{"id":328981,"date":"2024-08-20T11:00:36","date_gmt":"2024-08-20T05:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328981"},"modified":"2024-08-20T10:55:29","modified_gmt":"2024-08-20T05:25:29","slug":"cases-reported-in-hcc-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Cases Reported in HCC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">(2024) 1 HCC (Bom)<\/h4>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>&#8212;Or. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7 R. 11<\/a>&#8212;Rejection of plaint &#8212;<\/span> Appeal against Trial Court&#8217;s decision allowing application for rejection of plaint for want of cause of action. Held, contention of defendant that plaintiff not entitled to any relief cannot be looked into. Evidence or merits of controversy cannot be examined at stage of decision of application under Or. 7 R. 11, [<i>Diyashree Tuyenkar<\/i> v. <i>Vinod Vishwanath Tuyenkar<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002045189\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 1 HCC (Bom) 73<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">(2023) 1 HCC (Cal)<\/h4>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">GST&#8212;Offences and Penalties&#8212;Penalty&#8212;<\/span>Assessee purchased second hand car from Assam which was intercepted and penalty was imposed for supply of goods on basis of false documents. Determination of taxable value and penalty at 200 per cent on value including tax and cess was challenged. Held. prima facie case for interim order for release of goods was made out, [<i>Gurbux Singh Gupta<\/i> v. <i>State of W.B.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001777023\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 1 HCC (Cal) 647<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948210\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559003\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">46<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559014\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">56<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558940\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">111<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">107<\/a>&#8212;Jurisdiction of civil court to decide validity of registration of trade mark &#8212; Exclusion of&#8212;<\/span>Challenge to the registered trade mark &#8220;Ganesh&#8221;. Application for framing of issues with regard to the validity of the registered trade marks of the plaintiffs and to adjourn the suit for three months to enable the defendants to apply to the High Court for rectification of the register. Allowing the application, the High Court reiterated all questions with regard to the validity of a trade mark is required to be decided by the Registrar or the High Court under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948210\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958<\/a> or by the Registrar or the High Court under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> and not by the civil court. The Civil Court, in fact, is not empowered by the Act to decide the said question, [<i>Ganesh Grains Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Shree Ganesh Besan Mill<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002042915\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 1 HCC (Cal) 652<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">(2020) 2 HCC (Del)<\/h4>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>&#8212;Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523250\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">22 Rule 9(2)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523244\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4(4)<\/a>&#8212;<\/span>Challenge to allowance of an application for impleadment of the legal heirs under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC, subject to payment of costs of Rs 10,000 to be paid by the respondent- landlady. Held, finding that there was no vested right in favour of the tenants was upheld as the tenants cannot, on the ground that the petition had abated, claim a vested right to continue to enjoy rights in the tenanted premises, when admittedly they do not have any independent rights in the premises. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed with costs of Rs 50,000 to be paid to the respondent-landlady, [<i>J.S. Sharma &amp; Sons<\/i> v. <i>Shiv Devi Meena<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002045277\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2020) 2 HCC (Del) 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">(2023) 6 HCC (Del)<\/h4>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>&#8212;Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523643\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8 Rule 10<\/a>&#8212;<\/span>Application under Order 8 Rule 10 of the CPC seeking a judgment in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of the said rule. Order 8 Rule 10CPC, plainly read, applies only where a party, from whom a written statement is required either under Order 8 Rule 1 or Order 8 Rule 9 fails to present the written statement within the time permitted or the time fixed by the court. In either of these exigencies, the plaintiff is permitted, by Order 8 Rule 10, to require the court to pronounce judgment against the defendants or make such other order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit. The first requirement of Order 8 Rule 10CPC, therefore, remained unsatisfied, hence, application dismissed in limine, [<i>DLT Global Inc.<\/i> v. <i>DLT Labs Technologies (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002045279\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 6 HCC (Del) 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>&#8212;Reassessment-Notice-Effect of S. 292-BB&#8212;<\/span>Held, S. 292-BB not applicable when notice served improperly, [<i>CIT<\/i> v. <i>Dart Infrabuild (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001886767\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 6 HCC (Del) 15<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>&#8211; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34(3)<\/a> proviso-Application for setting aside Award-Limitation Period&#8212;<\/span>Held, proviso permits condonation of delay for a maximum period of 30 days and not thereafter. However, the delay shall not be condoned routinely, and the court is not required to peruse the merits of the case if the petitioner was unable to satisfy the court, [<i>Omaxe Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Joginder Singh Nijjar<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002049066\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 6 HCC (Del) 28<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a>&#8212;Interference with arbitral awards when not warranted-Reappreciation of evidence&#8212;<\/span> Held, court while examining findings in arbitral award cannot reassess or reappreciate evidence, [<i>NHAI<\/i> v. <i>PCL Suncon JV<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002049067\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 6 HCC (Del) 53<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p><\/body><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">(2024) 1 HCC (Del)<\/h4>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a>&#8212;Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534491\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534467\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">45<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534438\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534439\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(na)<\/a> &#8212; Default bail on grounds of incomplete investigation&#8212;<\/span> Held, issue of summons to another person, or seeking leave of court to file additional evidence does not infer incomplete investigation, [<i>Ram Kishor Arora<\/i> v. <i>Enforcement Directorate<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002049068\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 1 HCC (Del) 155<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">(2023) 1 HCC (Mad)<\/h4>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825997\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001564434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13<\/a> &#8212; Disproportionate assets&#8212;Appeal by State challenging erroneous exclusion of assets based on income tax returns filed after search and seizure&#8212;<\/span> Held, such exclusion not only based on income tax returns filed under voluntary disclosure scheme alone. The accused was able to prove the assets did not belong to him or his family, [<i>State of T.N.