{"id":328593,"date":"2024-08-13T15:00:43","date_gmt":"2024-08-13T09:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328593"},"modified":"2024-08-16T11:25:54","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T05:55:54","slug":"legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed for quashing the FIR dated 06-05-2022, registered for the commission of an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000203904\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000204010\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rakesh Kainthla, J.<\/span>, stated that the Mohammedan law did not provide a single mode of Talaq, but multiple modes and out of these modes, the legislature had only prohibited Talaq-e-Biddat or any other similar form of Talaq having the effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce pronounced by a Muslim husband. The Court stated that prima facie, the letter written by the petitioner, which was the subject matter of the FIR, did not fall within the definition of Talaq-e-Biddat, and was not punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000203903\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000204010\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it could not say anything about the truthfulness of the statement, and it was a matter of trial to be determined by the Trial Court. Further, the status report showed that a charge sheet had been filed before the Court, therefore, the Competent Court was seized of the matter. Thus, the Court stated that it was not possible to quash the FIR in the exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction, and accordingly dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the informant filed an FIR before the police station, stating that his daughter-victim was married to the petitioner on 12-12-2020. The petitioner was informed that the victim had to undergo training as an Ayurvedic Doctor, and he expressed his consent for the same. Further, the petitioner&#8217;s demand for dowry was also fulfilled. However, the petitioner and his father started harassing the victim for bringing more dowry. The victim tried to adjust in her matrimonial home, but she was harassed, both mentally and physically. Further, when the victim got admission to the MD Course at Navi Mumbai, the petitioner and his family members became aggressive and threatened her. The petitioner threatened to divorce her and sent a written divorce on 25-04-2022 by levelling false and baseless allegations. It was contended that the divorce sent by the petitioner was a violation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000203903\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000204010\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>, hence, it was prayed that an action to be taken against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The police registered the FIR and conducted the investigation. In the victim&#8217;s statement recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">164<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;), it was disclosed that the petitioner had divorced her by pronouncing triple talaq on 13-01-2022. Hence, the police filed a charge sheet before the Court. Thus, being aggrieved from the registration of the FIR, the petitioner had filed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the FIR mentioned that on 25-04-2022, a written talaq was sent by the petitioner by levelling false and baseless allegations against the victim. The Court noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000203903\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000204010\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a> provided that any pronouncement of Talaq by a Muslim husband upon his wife, by words, either spoken or written or in electronic form or any other manner whatsoever, should be void and illegal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court referred to Mulla Principles of Mahomedan Law 22nd Edition 2019 and observed that the Talaq becomes irrevocable in Talaq Ahasan mode on the expiration of the period of Iddat, in Talaq-e-Hasan mode on the third pronouncement irrespective of Iddat and in Talaq-ul-Biddat mode immediately after it was pronounced irrespective of the Iddat. The Court stated that the Mohammedan law does not provide a single mode of Talaq, but multiple modes and out of these modes, the legislature had only prohibited Talaq-e-Biddat or any other similar form of Talaq having the effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce pronounced by a Muslim husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that in the present case, the FIR refers to the notice dated 25-04-2022, which provided that the petitioner conveyed the first communication of Talaq as required by law by pronouncing the word &#8216;Talaq&#8217;. It nowhere mentioned that the Talaq had become irrevocable, or it had the effect of instantaneous divorce. The Court stated that prima facie, the letter written by the petitioner, which was the subject matter of the FIR, did not fell within the definition of Talaq-e-Biddat, and was not punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000203903\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000204010\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the victim&#8217;s statement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">164<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> was challenged as incorrect. Thus, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Priyanka Jaiswal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Jharkhand<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAyMDE5MTYyJiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiYyMDI0IFNDQyBPbkxpbmUgU0MgNjg1JiYmJiZQaHJhc2UmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 685<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Maneesha Yadav<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAyMDE1ODk5JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiYyMDI0IFNDQyBPbkxpbmUgU0MgNjQzJiYmJiZQaHJhc2UmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 643<\/a>, and opined that the truthfulness or otherwise of the investigation was not to be seen at this stage. The Court stated that it could not say anything about the truthfulness of the statement, and it was a matter of trial to be determined by the Trial Court. Further, the status report showed that a charge sheet had been filed before the Court, therefore, the Competent Court was seized of the matter. Thus, the Court stated that it was not possible to quash the FIR in the exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction, and accordingly dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Shehwaz Khan v. State of H.