{"id":328487,"date":"2024-08-12T11:30:54","date_gmt":"2024-08-12T06:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328487"},"modified":"2024-08-16T11:30:56","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T06:00:56","slug":"accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jammu and Kashmir High Court:<\/span> In an appeal against the trial court&#8217;s order of conviction and sentence on the grounds that the trial court failed to comply with Section 342 of the Criminal procedure Code, 1989 [CrPC (J&amp;K)] by not properly recording the statements of the accused and not informing them of their right to defense, a single-judge bench of Vinod Chatterji Koul, J., set aside the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and remanded back the matter to the trial court for further proceedings, with the directions to ensure compliance with the necessary legal procedures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, on 31-05-2014, at around 2:00 PM, the victim, a resident of Ratnipora, was attacked with acid by the accused, resulting in severe burns to his face. The victim was immediately shifted to SMHS Hospital, Srinagar, for treatment. The police registered an FIR under Ranbir Penal Code (RPC). During the investigation, medical evidence supported the charges. The accused were arrested, and the case was committed to the Principal Sessions Judge, Pulwama. The trial commenced with the prosecution presenting 15 out of 43 listed witnesses. The defense did not lead any evidence, and the trial court convicted the accused based on the prosecution&#8217;s evidence. The appellants were subsequently sentenced. Aggrieved by the impugned order of conviction and sentence, the appellants preferred the present appeal challenging the same before this Court. The important question of law that arises for determination in the present is as to whether it is incumbent on the part of accused to spell out his defence including the plea of innocence at the stage of investigation, framing of charge while prosecution evidence is being recorded and at the stage of recording of statement under Section 342 of the Criminal procedure Code, 1989 [CrPC (J&amp;K)].<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants argued that the trial court failed to properly examine the accused under Section 342 of the CrPC (J&amp;K), which is analogous to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519590\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">313<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), thereby, depriving them of a fair opportunity to explain the circumstances against them. This omission was claimed to be a serious irregularity that could potentially vitiate the trial. It was contended that the court did not inform the accused of their right to lead defense evidence, leading to a prejudiced trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants asserted that the trial court did not correctly appreciate the evidence, as there were inconsistencies and contradictions in the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses. The appellants highlighted that they were not given an adequate opportunity to present their defense, which is a violation of their fundamental rights. The appellants further emphasised on their right to a fair trial, which includes the presumption of innocence and the opportunity to defend themselves. It was contended that the trial court&#8217;s actions infringed upon these rights, leading to a miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court examined whether the trial court had complied with the procedural requirements under Section 342 CrPC (J&amp;K) and noted that the accused were not properly informed of their right to lead evidence in their defense, which is a crucial aspect of ensuring a fair trial. The Court recognized the serious procedural lapses in the trial court&#8217;s handling of the case, particularly concerning the examination of the accused under Section 342 CrPC (J&amp;K). The Court reiterated that the purpose of Section 342 CrPC (J&amp;K) is to enable the accused to explain any incriminating circumstances against them, which is vital for the integrity of the trial process and failure to properly examine the accused under this section may result in a serious irregularity that could vitiate the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The accused has a right to be provided an opportunity to adduce any evidence in support of his defence. This right of the accused is a very valuable right which cannot be curtailed in any way. Therefore, a heavy duty is cast upon the Court to see as to whether or not the defence evidence sought to be summoned, is necessary for defending the charge levelled against the accused.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also noted that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574938\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> protects the right of an accused to silence and against self-incrimination. The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt without compelling them to incriminate themselves.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found that the procedural lapses and the resulting prejudice against the accused were serious enough to vitiate the trial. The Court set aside the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings, with the directions to ensure compliance with the necessary legal procedures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nazir Ahmad Mir<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of J&amp;K<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k5OdxKfQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine J&#038;K 638<\/a>, Decided on 22-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. S. N. Ratanpuri, Ms. Fiza Khursheed and Ms. Minsha, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, GA, Mr. R. A. Jan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Suhail Mehraj, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Right to fair trial, presumption of innocence unless proven guilty and proof by the prosecution of its case beyond any reasonable doubt are the fundamentals of our criminal jurisprudence.