{"id":327786,"date":"2024-08-01T15:00:15","date_gmt":"2024-08-01T09:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327786"},"modified":"2024-08-06T10:21:17","modified_gmt":"2024-08-06T04:51:17","slug":"in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR dated 01-06-2023 registered with the Tilak Nagar Police Station, Brihanmumbai City for offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Corresponding Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (&#8216;BNS&#8217;)\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561742\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">406<\/a><a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Section 316(2) of the BNS\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a><a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. Section 352 of the BNS\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a><a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. Section 3(5) of the BNS\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), the consequent charge-sheet and criminal proceedings pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 34th Court, Vikroli, Mumbai. The Division Bench of A.S. Gadkari and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. Neela Gokhale*<\/span>, JJ., opined that the act to compel the complainant to show the house cleaned by her on WhatsApp video call was a sadist manner of ill-treatment. The Court dismissed the petition and refused to quash the FIR and consequent criminal proceedings, as the allegations in the FIR, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> disclosed commission of the alleged offences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant married Petitioner 1 and started residing at the matrimonial home along with him and her father-in-law, Petitioners 1 and 2, respectively. The complainant stated that the three sisters-in-law, i.e., Petitioners 3, 4, and 5, although residing in their separate houses, interfered in the household of Petitioner 1, like, her sisters-in-law deliberately removed the house help from Petitioner 1&#8217;s house and directed the complainant to do all the household work herself. They directed her to show them via WhatsApp video call the house as cleaned by her and persistently directed her by text messages regarding what she should make for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. They made a WhatsApp group comprising of all petitioners where, they used to berate the complainant and complained about her to Petitioner 1. Even Petitioner 1 abused her, dug up quarrels on petty issues, suspected her character and even abused her. He also refused to have conjugal relations with the complainant on the pretext that he was diabetic.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">One day, all three sisters-in-law came to Petitioner 1&#8217;s house and abused the complainant in filthy language and asked her to leave the house, demanded gifts, etc. from her parents and drove her out of the house. It was stated that they retained all the jewellery comprising the complainant&#8217;s &#8216;stridhan&#8217; and refused to return the same. Thus, the complainant registered the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the complainant was pitted against the might of petitioners, who were abusing and ill-treating her on petty issues and their sole aim appeared to be to extort money from her and her parents. The Court observed that even after driving the complainant out of the matrimonial home, they had refused to hand over her &#8216;stridhan&#8217; comprising of valuable jewellery and her articles.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the allegations against the sisters-in-law pertaining to compelling the complainant to show them the house cleaned by her on WhatsApp video call was a sadistic manner of ill-treatment. The Court stated that such acts were enough to cause apprehension in the mind of the complainant that there was danger to her life and limb at the hands of petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Priyanka Jaiswal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Jharkhand<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 685<\/a>, and opined that under the extraordinary jurisdiction of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, the High Court must not conduct a mini trial at the time of hearing a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> for quashing of the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the allegations in the FIR, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> disclosed commission of the alleged offences. Thus, the Court dismissed the petition and refused to quash the FIR and the consequent criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Hardik Prakash Shah v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nRf1V1WD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 2441<\/a>, decided on 22-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> Vrushabh Savla, Counsel<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> V. N. Sagare, APP; Prerak P. Chaudhary, Counsel<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Corresponding Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803775\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">85<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803776\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">86<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (&#8216;BNS&#8217;)<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803674\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">316(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BNS<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803714\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">352<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BNS<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803655\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(5)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BNS<\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The complainant was pitted against the might of petitioners, i.e., husband, father-in-law, and three sisters-in-law, who were abusing and ill-treating her on petty issues and their sole aim was to extort money from her and her parents.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,2570,3067,68043,71597,71596,7781,4071],"class_list":["post-327786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-Cruelty","tag-FIR","tag-justice-a-s-gadkari","tag-justice-dr-neela-gokhale","tag-sadist-ill-treatment","tag-section-498-a","tag-stridhan"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court refuses to quash FIR registered under Section 498-A of IPC and held that the in-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call was a sadist ill-treatment.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court refuses to quash FIR registered under Section 498-A of IPC and held that the in-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call was a sadist ill-treatment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-01T09:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-06T04:51:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"headline\":\"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-01T09:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-06T04:51:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":658,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"Cruelty\",\"FIR\",\"Justice A.S. Gadkari\",\"Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale\",\"sadist ill-treatment\",\"section 498-A\",\"stridhan\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/\",\"name\":\"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-01T09:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-06T04:51:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court refuses to quash FIR registered under Section 498-A of IPC and held that the in-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call was a sadist ill-treatment.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/01\\\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court refuses to quash FIR registered under Section 498-A of IPC and held that the in-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call was a sadist ill-treatment.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR","og_description":"Bombay High Court refuses to quash FIR registered under Section 498-A of IPC and held that the in-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call was a sadist ill-treatment.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-01T09:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-06T04:51:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/"},"author":{"name":"Simranjeet","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"headline":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR","datePublished":"2024-08-01T09:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-06T04:51:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/"},"wordCount":658,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","keywords":["Bombay High Court","Cruelty","FIR","Justice A.S. Gadkari","Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale","sadist ill-treatment","section 498-A","stridhan"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/","name":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-01T09:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-06T04:51:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court refuses to quash FIR registered under Section 498-A of IPC and held that the in-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call was a sadist ill-treatment.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/in-laws-asking-daughter-in-law-to-show-cleaned-house-on-video-call-sadist-ill-treatment-bomhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[S. 498-A] \u2018In-laws asking daughter-in-law to show them the house cleaned by her on video call is a sadist manner of ill-treatment\u2019; Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327786"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327786\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}