{"id":328685,"date":"2024-08-14T15:30:17","date_gmt":"2024-08-14T10:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328685"},"modified":"2024-08-22T18:03:11","modified_gmt":"2024-08-22T12:33:11","slug":"no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/","title":{"rendered":"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Telangana High Court:<\/span> The issue raised in the present petitions was <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;whether show cause notices issued under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (&#8216;the 1961 Act&#8217;) in matters relating to international tax charges were exempted to follow the statutory faceless procedure?&#8221;<\/span>. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sujoy Paul*<\/span> and Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, JJ., opined that no exemption from faceless procedure could be read by combined reading of the provisions for the purpose of issuance of notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a> and in the present case, since notices under Section 148 were not issued in a faceless manner, the entire further proceeding and assessment orders stood vitiated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioners contended that the notices under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a> were issued in violation of the prescribed procedure of faceless assessment and were not issued by an officer holding charge of international tax cases. In the present case, the show cause notices were issued by a faced authority and thus, petitioners submitted that the notices run contrary to the mandatory procedure prescribed in the gazette notification dated 29-03-2022, which was related to the issuance of notice under Section 148 in a faceless manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001116894\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">151-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a> and opined that it was an enabling provision which permitted the Central Government to make a scheme for the following purposes, (a) assessment, reassessment or computation under Section 147; (b) issuance of notice under Section 148; (c) conducting enquiries or issuance of notice under Section 148-A; and (d) sanction for issue of such notice under Section 151. Thus, the Central Government, in exercise of power under Section 151-A, issued notification dated 23-09-2022.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559385\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">144-B(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a> made it obligatory for undertaking faceless assessment in respect of such territorial area, or persons or class of persons, or incomes or class of incomes, or cases or class of cases, as might be specified by the Board.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that Section 144-B(2) was also an enabling provision to the extent it gave authority to the Board to &#8216;specify&#8217; about applicability of faceless assessment in respect of class, income, group, etc. The Court noted that Clause 3(b) of notification\/scheme dated 29-03-2022 showed that issuance of notice under Section 148 was squarely covered and mandated under Clause 3 by making it clear that it shall be through automated allocation, in accordance with risk management strategy formulated by the Board as referred to in Section 148 for issuance of notice, and same had to be in a faceless manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"\">The Court stated that the expression &#8220;to the extent provided in Section 144-B of the Act&#8221; did not deal with &#8216;issuance of notice&#8217; under Section 148 and was applicable with reference to &#8216;assessment&#8217; and &#8216;reassessment&#8217;. Section 144-B(2) relates to &#8220;assessment&#8221; and did not deal with issuance of notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the order of CBDT dated 06-09-2021 dealt with &#8220;assessment orders&#8221; and the said order was passed in exercise of power under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559385\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">144-B<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a>. The order of CBDT was clear that direction was issued about passing of &#8220;assessment orders&#8221; by the National Faceless Assessment Centre under Section 144-B except in two situations, one of which was passing of assessment orders in cases assigned to International Tax Charges. Thus, the Court opined that there was no doubt that Section 144-B and order of CBDT dated 06-09-2021 gave exemption from following the mandatory faceless procedure only in relation to passing of assessment orders in cases of central charges and international tax charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the taxpayer was nowhere distinguished between NRIs and Indian Citizens and thus the notice issued under Section 148 must comply with the requirement of the scheme whether or not the taxpayer was NRI\/Indian Citizen.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hexaware Technologies Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asst. CIT<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 464 ITR 430 : 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1249<\/a>, and opined that the expression &#8220;to the extent provided in Section 144-B of the Act&#8221; used in Clause 3(b) of the scheme dated 29-03-2022 did not preclude the mandatory faceless procedure for issuance of notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a>. The Court also opined that any other interpretation would not only cause violence to the language used but would also defeat the object for which a transparent &#8216;faceless procedure&#8217; was introduced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that no exemption from faceless procedure could be read by combined reading of the provisions for the purpose of issuance of notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 1961 Act<\/a>. The Court stated that respondents had erred in not following the mandatory faceless procedure as prescribed and since notices under Section 148 were not issued in a faceless manner, the entire further proceeding and assessment orders stood vitiated. Thus, the impugned notices under Section 148 and all consequential assessment orders were set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Venkataramana Reddy Patloola v. CIT, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cLbN1m6M\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine TS 1792<\/a>, decided on 24-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Sujoy Paul<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Dundu Manmohan, A.V. Raghu Ram, A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, Counsels<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Vijhay K. Punna, Senior Standing Counsel<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The taxpayer is nowhere distinguished between NRIs and Indian Citizens. The notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must comply with