002927389\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Explosive Substances Act, 1908<\/a> was rejected. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajesh Shankar, J.<\/span>, stated that looking to the gravity and seriousness of the offences under the Schedule of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Investigation Agency Act, 2008<\/a> (&#8216;the NIA Act&#8217;), the legislature had made specific provision under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552194\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NIA Act<\/a> for filing of appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court to expedite the hearing of such cases. Thus, the word &#8220;Special Court&#8221; as mentioned in section 21 of NIA Act had to be given purposive construction, so that the purpose of the provision as intended by the legislature might be achieved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court opined that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court i.e., this Court, rather an appeal would lie under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552194\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NIA Act<\/a>, before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the objection was raised regarding the maintainability of the present anticipatory bail application as the case was registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524689\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524690\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002927389\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Explosive Substances Act, 1908<\/a>, which were the Scheduled Offences under the NIA Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner submitted that the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552194\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NIA Act<\/a> provided for filing of appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court against any judgment, sentence or order passed by a Special Court. Since, in the present case, the impugned order had not been passed by the Special Court, rather by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge- III, Palamau, Daltonganj (&#8216;Additional Sessions Judge&#8217;), if the objection was accepted, the petitioner would be remediless.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bikramjit Singh v. State of Punjab<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDIwMjApIDEwIFNDQyA2MTYmJiYmJjQwJiYmJiZTZWFyY2hQYWdl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2020) 10 SCC 616<\/a>, wherein it was held that all the Scheduled Offences whether investigated by the National Investigation Agency (&#8216;NIA&#8217;) or by the investigating agencies of the State Government, were to be tried exclusively by Special Courts set up under the NIA Act. Further, in the absence of any designated court, the fallback was upon the Court of Session alone. Thus, the Court stated that the Court of Session dealing with the scheduled offences under the NIA Act, in absence of a Special Court constituted either by the Central Government or by the State Government, was treated as Special Court and it should have all the powers to follow the procedure provided under Chapter IV of the NIA Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the fundamental rule of interpretation of statute was that the Court was not supposed to go beyond the statute, unless it was absolutely necessary to do so. Purposive interpretation of any provision of a statute was given, if literal interpretation of the same might not serve the purpose or might lead to absurdity. The intention of the legislature was derived by considering the meaning of the words used in the statute, with a view to understand the purpose or object of the enactment, the mischief, and its corresponding remedy that the enactment was designed to actualise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that if the word &#8220;Special Court&#8221; under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552194\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NIA Act<\/a> was given literal meaning, then appeal against only those judgments and orders which were passed by the Special Courts should lie before the Division Bench of the High Court and challenge to the judgments and orders passed by Session Courts even in the matter of Scheduled Offences would lie before the regular Bench of the High Court. Thus, the intention of the legislature in promulgating the law that the appeal should lie before to the Division Bench of the High Court in the matter of scheduled offences, will get frustrated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that looking to the gravity and seriousness of the offences under the Schedule of the NIA Act, the legislature had made specific provision under section 21 of the NIA Act for filing of appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court to expedite the hearing of such cases. Thus, the word &#8220;Special Court&#8221; as mentioned in section 21 of NIA Act had to be given purposive construction, so that the purpose of the provision as intended by the legislature might be achieved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in the present case, the FIR was lodged under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552201\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552202\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NIA Act<\/a> came under the scheduled offence and the case was being investigated by the State Agency. Thereafter, the petitioner&#8217;s anticipatory bail application was heard by the Additional Sessions Judge in absence of any notified Special Court in the Division and the same was rejected vide impugned order dated 18-07-2024. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court opined that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court i.e., this Court, rather an appeal would lie under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552194\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NIA Act<\/a>, before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Gulshan Kumar Singh v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/C7L4512f\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Jhar 3035<\/a>, decided on 21-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Prakhar Harit, Advocate; Divya, Advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The intention of the legislature is derived by considering the meaning of the words used in the statute, with a view to understand the purpose or object of the enactment, the mischief, and its corresponding remedy that the enactment is designed to actualise.