{"id":328153,"date":"2024-08-06T13:00:50","date_gmt":"2024-08-06T07:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328153"},"modified":"2024-08-09T09:42:36","modified_gmt":"2024-08-09T04:12:36","slug":"chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganwadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/span> In a petition challenging the legality and validity of the order dated 25-02-2014 passed by the Collector, Rajnandgaon (&#8216;Collector&#8217;) and order dated 01-01-2015, passed by the Commissioner, Durg (&#8216;Commissioner&#8217;), whereby the appointment of the petitioner was cancelled and in her place Respondent 6 was appointed, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Goutam Bhaduri, J.<\/span>, opined that when the petitioner was appointed, certain right had accrued in her favour, and how after two years without any opportunity of hearing her services were terminated, had not been explained. Thus, the Court stated that there was a clear violation of principles of natural justice and the rules or audi alteram partem was given a go-bye. When the right had accrued in favour of a candidate, dispensing the services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violated rules of natural justice. Thus, the Court set aside the order dated 01-01-2015 passed by the Commissioner and 25-02-2014, passed by the Collector and consequently, also set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner&#8217;s appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, pursuant to an advertisement dated 04-10-2010, issued by Respondent 5, petitioner applied for the post of Anganwadi Sahayika for Kumhalori Village. On completion of the selection process, the petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Sahayika on 23-11-2011 for Ward 2 of Kumhalori Village. Likewise, another woman\/candidate namely, &#8216;S&#8217; was appointed for Ward 1. Thereafter, one of the unsuccessful candidates, challenged the appointment of &#8216;S&#8217; before the Collector on the ground that the marks had wrongly been given contrary to the guidelines issued by the State on 02-04-2008.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the removal order was passed, and the petitioner was not heard, and her services were removed on 24-06-2013 and Respondent 6 was appointed on the same date in place of the petitioner. The said appointment was challenged by the petitioner before the Collector in an appeal and the said appeal was dismissed on 25-02-2014. Subsequently, the revision against the order was also filed before the Divisional Commissioner, which was again dismissed vide order dated 01-01-2015. Thus, the present petition was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner contended that the initial order by which the petitioner was removed, she was not given any opportunity of hearing and Respondent 6 was appointed. The petitioner contended that both the Collector and Commissioner failed to take into note of the said fact. Therefore, petitioner prayed that order of the Collector and Commissioner to be set aside and the appointment of Respondent 6 be annulled instead the petitioner be appointed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the perusal of the record showed that the pursual to the advertisement, the petitioner was appointed at Ward 2 of Kumhalori Village. Further, one unsuccessful candidate, challenged the appointment of &#8216;S&#8217;, who was appointed for Ward 1 on various grounds. While deciding the appeal filed by the unsuccessful candidate, the Collector directed that all the applications of Kumhalori village should be scrutinized and afresh orders would be passed. However, the order of appointment of the petitioner, was not under any challenge and in this dispute, the petitioner was not a party.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the perusal of the inspection report did not show that while such scrutiny was carried out, the petitioner, who was already appointed was given an opportunity of hearing. When the petitioner was appointed, certain right had accrued in her favour, and how after two years without any opportunity of hearing her services were terminated, had not been explained. Thus, the Court stated that there was a clear violation of principles of natural justice and the rules or audi alteram partem was given a go-bye. When the right had accrued in favour of a candidate, dispensing the services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violated rules of natural justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that before passing any adverse order, minimum opportunity of hearing should be given to the petitioner. The apprehension of the petitioner that there was a bias, was to be gathered from surrounding circumstances and the necessary conclusion was required to be drawn. The term &#8220;bias&#8221; was used to denote a departure from the standing of even-handed justice. The Court applied the principles laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDE5ODcpIDQgU0NDIDYxMSYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1987) 4 SCC 611<\/a>, and opined that it appeared that there was a clear violation of the rules of natural justice and even the matter was subject of challenge. The Court stated both the authorities, Collector and the Commissioner deliberated on a different issue without touching the nucleus of the challenge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court set aside the order dated 01-01-2015 passed by the Commissioner and 25-02-2014, passed by the Collector and consequently, also set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner&#8217;s appointment. The Court stated that the Chief Executive Officer, Janpand Panchayat, Rajnandgaon was at liberty to carry out the scrutiny again based on the documents which were prevailing for the petitioner&#8217;s appointment and Respondent 6 and might pass the suitable orders after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Anusuiya Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/05tZl16O\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Chh 6835<\/a>, decided on 23-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Abhishek Sharma, Advocate;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> R.K. Gupta, Addl. AG; Pallav Mishra, Advocate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In the administrative action where the decision of authority may result in civil consequences, a hearing before taking a decision is necessary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":315373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71780,6111,21444,30591,71768,2805,34246],"class_list":["post-328153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-anganwadi-sahayika","tag-appointment","tag-audi-alteram-partem","tag-chhattisgarh-high-court","tag-justice-goutam-bhaduri","tag-natural_justice","tag-opportunity-of-hearing"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates rules of natural justice: Chhattisgarh High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and the Collector and set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner\u2019s appointment.