the requirement of the Scheme whether or not the taxpayer is NRI\/Indian Citizen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":315575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2649,72082,51086,72084,71501,71500,3659,72083,19861,33941],"class_list":["post-328685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-exemption","tag-faceless-procedure","tag-income-tax-act-1961","tag-international-tax-charges","tag-justice-namavarapu-rajeshwar-rao","tag-justice-sujoy-paul","tag-notice","tag-section-144-b","tag-section-148","tag-telangana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued u\/S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana High Court held that there was no exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telangana High Court held that there was no exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-14T10:00:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-22T12:33:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/\",\"name\":\"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued u\/S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-14T10:00:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-22T12:33:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Telangana High Court held that there was no exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Telangana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued u\/S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC | SCC Times","description":"Telangana High Court held that there was no exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC","og_description":"Telangana High Court held that there was no exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-14T10:00:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-22T12:33:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/","name":"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued u\/S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-14T10:00:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-22T12:33:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Telangana High Court held that there was no exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Telangana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/no-exemption-from-faceless-procedure-for-notices-issued-u-s-148-it-act-1961-for-international-tax-charges-telhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No exemption from faceless procedure for notices issued under S. 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for international tax charges: Telangana HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/05\/section-144b-7-of-the-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":328685,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Issuance of prior show cause notice and draft assessment order under S. 144B (7) of Income Tax Act: Is it a mandatory condition before issuing final assessment order? HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Manmohan and Navin Chawla, JJ., noted the mandatory condition provided under Section 144B (7) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Present petition challenged the Assessment order, notice of demand and notice of penalty passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B, Section 156 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266464,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/05\/reassessment-notices-90000-section-148a-income-tax-act-revenue-supreme-court-judgments-legal-news-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":328685,"position":1},"title":"Over 90, 000 Reassessment Notices issued after April 1, 2021 saved as Supreme Court directs them to be treated as notices under Section 148A of Income Tax Act\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has modified the order passed by the Allahabad High Court wherein it had quashed several reassessment notices issued by the Revenue, issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the same are bad\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/del-hc-sets-aside-assessment-notice-sent-under-s-148-income-tax-act-1961-to-a-dead-person-for-being-null-and-void\/","url_meta":{"origin":328685,"position":2},"title":"Del HC sets aside assessment notice sent under S. 148 Income Tax Act, 1961 to a dead person for being null and void","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Jyoti Singh and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ. sets aside notices sent to a deceased assessee in spite of being intimated about his death by the family.\u00a0 The instant petition was filed by the petitioner who is the son of Late Mr. Amrit Thapar,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/30\/meghalaya-high-court-minimum-7-days-time-to-be-provided-to-respond-to-the-reassessment-notice-under-s-148-of-it-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":328685,"position":3},"title":"Meghalaya High Court| Minimum 7 days time to be provided to respond to the reassessment notice under S. 148 of IT Act, 1961","author":"Editor","date":"June 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee, CJ. and W. Diengdoh, J. disposed of a petition holding that the assessee should be given a minimum of 7 days' time to respond to the reassessment notice. A notice under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 had been issued\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/26\/delhi-high-court-upholds-transfer-of-income-tax-assessment-of-sanjay-gandhi-memorial-trust-aam-aadmi-party-central-circle-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":328685,"position":4},"title":"No prejudice shall be caused on account of transfer of cases to Central Circle; Delhi High Court upholds transfer of Income Tax assessment of Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Trust, Aam Aadmi Party","author":"Arunima","date":"June 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 127 of IT Act to the extent it permits transfer from one Assessing Officer under a Principal Commissioner of Income Tax to another Assessing Officer under another Principal Commissioner of Income Tax who are holding non-concurrent charges remains untouched and continues to apply in its pristine form.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/del-hc-dismisses-petition-quash-reassessment-notices-issued-jurisdictional-assessing-officer-interaction-assessments\/","url_meta":{"origin":328685,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Faceless framework was established to reduce direct human interaction in assessments\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses petition to quash reassessment notices for being issued by JAO","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The Legislature recognized that while strict procedural compliance is fundamental to maintain fairness in assessment process, an inflexible adherence to procedure could inadvertently lead to administrative bottlenecks and a surge in litigation.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328685"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328685\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}