{"id":328116,"date":"2024-08-06T10:00:07","date_gmt":"2024-08-06T04:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=328116"},"modified":"2024-08-09T09:44:36","modified_gmt":"2024-08-09T04:14:36","slug":"waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> While deciding whether the property declared as an ancient and protected monument under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840982\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904<\/a> can also be declared as waqf property under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002835345\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Waqf Act, 1995<\/a> (Waqf Act), a single-judge bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., held that the property in concern cannot be reclassified as Wakf property without following the procedures under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840982\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner filed a petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> seeking to call for records from respondent No.3 and its subordinate authorities, quash the impugned order dated 19-07-2013 which declared certain properties as waqf properties and declare the property Khasra No.433, Village Emagird, District Burhanpur as the petitioner&#8217;s property. The property in question, which includes ancient monuments like the Tomb of Shah Shuja, Tomb of Nadir Shah, and Bibi Sahib&#8217;s Masjid, had been declared as protected under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840982\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904<\/a> and this declaration was affirmed by subsequent notifications under the same Act. The CEO, M.P. Waqf Board, by an order dated 19-07-2013 declared these protected monuments as waqf property, which led to the current dispute. The main issue is whether the property declared as an ancient and protected monument under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act can also be declared as waqf property under the Waqf Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the property in question, having been declared an ancient monument under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, cannot be reclassified as waqf property. It was contended that Section 11 of the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act mandates that the Commissioner retains guardianship of such properties unless relinquished as per Section 14 of the Waqf Act. The petitioner cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karnataka Board of Wakf<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Government of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/z40F4nj6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2004) 10 SCC 779<\/a> and contended that the Waqf Act cannot override the protections afforded by the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act. However, the respondents contended that since the property was declared as waqf property, thus the CEO&#8217;s order directing the petitioner to vacate was justified. It was contended that the impugned order under challenge is appealable, and the petitioner should have approached the Waqf Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the property had been declared an ancient and protected monument under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act and such designation places the property under the guardianship of the Commissioner, with conditions for its release specified in the Act. The Court found that there was no evidence showing that the Commissioner had relinquished guardianship over the property, nor was there any provision indicating that the notifications under Ancient Monuments Preservation Act can be nullified by later waqf notifications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karnataka Board of Wakf<\/span> (Supra), the Court held that the government&#8217;s ownership and control over the property as an ancient monument could not be overridden by a subsequent waqf declaration. The Court stated that the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act takes precedence over the Waqf Act concerning properties declared as ancient monuments. The Court further held that the Waqf Board had no jurisdiction over the property already under guardianship as an ancient monument.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the order dated 19-07-2013 by the CEO, M.P. Waqf Board, which sought to reclassify the property as waqf, was erroneous and lacked legal basis. The Court affirmed the property&#8217;s status as an ancient monument under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act and rejected its classification as waqf property and hence, quashed and set aside the impugned order and declared the property in concern as not being waqf property and was to remain under the guardianship of the Central Government as per the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Archaeological Survey of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Chief Executive Officer<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GI3dYFS1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 5093<\/a>, Decided on 26-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri K.N. Pethia, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Ukarsh Agrawal, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Ms. Sabhyata Yadav, Counsel for the Respondent No. 2<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court noted that the property in question, which includes ancient monuments like the Tomb of Shah Shuja, Tomb of Nadir Shah, and Bibi Sahib&#8217;s Masjid, had been declared as protected under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71762,71760,71759,61228,7201,71758,71757,64535,71761],"class_list":["post-328116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ancient-monuments","tag-ancient-monuments-preservation-act","tag-bibi-sahibs-masjid","tag-justice-g-s-ahluwalia","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-tomb-of-nadir-shah","tag-tomb-of-shah-shuja","tag-waqf-act","tag-waqf-board-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an ancient monument: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court held that the Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an \u2018ancient monument\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court held that the Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an \u2018ancient monument\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-06T04:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-09T04:14:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an ancient monument: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-06T04:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-09T04:14:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court held that the Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an \u2018ancient monument\u2019\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an ancient monument: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court held that the Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an \u2018ancient monument\u2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court held that the Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an \u2018ancient monument\u2019","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-06T04:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-09T04:14:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an ancient monument: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-06T04:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-09T04:14:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court held that the Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as an \u2018ancient monument\u2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":345302,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/06\/government-issues-waqf-amendment-act-2025-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":328116,"position":0},"title":"Waqf (Amendment) Bill receives President&#8217;s assent; Waqf Act, 1995 will now be known as UMEED Act, 1995","author":"Kriti","date":"April 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Waqf Council will now compulsorily have 2 women members and 2 non-muslim members.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Waqf (Amendment) Bill","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Waqf-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Waqf-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Waqf-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Waqf-Amendment-Bill.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342620,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/01\/s-85-of-waqf-act-waqf-tribunal-has-exclusive-jurisdiction-over-disputes-once-property-qualifies-as-waqf-by-user-raj-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":328116,"position":1},"title":"S. 85 of Waqf Act | Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes once a property qualifies as \u2018Waqf by user\u2019: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not disputed that Masjid is a place used for religious purpose for praying Namaz etc., therefore, it comes within the definition of \u2018Waqf\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/05\/explained-jurisdiction-under-waqf-act-1995-civil-court-versus-tribunal\/","url_meta":{"origin":328116,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Jurisdiction under Waqf Act, 1995: Civil Court versus Tribunal","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo say that the Tribunal will have jurisdiction only if the subject property is disputed to be a waqf property and not if it is admitted to be a waqf property, is indigestible in the teeth of Section 83(1) of the Waqf Act.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/supreme-court-landmark-verdict-waqf-amendment-act-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":328116,"position":3},"title":"Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court\u2019s Landmark Ruling Explained","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe grounds on which a legislation can be declared invalid is with regard to the legislative competence of legislature or that such a legislation is in contravention of any of the fundamental rights stipulated in Part III of the Constitution or any other provision of the Constitution or that it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Waqf Amendment Act 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Waqf-Amendment-Act-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Waqf-Amendment-Act-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Waqf-Amendment-Act-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Waqf-Amendment-Act-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/waqf-tribunal-has-no-jurisdiction-to-decide-suit-pending-in-civil-court-before-commencement-of-wakf-act-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":328116,"position":4},"title":"Waqf Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide pre-Waqf Act suits pending before civil courts: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 7(5) of the Waqf Act, 1995 states that the Wakf Tribunal does not have jurisdiction over matters that were already the subject of a suit or proceeding in a civil court before the commencement of the Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353854,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/19\/jk-hc-holds-if-waqf-tribunal-absent-civil-court-can-decide-waqf-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":328116,"position":5},"title":"In absence of Waqf Tribunal, Civil Courts have jurisdiction to entertain waqf disputes: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven in a case where there is an express bar for exercising jurisdiction by the civil courts, the consideration as to the scheme of the statute in question and the adequacy or sufficiency of the remedy provided, is permissible in law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"civil court can decide waqf dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=328116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328116\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=328116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=328116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=328116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}