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganbadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and the Collector and set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner\u2019s appointment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-06T07:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-09T04:12:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganwadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/\",\"name\":\"Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates rules of natural justice: Chhattisgarh High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-06T07:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-09T04:12:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and the Collector and set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner\u2019s appointment.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Chhattisgarh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganwadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates rules of natural justice: Chhattisgarh High Court | SCC Times","description":"Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and the Collector and set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner\u2019s appointment.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganbadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and the Collector and set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner\u2019s appointment.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-06T07:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-09T04:12:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganwadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/","name":"Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates rules of natural justice: Chhattisgarh High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-06T07:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-09T04:12:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and the Collector and set aside the appointment order of Respondent 6 and cancellation of the petitioner\u2019s appointment.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Chhattisgarh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/chhat-hc-dispensing-services-without-giving-any-opportunity-of-hearing-violates-rules-of-natural-justice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Dispensing services without giving any opportunity of hearing clearly violates natural justice\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC sets aside cancellation of Anganwadi Sahayika\u2019s appointment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":7295,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/17\/additional-judges-of-the-chhattisgarh-high-court-appointed-by-the-president\/","url_meta":{"origin":328153,"position":0},"title":"Additional Judges of the Chhattisgarh High Court appointed by the President","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The President of India appointed (1); Shri Goutam Bhaduri, (2) Shri Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, and (3) Shri Puthichira Sam Koshy, as Additional Judges of the Chhattisgarh High Court, for a period of three months with effect from 16-9-2015. \u00a0 -Ministry of Law & Justice","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/16\/interim-relief-in-nature-of-final-order-cannot-be-granted-madhya-pradesh-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":328153,"position":1},"title":"Interim relief in nature of final order cannot be granted: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anand Pathak, J., filed against an order where appointment of petitioner was put on hold. Facts of the case are that petitioner and respondent applied for a post of Anganwadi worker at Gram Panchayat where\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299941,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/chhatisgarh-hc-excessive-drinking-habit-by-the-husband-amounts-to-mental-cruelty-against-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":328153,"position":2},"title":"Excessive drinking habit by the husband amounts to mental cruelty against wife and the entire family: Chhattisgarh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe concept of maintenance grant was to ensure that the wife and the children of the husband were not left in a state of destitution after the divorce .\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/17\/reinstatement-after-alleged-misconduct-removed-cannot-be-treated-as-re-employment-chhattisgarh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":328153,"position":3},"title":"Reinstatement in service after alleged misconduct is removed cannot be treated as re-employment: Chhattisgarh HC grants consequential benefits deprived to employee","author":"Arushi","date":"August 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If the Government servant has been terminated without adhering to Article 311 of the Constitution, then in such a case the provisions cannot be interpreted in favour of the State to deprive the employee of his legitimate claim.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":328153,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Goutam Bhaduri, J. dismissed the petition as being devoid of merit. The facts are such that the petitioner was accused of treating 1400 children of 6 villages by placing wire on teeth in order to get the advantage of the government scheme. The petitioner used the scheme\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":89181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/03\/principles-of-natural-justice-and-fair-play-in-action-are-integral-part-of-good-administration\/","url_meta":{"origin":328153,"position":5},"title":"Principles of natural justice and fair play in action are integral part of good administration","author":"Saba","date":"December 3, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Madhya Pradesh: The Court while examining the legality and validity of the order dated 28.12.2015, whereby the respondents have cancelled the appointment of the petitioner as Chairperson of Child Welfare Committee, Bhopal, without giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, the Bench comprising of Sujoy Paul,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328153\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}