{"id":32883,"date":"2016-01-16T15:28:33","date_gmt":"2016-01-16T09:58:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=32883"},"modified":"2016-02-09T14:48:14","modified_gmt":"2016-02-09T09:18:14","slug":"ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/","title":{"rendered":"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:<\/strong> While hearing the appeal filed by United India Insurance Co. against the order directing it to indemnify the respondent for burglary at his jewellery shop, J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ. reversed the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission holding that the respondent was not entitled to claim loss of the stolen items in view of clauses 4, 5 and 12 of the Insurance Policy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Relying on the Judgment, <em>General Assurance Society Ltd<\/em>. vs. <em>Chandumull Jain<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/1966_3_SCR_500\">AIR 1966 SC 1644<\/a>, the Court held that since the burglary had been committed of the articles kept in display window during night time (after business hours) and the appellant having made it clear to the respondent in clauses 4 and 5 that they would not be liable to indemnify the loss of any such articles kept in display window after business hours, the respondent was not entitled to claim any compensation for the loss of any such stolen articles.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, considering it not necessary to examine the merits of the claim filed by the Complainant, which has been rendered infructuous, the appeal was dismissed with no costs. [<em>United India Insurance Co. Ltd v.\u00a0 Orient Treasures Pvt. Ltd.<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_SC_32\">2016 SCC OnLine SC 32<\/a>, Decided on January 13, 2016]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: While hearing the appeal filed by United India Insurance Co. against the order directing it to indemnify the respondent for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: While hearing the appeal filed by United India Insurance Co. against the order directing it to indemnify the respondent for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-01-16T09:58:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-09T09:18:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/\",\"name\":\"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-16T09:58:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-09T09:18:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed","og_description":"Supreme Court: While hearing the appeal filed by United India Insurance Co. against the order directing it to indemnify the respondent for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-01-16T09:58:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-09T09:18:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/","name":"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-01-16T09:58:33+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-09T09:18:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/ncdrcs-order-against-united-india-insurance-co-reversed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCDRC\u2019s order against United India Insurance Co., reversed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/double-insurance-overlapping-policies-right-insurance-forfeit-levis-supreme-court-judgments-india-law-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":32883,"position":0},"title":"Double Insurance\u2013Overlapping policies: Grant of actual loss from one insurer will forfeit right to claim from other insurer; SC rejects Levi\u2019s\u2019 insurance claim","author":"Editor","date":"May 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case relating to double insurance, the 3-Judge Bench comprising of Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat* and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ., reversed the impugned order of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which allowed the insurance claim of Levi Strauss (India) Pvt. Ltd. which was repudiated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Double-Insurance%E2%80%93Overlapping-policies-Grant-of-actual-loss-from-one-insurer-will-forfeit-right-to-claim-from-other-insurer-Supreme-Court-rejects-Levis-insurance-claim.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/17\/scotus-burglary-in-mobile-structures-for-overnight-accommodation-included-in-burglary-under-armed-career-criminal-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":32883,"position":1},"title":"SCOTUS | Burglary in mobile structures for overnight accommodation included in \u2018burglary\u2019 under Armed Career Criminal Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United States: \u00a0This appeal was filed before the Bench of Breyer, J. The case involved two defendants who were convicted in the Federal Court for unlawful possession of firearms which was violative of \u00a7 922(g)(1) of The Armed Career Criminal Act. Each offender had State burglary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":39901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/18\/2016-scc-vol-3-march-14-2016-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":32883,"position":2},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 3 March 14, 2016 Part 1","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 18, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 24 \u2014 Transfer of matrimonial proceedings: There was no reason why divorce case be not transferred to Jamnagar when other proceedings between parties already pending at Jamnagar, hence, transfer of proceedings from Rajkot to Jamnagar, allowed. [Tejalben v. Mihirbhai Bharatbhai Kothari, (2016) 3 SCC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/22\/ker-hc-liability-of-insurer-to-indemnify-third-parties-subsists-unless-insurance-coverage-is-cancelled-and-an-intimation-thereof-has-reached-the-insured\/","url_meta":{"origin":32883,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Liability of insurer to indemnify third parties subsists unless insurance coverage is cancelled and an intimation thereof has reached the insured","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: P.B. Suresh Kumar, J. allowed an appeal filed by the claimant against the insurer in which an award was passed exonerating the liability of the insurer to indemnify the owner. \u00a0In the instant case, the claimant sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident and claimed for indemnity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323472,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/03\/supreme-court-sets-aside-ncdrc-order-directing-united-india-insurance-claim-bridge-collapsed-2009-death-48-workmen\/","url_meta":{"origin":32883,"position":4},"title":"SC sets aside NCDRC order directing United India Insurance Co. to pay insurance claim for bridge collapsed in 2009, resulting in death of 48 workmen","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court reiterated that exclusion clauses in insurance contracts are interpreted strictly against the insurer as they have the effect of completely exempting the insurer of its liabilities.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Insurance claim for bridge collapsed in 2009","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Insurance-claim-for-bridge-collapsed-in-2009.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Insurance-claim-for-bridge-collapsed-in-2009.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Insurance-claim-for-bridge-collapsed-in-2009.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Insurance-claim-for-bridge-collapsed-in-2009.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/02\/del-hc-insurance-policy-with-arbitration-clause-issued-post-irdais-circular-are-valid\/","url_meta":{"origin":32883,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court rules on Binding Nature of Arbitration Clause in Insurance Policies Issued After 2023 IRDAI Circular","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"December 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The respondent submitted that no arbitration clause existed in light of the IRDAI Circular dated 27-10-2023 and Gazette Notification dated 23-1-2024, which had de-notified and superseded arbitration clauses in fire insurance policies.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"insurance policy with arbitration clause","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/blog-8-24.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/blog-8-24.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/blog-8-24.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/blog-8-24.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32883\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}