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":317614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[72615,72614,5791,72613,35356,55705,21614],"class_list":["post-329658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-division-bench-of-high-court","tag-explosive-substances-act-1908","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-justice-rajesh-shankar","tag-national-investigation-agency-act-2008","tag-scheduled-offences","tag-sessions-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Appeal against Sessions Court\u2019s order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of HC: JHC |SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court stated that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court, and an appeal would lie before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court stated that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court, and an appeal would lie before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-30T10:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-03T11:19:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/\",\"name\":\"Appeal against Sessions Court\u2019s order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of HC: JHC |SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-30T10:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-03T11:19:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court stated that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court, and an appeal would lie before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeal against Sessions Court\u2019s order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of HC: JHC |SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court stated that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court, and an appeal would lie before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court stated that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court, and an appeal would lie before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-30T10:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-03T11:19:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/","name":"Appeal against Sessions Court\u2019s order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of HC: JHC |SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-30T10:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-03T11:19:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court stated that the present anticipatory bail application was not maintainable before the regular court, and an appeal would lie before appropriate Division Bench of this Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":378964,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":329658,"position":0},"title":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Madhya Pradesh High Court examined whether anticipatory bail could stand when additional, more serious offences had already been taken cognizance of by the Magistrate.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"cancellation of anticipatory bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/ap-hc-ruling-on-anticipatory-bail-under-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":329658,"position":1},"title":"Anticipatory bail maintainable only before High Court in absence of prima facie case under SC\/ST Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The prosecution had raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition contending that the Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 puts an embargo on the High Court from hearing any anticipatory bail application.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"anticipatory bail under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/sc-directs-hc-dgp-arnesh-kumar-guidelines-lower-courts-police-prevent-unnecessary-arrests\/","url_meta":{"origin":329658,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court directs HCs and DGPs of all States to ensure Arnesh Kumar guidelines are issued to lower courts and police authorities to prevent unnecessary arrests","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court opined that the Jharkhand High Court fell into error in adopting such a casual approach and set aside the impugned order. Thus, granted bail to the husband.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arnesh kumar guidelines","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/arnesh-kumar-guidelines.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/arnesh-kumar-guidelines.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/arnesh-kumar-guidelines.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/arnesh-kumar-guidelines.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277792,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/allahabad-high-court-anticipatory-bail-is-a-statutory-right-not-a-constitutional-right-successive-anticipatory-bail-application-not-maintainable-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":329658,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad High Court| Anticipatory bail is a statutory right not a Constitutional right; Successive anticipatory bail application not maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad high Court: In a second anticipatory bail application for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019) and 3 or 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO Act\u2019), Suresh Kumar Gupta, J. said that Section 439 Code of Criminal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/03\/economic-offences-not-to-be-treated-lightly-courts-should-tread-very-carefully-before-granting-bail-for-offences-with-severe-impact-on-society-supreme-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":329658,"position":4},"title":"Economic offences under PMLA not to be treated lightly, Courts should tread meticulously before granting bail: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court stated that in the case of an economic offence which has a severe impact on the society, the Courts should be very slow in exercising the discretion under Section 438 of CrPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-608.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-608.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-608.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-608.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/02\/pat-hc-adjudication-by-lower-court-on-a-matter-which-is-under-consideration-in-the-supreme-court-amounts-to-judicial-overreach\/","url_meta":{"origin":329658,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | Adjudication by lower court, on a matter which is under consideration in the Supreme Court, amounts to judicial overreach  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Full Bench of Hemant Kumar Srivastava, Aditya Kumar Trivedi and Ashutosh Kumar, JJ. refrained from adjudicating on the validity of Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. In the present case, the question for consideration was whether the provisions of Section 438 Code\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=329658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=329658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=329658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=329658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}