<\/i> v. <i>G. Chandrasekar<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002044589\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 1 HCC (Mad) 321<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">GST&#8212;Input Tax Credit&#8212;Cancellation of registration of supplier prior to raising invoices&#8212;Observed, supplier could not have paid tax to the exchequer&#8212;<\/span> Held, the assessee was not entitled to credit of input tax, [<i>Jai Balaji Paper Cones<\/i> v. <i>CST<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001887003\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 1 HCC (Mad) 345<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":321576,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,68098],"tags":[10131,26884,8331,6241,68396,13081,26374,25244,46380],"class_list":["post-328981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-high-court-cases","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-cases-reported","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-gst","tag-hcc","tag-income-tax-act","tag-input-tax-credit","tag-prevention-of-money-laundering-act","tag-trial-courts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cases Reported in HCC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cases Reported in HCC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-20T05:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Cases Reported in HCC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Cases Reported in HCC\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-20T05:30:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":824,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"arbitration and conciliation act\",\"Cases reported\",\"civil procedure code\",\"GST\",\"HCC\",\"Income Tax Act\",\"Input Tax Credit\",\"Prevention of Money Laundering Act\",\"Trial Courts\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Cases Reported\",\"High Court Cases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cases Reported in HCC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-20T05:30:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Cases Reported in HCC\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/20\\\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cases Reported in HCC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cases Reported in HCC | SCC Times","description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cases Reported in HCC","og_description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-20T05:30:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Cases Reported in HCC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Cases Reported in HCC","datePublished":"2024-08-20T05:30:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/"},"wordCount":824,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp","keywords":["arbitration and conciliation act","Cases reported","civil procedure code","GST","HCC","Income Tax Act","Input Tax Credit","Prevention of Money Laundering Act","Trial Courts"],"articleSection":["Cases Reported","High Court Cases"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/","name":"Cases Reported in HCC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-20T05:30:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u2014Or. 7 R. 11\u2014Rejection of plaint \u2014 Appeal against Trial Court\u2019s decision allowing application for rejection","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Cases Reported in HCC"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/20\/cases-reported-in-hcc-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cases Reported in HCC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":328483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/cases-reported-in-hcc-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":328981,"position":0},"title":"Cases Reported in HCC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"(2023) 2 HCC (Bom) GST\u2014Offences and Penalties\u2014Arrest and Detention\u2014Input tax credit\u2014Issue of fake invoices in favour of non-existing entities and passing on of input tax credit to other companies\u2014Application for pre-arrest bail\u2014 Facts and circumstances prima facie, indicated that the assessee was involved in the said crime and affidavit filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Cases Reported in HCC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Cases-Reported-in-HCC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/ieee-mumbai-section-welfare-assn-v-global-ieee-institute-for-engineers-an-immediate-re-look-necessary-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":328981,"position":1},"title":"IEEE Mumbai Section Welfare Assn. v. Global IEEE Institute for Engineers: An Immediate Re-Look Necessary by the Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Basanti Lal Pavecha* and Avish Mittal**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/06\/cases-reported-in-hcc-case-laws-unfair-labour-practice-setting-aside-foreign-award-validity-of-will-gst-cancellation-and-more\/","url_meta":{"origin":328981,"position":2},"title":"CASES REPORTED IN HCC | Case Laws on Unfair Labour Practice; Setting Aside Foreign Award; Validity of Will; GST Cancellation; and more","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"An update on new additions of case laws to SCC\u2019s High Court Cases volume.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CASES REPORTED IN HCC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/HCC-8.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/HCC-8.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/HCC-8.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/HCC-8.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/09\/raj-hc-high-court-allows-application-for-amendment-of-the-plaint-after-rejection-by-the-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":328981,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | High Court allows application for amendment of the plaint after rejection by the trial court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J. allowed a petition for correction and amendment of the plaint due to inadvertent errors. In the present case, the application of the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 had been rejected by the trial court, barring it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/09\/ker-hc-suit-instituted-on-behalf-of-alleged-mentally-infirm-person-court-obliged-to-enquire-and-follow-procedure-under-order-xxxii-rules-12-and-15-of-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":328981,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Suit instituted on behalf of alleged mentally infirm person \u2013 Court obliged to enquire and follow procedure under Order XXXII Rules 12 and 15 of CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of A. Hariprasad, J. hearing an appeal against remand order, answered substantial questions of law in relation to suits instituted by a next friend. Respondent, purportedly on behalf of his alleged mentally infirm sister Rohini, filed a suit for declaration that a registered document executed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/14\/set-aside-order-of-trial-court-while-rejecting-husbands-plaint-for-declaration-of-divorce-decree-upon-pronouncement-triple-talaq-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":328981,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court&#39;s Triple Talaq judgment applies retrospectively; Andhra Pradesh High Court rejects husband&#39;s suit for decree of divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBy the time the judgment is proposed to be rendered on such a plaint, the law available for the Court would be that there was no Triple Talaq. Therefore, the view of the trial Court that the ratio in Shayara Banu's case (supra) is not applicable retrospectively is incorrect.\u201d observed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-491.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328981\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/321576"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}