{"id":329217,"date":"2024-08-23T12:00:16","date_gmt":"2024-08-23T06:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=329217"},"modified":"2024-08-27T12:45:03","modified_gmt":"2024-08-27T07:15:03","slug":"delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> An appeal was filed by Mankind Pharma Limited (plaintiff) challenging the Single Judge&#8217;s order dated 06-07-2018, which was refused to grant a temporary injunction to restrain the respondent from using the trade name &#8220;Mercykind Pharmaceuticals Private Limited&#8221;. A division bench of Yashwant Varma and Davinder Dudeja, JJ., set aside the impugned order, finding that the refusal to grant an injunction was erroneous due to the likelihood of consumer confusion between &#8220;Mankind&#8221; and &#8220;Mercykind,&#8221; and directed a fresh consideration of the injunction application, with all parties&#8217; rights and contentions preserved and expedited proceedings scheduled for 27-08-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Mankind Pharma Ltd., the appellant\/ plaintiff, is a well-established pharmaceutical company that holds registrations for the mark &#8220;MANKIND&#8221; across various classes. It was alleged that the respondent\/defendant was initially working with the appellant as a Marketing Manager till he left their employment and initiated the process for incorporation of a company under the corporate name &#8220;MERCYKIND PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED&#8221; which came to be incorporated on 17-01-2015. The respondent is stated to have applied for registration of the trademark &#8220;MERCYKIND PHARMACEUTICAL&#8221; and once it started using the trade name &#8220;MERCYKIND&#8221; on its packaging that led to the institution of the suit before the present Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court was informed during the pendency of the present appeal, the respondent made significant changes both in its logo and get up of products which are being marketed by it, thus, the Court noted that these and other issues which arise would clearly merit consideration afresh by the Single Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the Single Judge&#8217;s order from 06-07-2018 needed to be revisited being influenced by the fact that significant changes had been made by the defendant in its logo and product get-up during the appeal&#8217;s pendency. The Court also acknowledged that these changes, along with other relevant issues, required fresh consideration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, and the order was set aside. The Court directed that the application for a temporary injunction be reconsidered by the Single Judge with due expedition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mankind Pharma Limited v. Chandra Mani Tiwari, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7R9izIPp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 5491<\/a>, decided on 09-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankur Sangal, Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Kiratraj Sadana, Ms. Nidhi Pathak, Advocates for appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Ms. Sanjana Saddy, Advocate for respondent<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court was informed that during the pendency of the present appeal, the Mercykind Pharmaceuticals made significant changes both in its logo and get up of products which are being marketed by it, which would clearly merit consideration afresh by the Single Judge.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[72373,72377,72374,72379,72372,72378,72376,72371,72375,72380],"class_list":["post-329217","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-injunctionorder","tag-intellectualproperty","tag-iplaw","tag-mankindpharma","tag-mercykindcase","tag-pharmaceuticallaw","tag-trademarkdispute","tag-trademarkinfringement","tag-trademarkprotectio"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mankind v Mercykind: Delhi HC directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Mankind v Mercykind Trademark Dispute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Mankind v Mercykind Trademark Dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-23T06:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-27T07:15:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Mankind v Mercykind: Delhi HC directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-23T06:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-27T07:15:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Mankind v Mercykind Trademark Dispute\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mankind v Mercykind: Delhi HC directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Mankind v Mercykind Trademark Dispute","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute","og_description":"Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Mankind v Mercykind Trademark Dispute","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-23T06:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-27T07:15:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/","name":"Mankind v Mercykind: Delhi HC directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-23T06:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-27T07:15:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Mankind v Mercykind Trademark Dispute","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/23\/delhi-high-court-directs-fresh-consideration-injunction-mankind-mercykind-trademark-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Mankind v Mercykind] Delhi High Court directs fresh consideration of Injunction Application in Trademark Dispute"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/intellectual-property-rights-roundup-with-top-ip-cases-july-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":329217,"position":0},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights | A quick view of top Intellectual Property cases from July and August 2024","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick recap of top Intellectual Property cases on sale of counterfeit copies of EBC\u2019s books, Nizam\u2019s trade mark, Mankind v. Mercykind, Adidas, L\u2019Or\u00e9al, Electronica, and more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-protecting-mankind-pharmas-kind-trade-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":329217,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction protecting Mankind Pharma\u2019s \u2018KIND\u2019 trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe identity in the defendant\u2019s marks is so close to Mankind\u2019s trade marks that the two are indistinguishable. The infringing activities of the defendant is likely to cause confusion in the course of trade of Mankind leading to erosion of consumers\u2019 trust.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"protecting Mankind Pharma","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/23\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-mankind-pharma-restrain-infringement-trade-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":329217,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of Mankind Pharma Ltd. to restrain infringement of trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It was said that if no ex-parte ad-interim injunction is granted, Mankind Pharma would suffer an irreparable loss.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/delhi-hc-grants-injunction-against-mankind-pharma-for-infringing-hind-chemical-sumag-packaging-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":329217,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Mankind Pharma Limited for infringing Hind Chemical\u2019s \u2018SU-MAG\u2019 packaging","author":"Arunima","date":"December 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiff\u2019s main product line includes an ointment meant for relief of boils and abrasions famously known as 'SU-MAG' and also manufactures \u2018MAG-MAG\u2019, \u2018CREMOBAR\u2019, \u2018COFEX\u2019, \u2018GLYCERIN\u2019, \u2018SUPPOSITORY' as well as other ayurvedic products namely \u2018Livzon Syrup and Capsule\u2019 and \u2018Imminex Syrup and Capsule\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Injunction against Mankind Pharma Limited","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Injunction-against-Mankind-Pharma-Limited.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Injunction-against-Mankind-Pharma-Limited.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Injunction-against-Mankind-Pharma-Limited.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Injunction-against-Mankind-Pharma-Limited.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-upholds-injunction-novakind-bio-sciences-mankind-pharma-kind-trademark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":329217,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds injunction against Novakind Bio Sciences for infringing Mankind Pharma&#8217;s &#8216;KIND&#8217; trademark","author":"Arunima","date":"November 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Mankind Pharma used the mark \"MANKIND\" since 1986 and holds 78 separate trademark registrations covering a variety of pharmaceutical products. The concern arose when Novakind adopted the name \"NOVAKIND\" for its pharmaceutical products.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/25\/hc-weekly-roundup-august-2024-legal-news-scc-times-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":329217,"position":5},"title":"HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on R.G. Kar Medical College; IAS Puja Khedkar; Mankind; and more","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick review of various High Court cases reported this week","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/MANKIND.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/MANKIND.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/MANKIND.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/MANKIND.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=329217"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329217\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=329217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=329217"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=329217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}