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4irsO34Z\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine HP 3766<\/a>, decided on 08-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> M.A. Khan, Sr. Advocate, with Hem Kanta Kaushal and Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General; Imran Khan and Ketan Singh, Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In the present case, the FIR refers to the notice dated 25-04-2022, which reads that the petitioner conveyed the first communication of Talaq by pronouncing the word &#8216;Talaq&#8217;. It nowhere mentions that the Talaq had become irrevocable, or it had the effect of instantaneous divorce.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":318873,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2929,72021,72022,64495,44503,72023,72024,72025,43799,6501],"class_list":["post-328593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Himachal_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-instantaneous-divorce","tag-irrevocable-divorce","tag-justice-rakesh-kainthla","tag-mohammedan-law","tag-multiple-modes-of-talaq","tag-muslim-husband","tag-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019","tag-talaq-e-biddat","tag-triple-talaq"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court stated that the legislature only prohibited Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-13T09:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-16T05:55:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-13T09:30:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-16T05:55:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Himachal Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times","description":"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court stated that the legislature only prohibited Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-13T09:30:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-16T05:55:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/","name":"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-13T09:30:43+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-16T05:55:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: HP HC| SCC Times","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Himachal Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237537,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/16\/del-hc-merely-because-triple-talaq-has-been-declared-to-be-void-and-illegal-it-does-not-mean-that-legislature-could-not-have-made-continuation-of-triple-talaq-an-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":328593,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Merely because triple talaq has been declared to be void and illegal, it does not mean that legislature could not have made continuation of such practice an offence\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Rajnish Bhatnagar, JJ., in regard to Triple Talaq observed that, Prima facie it appears that the object of Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 is to discourage the age-old and traditional practice of pronouncement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":210386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/20\/cabinet-approves-proposal-for-promulgation-of-the-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-second-ordinance-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":328593,"position":1},"title":"Cabinet approves Proposal for Promulgation of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage), Second Ordinance, 2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet, chaired by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has given its approval to the following proposals: Promulgation of an Ordinance, namely the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Second Ordinance, 2019, as per Appendix-III (pages(9 to 12) under clause (1) of Article 123 of the Constitution; and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272377,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/26\/the-practices-of-triple-talaq-nikah-halala-and-the-resulting-confusion-in-international-family-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":328593,"position":2},"title":"The Practices of Triple Talaq, Nikah Halala and the Resulting Confusion in International Family Law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Stutee Nag\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Triple Talaq","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/25\/muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-second-ordinance-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":328593,"position":3},"title":"Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Second Ordinance, 2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Second Ordinance, 2019 has been promulgated to give continued effect to the provisions brought in by the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2019. This Ordinance,\u00a0inter alia, declares the practice of triple talaq to be void and illegal and also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":179454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/30\/lok-sabha-passes-bill-making-triple-talaq-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":328593,"position":4},"title":"Lok Sabha passes Bill making Triple Talaq unconstitutional [Read Bill]","author":"Saba","date":"December 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Lok Sabha in a historic move passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017 making triple talaq unconstitutional.\u00a0The Bill that seeks to protect married Muslim women from the practice of divorcing by uttering the word \u2018talaq\u2019 thrice makes talaq-e-biddat a\u201ccognizable and non-bailable offence\u201d.\u00a0The draft Bill includes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/25\/only-talaq-e-biddat-is-prohibited-and-not-talaq-e-ahsan-bomhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":328593,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Only Talaq-e-Biddat (Triple Talaq) is prohibited and not Talaq-e-Ahsan&#8217;; Bombay HC quashes FIR against husband and his parents","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Respondent 2 stated that the notice which her husband, Applicant 1 had given on 28-12-2023, stated that Talaq-e-Ahsan i.e., one pronouncement of Talaq, was given to her.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328593\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/318873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}