{"id":327773,"date":"2024-08-01T12:30:15","date_gmt":"2024-08-01T07:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327773"},"modified":"2024-08-01T12:47:40","modified_gmt":"2024-08-01T07:17:40","slug":"sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a civil appeal, the seven Judge Constitution Bench comprising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI, B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, Bela M. Trivedi, Pankaj Mithal, Manoj Misra, and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ., by a majority of 6:1 held that sub-classification of Scheduled Castes among reserved categories is permissible for granting separate quotas for more backwards within the SC categories. However, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissented holding that such sub-classification is not permissible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The majority overruled a five-judge Bench decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">E.V. Chinnaiah<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of A.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/yM56y26X\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2005) 1 SCC 394<\/a>, whereby it was held that sub-classification of SC\/STs is not permissible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the power of States for sub-classification of SC\/STs was upheld.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 1975, the Punjab Government issued a notification dividing its existing 25% reservation for SCs into two categories. Half of these seats were reserved for the SC category were to be offered to Balmikis and Mazhabi Sikhs. The other half of the reserved seats was for the remaining groups within the SC category. This notification continued to remain in effect for 31 years, until the Supreme Court&#8217;s five-judge bench decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">E.V. Chinnaiah<\/span> (supra) set aside a similar law in Andhra Pradesh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The 5-Judge Bench in EV Chinnaiah (supra) had held that the Scheduled Castes form homogenous classes and there cannot be any sub-division, and that such sub-classification of SC\/STs is contrary to Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575170\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">341<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">For a detailed report of the background, refer to: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/validity-of-sub-classification-among-reserved-categories-supreme-court-7-judge-constitution-bench-begin-hearing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Supreme Court&#8217;s 7-Judge Bench to begin hearing on Validity of Sub-classification among Reserved Categories from January 17th<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Source: Press<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh, Civil Appeal No. 2317\/2011<\/span>]<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of A.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/yM56y26X\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2005) 1 SCC 394<\/a>, the Supreme Court five Judge Bench held that Scheduled Castes form homogenous classes and there cannot be any sub-division, and that such sub-classification of SC\/STs is contrary to Article 341 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":327778,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[43259,49669,71590,71589,5363],"class_list":["post-327773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-e-v-chinnaiah","tag-justice-bela-m-trivedi","tag-punjab-scheduled-caste-and-backward-classes-reservation-in-services-act-2006","tag-sub-classification-of-sc-sts","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sub-classification of SC\/STs is permissible: Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019; SC majority overrules EV Chinnaiah, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019; SC majority overrules EV Chinnaiah, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-01T07:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-01T07:17:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Sub-classification of SC\/STs is permissible: Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-01T07:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-01T07:17:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019; SC majority overrules EV Chinnaiah, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Sub-classification of SCSTs\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sub-classification of SC\/STs is permissible: Supreme Court | SCC Times","description":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019; SC majority overrules EV Chinnaiah, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents","og_description":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019; SC majority overrules EV Chinnaiah, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-01T07:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-01T07:17:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/","name":"Sub-classification of SC\/STs is permissible: Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-01T07:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-01T07:17:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019; SC majority overrules EV Chinnaiah, Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Sub-classification of SCSTs"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/sub-classification-of-sc-sts-permissible-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: SC overrules EV Chinnaiah ruling in 6:1 verdict; Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissents"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":328130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/parliament-power-include-in-exclude-from-scs-list-under-a-341-justice-bela-trivedi-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327773,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Only Parliament can include in or exclude from SCs list under A. 341\u2019: A detailed breakdown of Justice Bela Trivedi\u2019s dissent in Sub-classification of SC\/STs Verdict","author":"Editor","date":"August 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cState has neither executive nor legislative power to sub-classify or sub-divide or re-group the castes, races or tribes specified as the \u201cScheduled Castes\u201d in the Presidential List notified under Article 341. Under the guise of providing reservation or under the pretext of taking affirmative action for the weaker of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sub-classification of SCSTs (2)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sub-classification-of-SCSTs-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/sc-policy-identifying-creamy-layer-in-sc-st-to-exclude-them-from-reservation-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327773,"position":1},"title":"Identify and exclude \u2018creamy layer\u2019 among SC\/ STs from reservation: Supreme Court in Sub-classification of SC\/STs Verdict","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe criteria for exclusion of the creamy layer from the SCs and STs for the purpose of affirmative action could be different from the criteria as applicable to the Other Backward Classes.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"exclude creamy layer SC\/ST","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/02-196.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/02-196.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/02-196.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/02-196.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327856,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/02\/supreme-court-61-verdict-holding-permissibility-of-sub-classification-of-sc-st\/","url_meta":{"origin":327773,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Indra Sawhney did not limit sub-classification to OBCs; Sub-classification of SC\/STs permissible\u2019: A point wise breakdown of Majority Ruling in SC\u2019s 6:1 Verdict","author":"Editor","date":"August 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cArticle 341 does not create an integrated homogenous class. Sub-classification within the Scheduled Castes does not violate Article 341(2) because the castes are not per se included in or excluded from the List.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sub-classification of SCSTs","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sub-classification-of-SCSTs-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sub-classification-of-SCSTs-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sub-classification-of-SCSTs-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sub-classification-of-SCSTs-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311468,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/validity-of-sub-classification-among-reserved-categories-supreme-court-7-judge-constitution-bench-begin-hearing\/","url_meta":{"origin":327773,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court\u2019s 7-Judge Bench to begin hearing on Validity of Sub-classification among Reserved Categories from January 17th","author":"Apoorva","date":"January 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The 5-Judge Bench referred the matter to a 7-Judge Bench, due to immense public importance of the appeal against E.V. Chinnaiah case involving the interpretation of Articles 14, 15, 16, 338, 341, 342, and 342A of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sub-classification among reserved categories","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/sub-classification-among-reserved-categories.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/sub-classification-among-reserved-categories.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/sub-classification-among-reserved-categories.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/sub-classification-among-reserved-categories.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331419,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/decoding-sub-classification-in-scs\/","url_meta":{"origin":327773,"position":4},"title":"Decoding Sub-Classification in SCs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by G.B. Reddy* and Pavan Kasturi**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Decoding Sub-Classification in SCs","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Decoding-Sub-Classification-in-SCs.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Decoding-Sub-Classification-in-SCs.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Decoding-Sub-Classification-in-SCs.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Decoding-Sub-Classification-in-SCs.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/27\/sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-5-judge-bench-calls-for-revision-of-e-v-chinnaiah-decision-matter-referred-to-larger-bench-detailed-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":327773,"position":5},"title":"Sub-classification of Scheduled Castes| 5-judge bench calls for revision of E.V. Chinnaiah decision; Matter referred to larger bench [DETAILED REPORT]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe aspiration of equal treatment of the lowest strata, to whom the fruits of the reservation have not effectively reached, remains a dream. At the same time, various castes by and large remain where they were, and they remain unequals, are they destined to carry their backwardness till eternity?\u201d Supreme\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327773\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/327778"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}