{"id":327797,"date":"2024-08-01T17:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-08-01T11:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327797"},"modified":"2024-08-06T10:17:58","modified_gmt":"2024-08-06T04:47:58","slug":"whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed by the wife against order of the Family Court dismissing her application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;) for dismissal of the divorce petition filed by the husband, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajiv Shakdher*<\/span> and Amit Bansal, JJ., dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was asserted by the wife that the divorce petition filed by the husband was pivoted on the grounds of cruelty, desertion, and adultery. It was further submitted by the wife that the pre-requites for desertion under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13(1)(ib)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> (&#8216;HMA&#8217;) had not been fulfilled as divorce could be granted on the ground of desertion only if the wife would have deserted the husband for not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. It was submitted by the wife that she cohabited with the husband till July 2022 and the petition was filed on 25-05-2024, therefore, the ground of desertion under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13 (1) (ib)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HMA Act<\/a> for grant of divorce was not available to the husband. The husband, on the contrary, argued that the wife had deserted him since November 2021.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was further contended by the wife that as far as the ground for adultery was concerned, the person with whom the wife allegedly had an adulterous relationship had not been arrayed as a party, hence, the plaint was liable to be rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that although the contention of the wife was correct that even if November 2021 was assumed to be the date of desertion, the ground would still not be available to the husband as the divorce petition was filed only in May 2023, it could not have led to rejection of the divorce petition on the ground of cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Manjul Joshi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhavna Khurana<\/span><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. 2024: DHC:4170-DB\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>, wherein it had been observed that a divorce action was a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">lis<\/span> centred around the couple who had entered into matrimony, and a third party, who did not have the status of a spouse, had no locus to intervene or seek impleadment in such a cause. The Court said that the alleged adulterer (third party) could either be summoned as a witness or other evidence could be placed before the Family Court to prove adultery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In concluding that the application preferred under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> was not sustainable, the Family Court reasoned that the divorce petition could not be rejected merely because a part of the cause of action was not viable in law if the Court otherwise had jurisdiction to entertain the action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said although the wife did not dispute the assertions of cruelty as levelled by the husband in the divorce petition, however, if taken on a standalone basis, it could not lead to dismissal of the divorce petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that since the allegations concerning cruelty had been embedded in the divorce petition, it could be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Geetha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nanjundaswamy<\/span><a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1407\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a>, wherein it had been held that the plaint as presented must either be proceed with as a whole or be rejected as a whole but not in part.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the given circumstances, the Court dismissed the appeal, being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. Y., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mEWjvu0r\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 5078<\/a>, decided on 16-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Rajiv Shakdher.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocates for the appellant:<\/span> Prateek Goswami, Dhiraj Goswami, Shashank Goswami, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> 2024: DHC:4170-DB<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0x2axUt1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"Times New Roman&quot;;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1407<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The Court said the Family Court judge was correct in holding that divorce petition could not be rejected merely because a part of the cause of action was not viable in law if the Court otherwise had jurisdiction to entertain the action, and therefore, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 was not sustainable.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,2846,70893,61061,71605,71604],"class_list":["post-327797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-divorce","tag-justice-amit-bansal","tag-justice-rajiv-shakdher","tag-order-7-rule-11-of-cpc","tag-rejection-of-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Whether petition can be rejected in part upon application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-01T11:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-06T04:47:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/\",\"name\":\"Whether petition can be rejected in part upon application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-01T11:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-06T04:47:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Whether petition can be rejected in part upon application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers","og_description":"Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-01T11:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-06T04:47:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/","name":"Whether petition can be rejected in part upon application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-01T11:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-06T04:47:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and stated that a petition could not be rejected in a piecemeal manner upon an application being moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/whether-petition-can-be-rejected-in-part-upon-application-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-dhc-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether a petition can be rejected in part upon an application being moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC? Delhi HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299744,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/delhi-hc-directs-family-court-judges-to-judiciously-use-legal-provisions-expeditious-disposal-petitions\/","url_meta":{"origin":327797,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Family Court Judges to judiciously use the legal provisions for expeditious disposal of petitions","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cScrupulous adherence to Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 can curtail litigation like the present one, which aside from clogging the litigation also keeps the parties embroiled in litigation with a false hope of some relief.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/17\/del-hc-husband-citizen-and-domicile-of-usa-can-he-raise-objections-on-divorce-proceedings-filed-by-wife-in-india-court-decrypts-the-law-in-light-of-catena-of-scs-decisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":327797,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Husband citizen and domicile of USA, Can he raise objections on divorce proceedings filed by wife in India? Court decrypts the law in light of catena of SC&#8217;s decisions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., while observing a matrimonial application, observed that, The plaint must be read as a whole to determine as to whether it discloses a cause of action. In the instant matter, the husband\/appellant sought to challenge the Order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/08\/del-hc-wifes-application-for-setting-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-rejected-in-absence-of-application-for-condonation-of-more-than-4-years-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":327797,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Wife&#8217;s application for setting aside ex-parte divorce decree rejected in absence of application for condonation of more than 4 years&#8217; delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-wife against the order of the family court rejecting her application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte decree of divorce passed in favour of her husband. The parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":333382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-bids-adieu-to-justice-rajiv-shakdher-legal-research-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327797,"position":3},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court bids adieu to Justice Rajiv Shakdher after a brief tenure of 24 days as its 29th Chief Justice","author":"Ritu","date":"October 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Rajiv Shakdher's distinguished career spans several decades of dedicated service to the legal profession and the judiciary. His expertise in commercial, corporate, and taxation law, combined with his administrative experience, has earned him a reputation as a forward-thinking and capable Judge.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Rajiv Shakdher","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Justice-Rajiv-Shakdher.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Justice-Rajiv-Shakdher.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Justice-Rajiv-Shakdher.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Justice-Rajiv-Shakdher.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/del-hc-dismisses-revision-petition-to-challenge-order-performance-oral-agreement-to-sell-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":327797,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses Revision Petition to challenge Order by ADJ holding suit for specific performance of oral agreement to sell maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018It is no longer res integra that to determine an application under Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, it is only averments made in the plaint that can be considered.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306269,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/03\/part-rejection-of-plaint-impermissible-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":327797,"position":5},"title":"Part rejection of plaint impermissible under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"November 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe approach adopted by the High Court is incorrect and contrary to the well-entrenched principles of considering an application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Part rejection of plaint","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Part-rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Part-rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Part-rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Part-rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327797\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}