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":318485,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71964,64142,31425,37965,71955,71963,57471,38070,71962],"class_list":["post-328487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-accuseds-right-to-lead-defense-evidence","tag-article-203","tag-jk-high-court","tag-jammu-and-kashmir-high-court","tag-justice-vinod-chatterji-koul","tag-right-against-self-incrimination","tag-right-of-accused","tag-right-to-fair-trial","tag-section-342-of-crpc-jk"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While setting aside conviction in Acid Attack case, J&amp;K High Court held that Accused&#039;s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed and remands case to Trial Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While setting aside conviction in Acid Attack case, J&amp;K High Court held that Accused&#039;s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed and remands case to Trial Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-12T06:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-16T06:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-12T06:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-16T06:00:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"While setting aside conviction in Acid Attack case, J&K High Court held that Accused's right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed and remands case to Trial Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court | SCC Times","description":"While setting aside conviction in Acid Attack case, J&K High Court held that Accused's right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed and remands case to Trial Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court","og_description":"While setting aside conviction in Acid Attack case, J&K High Court held that Accused's right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed and remands case to Trial Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-12T06:00:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-16T06:00:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/","name":"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-12T06:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-16T06:00:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"While setting aside conviction in Acid Attack case, J&K High Court held that Accused's right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed and remands case to Trial Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/accused-right-to-lead-defense-evidence-jk-hc-sets-aside-conviction-remands-acid-attack-case-to-trial-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cAccused\u2019s right to lead defense evidence cannot be curtailed\u201d; J&amp;K High Court sets aside conviction; remands Acid Attack case to Trial Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":227904,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/04\/appointment-of-3-judges-of-common-high-court-for-union-territory-of-jk-and-ladakh\/","url_meta":{"origin":328487,"position":0},"title":"Appointment of 3 Judges of Common High Court for Union Territory of J&#038;K and Ladakh","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"President appoints the following as the Judges of the Common High Court for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh in order of seniority: Vinod Chatterji Koul Sanjay Dhar Puneet Gupta Ministry of Law and Justice [Notification dt. 03-04-2020]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225958,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/sc-collegium-resolution-elevation-of-3-judicial-officers-as-judges-of-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":328487,"position":1},"title":"SC Collegium Resolution | Elevation of 3 Judicial officers as Judges of J&#038;K HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for elevation of the following Judicial Officers as Judges of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court: 1. Shri Vinod Chatterji Koul, 2. Shri Sanjay Dhar, and 3. Shri Puneet Gupta. Supreme Court of India [Collegium Statement dt. 19-02-2020]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":249383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/07\/law-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":328487,"position":2},"title":"J&#038;K HC | \u201cHeinous offence against serving Law Officer\u201d; HC rejects bail application of convicts who killed Dy. AG, Ajit Singh Dogra","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu And Kashmir High Court: Terming it \u201cheinous\u201d, the Division Bench comprising of Tashi Rabstan and Javed Iqbal Wani, JJ., refused to grant suspension of sentence and bail to the applicants convicted for murder of a Ajit Singh Dogra, Deputy Adv. General. The Bench stated, \u201cThe accused\/applicants have been held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":328487,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J. upheld the finding of the revisional court as it was found to be well reasoned and no abuse of process of law was visible, warranting any interference from the instant Court. The petitioner filed the instant petition under Section 561-A of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":277847,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/22\/jk-and-ladakh-hc-refuses-to-quash-firs-against-the-media-outlet-kashmiryat-and-kashmir-walla-for-publishing-an-article-alleging-use-of-force-by-the-army-for-celebrating-republic-day-at-a-school\/","url_meta":{"origin":328487,"position":4},"title":"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC refuses to quash FIRs against the media outlet Kashmiryat and Kashmir Walla for publishing an article alleging use of force by the Army for celebrating Republic Day at a school","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe High Court, while forming an opinion whether a criminal proceeding or complaint or FIR should be quashed in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, must evaluate whether the ends of justice would justify the exercise of the inherent power\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/jk-ladakh-high-court-pocso-consideration-of-bail-plea-cannot-be-deferred-indefinitely-simply-because-victim-not-appearing-in-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":328487,"position":5},"title":"[POCSO] | Consideration of bail plea cannot be deferred indefinitely simply because the victim is keeping herself away from appearing in Court: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not the case of the prosecution that trial is being delayed because of the conduct of the accused but it is a case where the victim is avoiding stepping into the witness box.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328487\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/318485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}