{"id":328404,"date":"2024-08-09T14:00:41","date_gmt":"2024-08-09T08:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328404"},"modified":"2024-08-13T17:47:50","modified_gmt":"2024-08-13T12:17:50","slug":"delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition under Section 11(6)<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘the Act’) filed by cricketer Yuvraj Singh seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon disputes with respondents, C. Hari Shankar, J., referred the dispute to arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator and observed that invocation of arbitration would not stand effaced just because a party had sought refund.<\/p>\n

Yuvraj Singh filed a petition under Section 11(6)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> for reference of the disputes between the parties to arbitration.<\/p>\n

The disputes arose from an Agreement to Sell dated 05-02-2021 (‘ATS’) that had been executed between the parties.<\/p>\n

Yuvraj Singh contended that the respondents owed certain amounts due to which a notice dated 27-04-2024 was addressed to them, however, no reply was received. After having waited for about a month, the respondent was served with a notice dated 26-05-2024 invoking arbitration.<\/p>\n

The parties, having not been able to arrive at any consensus regarding arbitration, the present petition was moved, further alleging that he had a claim of Rs 1.38 Crores against the respondents.<\/p>\n

It was contended by respondent 2 that though he was a party to the ATS, the subject dispute was between Yuvraj Singh and respondent 1, and that respondent 2 had been made a party unnecessarily.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to SBI General Insurance Co Ltd<\/span> v. Krish Spinning<\/span> 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754<\/a> wherein it had been held that under Section 11(6)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, Court should only decide whether there exists an arbitration agreement between the parties and whether the Section 11(6) petition had been filed within three years of the Section 21 notice.<\/p>\n

The Court said there existed an arbitration agreement between the parties in the present case, and that whether respondent 2 was to be deleted from the array of parties was to be decided by the arbitral Tribunal.<\/p>\n

Respondent 1 had pointed out after issuance of the Section 21 notice, Yuvraj Singh had written to the respondents seeking refund of certain amounts, therefore, such request of refund would evince his intention to not proceed with arbitration. However, the Court said that such a contention by respondent 1 was unacceptable and said, “invoking arbitration does not stand effaced merely because the petitioners sought refund from the respondents<\/span>”. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on merits and said the same would be open to be adjudicated by the arbitral tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Court said that the necessary ingredients of Section 11(6) clearly existed in the instant case, and accordingly, referred the disputes between the parties to arbitration, and appointed a sole arbitrator.<\/p>\n

The Court concluded that all questions of fact and law are left open to be adjudicated in the arbitral proceedings. The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and would abide by its rules and regulations.<\/p>\n

[Yuvraj Singh Bundhel v. Brillient Etoile Pvt. Ltd., 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5319<\/a>, decided on 05-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Advocates for petitioners: Rizwan, Sachi Chopra, Azadar Husain, Nistha Sinha, V. Anand, Yashi Bajpai, Advocates<\/p>\n

Advocates for respondents: Neeraj Singh, Gulati, Vijay Nair, Manoranjan Sharma, Manmeet Singh Nagpal, Advocates<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Deletion of party is an issue to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, it cannot be looked into by the Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71922,35672,43926,71920,2543,68986,70230,71919,71921],"class_list":["post-328404","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment-of-arbitrtor","tag-arbitral-tribunal","tag-arbitration-act","tag-deletion-of-parties","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-c-hari-shankar","tag-section-11-of-arbitration-act","tag-section-116-of-arbitration-act","tag-yuvraj-singh"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court referred disputes between cricketer Yuvraj Singh to arbitration and deletion of party from the array of parties was an issue to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court referred disputes between cricketer Yuvraj Singh to arbitration and deletion of party from the array of parties was an issue to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-09T08:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-13T12:17:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-09T08:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-13T12:17:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court referred disputes between cricketer Yuvraj Singh to arbitration and deletion of party from the array of parties was an issue to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court referred disputes between cricketer Yuvraj Singh to arbitration and deletion of party from the array of parties was an issue to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores","og_description":"Delhi High Court referred disputes between cricketer Yuvraj Singh to arbitration and deletion of party from the array of parties was an issue to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-09T08:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-13T12:17:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","name":"Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-09T08:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-13T12:17:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court referred disputes between cricketer Yuvraj Singh to arbitration and deletion of party from the array of parties was an issue to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":330009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/roundup-top-case-laws-on-arbitration-july-august-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":328404,"position":0},"title":"Top cases on Arbitration Law from July to August 2024","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick recap of the latest rulings on Arbitration Law by the High Courts.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitration Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/27\/delhi-high-court-states-effect-of-res-judicata-on-section-11-of-arbitration-act-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":328404,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court clarifies the position of Res Judicata with respect to Section 11 of the Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court was of the view that it would be within its right to dismiss the petition at the threshold if the petition is not maintainable, otherwise an unacceptable position of law would arise where despite a petition being not maintainable due to lack of territorial jurisdiction would need\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/16\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-arbitral-award-by-arbitrator-de-jure-inability-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":328404,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside arbitral award passed by Arbitrator having de jure inability to pass the award","author":"Arunima","date":"June 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ineligibility of an Arbitrator goes to the root of his jurisdiction and the Arbitral Award cannot be considered as valid.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-update-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996-section-116-section-152-section-21\/","url_meta":{"origin":328404,"position":3},"title":"Jharkhand High Court | Maintainability of application under S. 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of substitute arbitrator","author":"Editor","date":"November 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jharkhand High Court: While allowing the application under Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) for appointment of substitute arbitrator, a single judge bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. held that since first arbitrator was appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after the applicant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":341763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/18\/dhc-appoints-justice-arvind-sangwan-as-sole-arbitrator-in-petition-filed-by-dixon-technologies\/","url_meta":{"origin":328404,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC appoints Justice Arvind Sangwan as sole arbitrator in a petition filed by Dixon Technologies","author":"Arushi","date":"February 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre and would abide by its rules and regulations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/rajasthan-hc-seat-of-arbitration-has-exclusive-jurisdiction-for-applications-filed-u-s-11-of-the-ac-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":328404,"position":5},"title":"Seat of arbitration once fixed by the arbitration agreement, has the exclusive jurisdiction for applications u\/s 11 of the A&C Act, 1996: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court observes that the \u2018contrary indicia\u2019 is clearly reflected in the present case, because the seat was mentioned as Bikaner and venue was mentioned as New Delhi.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328404","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328404"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328404\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328404"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328404"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328404"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}