{"id":327979,"date":"2024-08-03T16:30:15","date_gmt":"2024-08-03T11:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327979"},"modified":"2024-08-07T17:58:58","modified_gmt":"2024-08-07T12:28:58","slug":"judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a special leave petition filed against the judgment and order of the division bench of the Delhi High Court, wherein the Court remand the proceedings to the Single Judge for reconsidering the petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996<\/a>, observing that the validity of the award of refund and the grant of interest appears in the context of examining the correctness of the judgment rendered by the Single Judge alone, the Three Judge Bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ. while agreeing with the reasoning which led the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court to remand the proceedings to the Single Judge, said that interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 must be confined to the grounds which are permissible under the statute. But equally, the Judge hearing an application under Section 34 must apply their mind to the grounds of challenge and then deduce as to whether a case for interference within the parameters of Section 34 has been made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After perusing the Single Judge order, the Court remarked that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">there is no discernible reason which has weighed with the Single Judge. There has been no consideration of the arguments which were urged before the Single Judge<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After noting the impugned Judgment, the Court viewed that the Division Bench did not err in remitting the proceedings to the Single Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the facts and circumstances, the Court requested the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to assign the hearing of the petition under Section 34 to a Judge other than the Judge who heard and passed the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court clarified that since the Division Bench of the High Court has remanded the proceedings to the Single Judge for reconsidering the petition under Section 34 which order has been affirmed by this Court, all the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kalanithi Maran v Ajay Singh, Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14936\/2024, decided on 26-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Adv. Ms. Hiral Gupta, Adv. Ms. Bhumika Kapoor, Adv. ,Ms. Sukanya Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Seem, Adv. M\/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Ms. Nandini Gore, Adv. Ms. Sonia Nigam, Adv. Mr. Rajat Dasgupta, Adv. Mr. Akarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rangasaran Mohan, Adv. M\/s. Karanjawala &amp; Co.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, AOR Mr. Goutham Shivashankar, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma A S, Adv. Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Manan Shishodia, Adv. Mr. Prakhar Agarwal, Adv<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/F4la5G5g\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1876<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Kalanithi Maran<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Ajay Singh<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Adv. Ms. Hiral Gupta, Adv. Ms. Bhumika Kapoor, Adv. ,Ms. Sukanya Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Seem, Adv. M\/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Ms. Nandini Gore, Adv. Ms. Sonia Nigam, Adv. Mr. Rajat Dasgupta, Adv. Mr. Akarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rangasaran Mohan, Adv. M\/s. Karanjawala &amp; Co.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, AOR Mr. Goutham Shivashankar, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma A S, Adv. Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Manan Shishodia, Adv. Mr. Prakhar Agarwal, Adv<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/4.-chandrachud-modified-1.png\" alt=\"Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/WhatsApp-Image-2022-05-09-at-6.14.52-PM-modified.png\" alt=\"J.B. Pardiwala, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">J.B. Pardiwala, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Manoj-Misra-Circle.png\" alt=\"Manoj Misra, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Manoj Misra, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png\" alt=\"arbitration and conciliation act, 1996\" width=\"191\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294803\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png 191w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-38x60.png 38w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 191px) 100vw, 191px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Supreme Court requested the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to assign the hearing of the petition under Section 34 to a Judge other than the Judge who heard and passed the impugned order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":327985,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[71683,2633,2543,61989,71682,49365,55018,15391,71681,5363],"class_list":["post-327979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-application-for-setting-aside-arbitral-awards","tag-arbitral_award","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-dr-justice-dy-chandrachud","tag-grounds-of-challenge","tag-justice-j-b-pardiwala","tag-justice-manoj-misra","tag-remand","tag-s-34-arbitration-act","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SC upheld Delhi HC order remanding matter to Single Judge and said that Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SC upheld Delhi HC order remanding matter to Single Judge and said that Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-03T11:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-07T12:28:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"headline\":\"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-03T11:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-07T12:28:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":468,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Application for setting aside arbitral awards\",\"arbitral award\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"Dr Justice DY Chandrachud\",\"grounds of challenge\",\"Justice J.B. Pardiwala\",\"Justice Manoj Misra\",\"remand\",\"S. 34 Arbitration Act\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-03T11:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-07T12:28:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"SC upheld Delhi HC order remanding matter to Single Judge and said that Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"S. 34 Arbitration Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/03\\\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019: SC | SCC Times","description":"SC upheld Delhi HC order remanding matter to Single Judge and said that Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC","og_description":"SC upheld Delhi HC order remanding matter to Single Judge and said that Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-03T11:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-07T12:28:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/"},"author":{"name":"Apoorva","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"headline":"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC","datePublished":"2024-08-03T11:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-07T12:28:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/"},"wordCount":468,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp","keywords":["Application for setting aside arbitral awards","arbitral award","Delhi High Court","Dr Justice DY Chandrachud","grounds of challenge","Justice J.B. Pardiwala","Justice Manoj Misra","remand","S. 34 Arbitration Act","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/","name":"\u2018Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-03T11:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-07T12:28:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"SC upheld Delhi HC order remanding matter to Single Judge and said that Judge hearing S. 34 application must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required\u2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"S. 34 Arbitration Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/judge-hearing-s-34-application-must-apply-mind-to-grounds-of-challenge-deduce-whether-interference-required-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judge hearing application under S. 34 Arbitration Act must apply mind to grounds of challenge and deduce whether interference is required: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-34-Arbitration-Act.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327979\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/327985"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}