{"id":327749,"date":"2024-08-01T09:00:36","date_gmt":"2024-08-01T03:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327749"},"modified":"2024-08-06T10:29:01","modified_gmt":"2024-08-06T04:59:01","slug":"calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a criminal revisional application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519692\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">401<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Section 528 read with Section read with Section 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) filed by the accused (petitioner) in a case dated 15-09-2018 under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561669\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354A<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a><a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Sections 75\/351(2),351(3)\/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) which was pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore, South 24 Parganas, a Single Judge Bench of Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. held that the allegation of an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561669\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was not applicable against the petitioner since the sub-sections of the said provision specifically begin with the words &#8216;a man&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 15-09-2018, respondent 2 approached the Officer-in-Charge of Netaji Nagar Police Station to lodge a written complaint against four persons alleging that the petitioner along with the principal accused had tried to torture the mother of respondent 2.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was alleged that the principal accused came to respondent 2&#8217;s house and entered her room while she was changing her dress and at that time the principal accused tried to molest her with ill motive. However, respondent 2 rescued herself. The said co-accused was the biological father of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Another allegation made against the petitioner was that the petitioner along with others always instigated and tortured respondent 2&#8217;s mother but no particulars of the alleged offences were given.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was the case of the petitioner that a charge sheet was filed against four accused persons including her without proper investigation even though she was innocent and had no role to play in the alleged offences. It was also contended that the entire proceeding against the petitioner was an abuse of the process of law which required immediate interference by the Court under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was also contended that the charge sheet filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561669\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was incongruous because this provision does not apply against a female accused since the Section opens with the term &#8216;a man&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that a perusal of the statement of respondent 2 recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">164<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a><a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a> revealed that allegations were made only against the principal accused and not a single allegation was levelled against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court perused the statement of the mother of respondent 2 under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519397\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">161<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a><a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. Section 180 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a> and that all the accused persons had threatened her with dire consequences but no particular date, time, or place had been disclosed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that, from the entire evidence collected during the investigation, it could find no specific role of the petitioner regarding the allegations made by respondent 2.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that all the allegations made against the petitioner were merely for implication with an ulterior motive for vengeance, and to spite the petitioner due to private and personal grudge towards her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that under such circumstances, inherent power under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> could be exercised to prevent the abuse of the process of law and to secure the ends of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhajan Lal<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/PrBF91ZF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1992 Supp (1) SCC 335<\/a> and said that it was squarely applicable to the present case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that a bare perusal of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561669\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> would reveal that this Section could apply only to a male accused. The Court said that all sub-sections of Section 354A begin with the words &#8216;a man&#8217;, and hence, a woman could not be said to have committed an offence under this provision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tolaram Relumal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Bombay<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4EKO38j3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1954) 1 SCC 961<\/a> wherein it was held that if two possible and reasonable constructions could be put upon a penal provision, the Court must lean towards the construction which exempts the subject from penalty rather than the one which imposes penalty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it could be safely accepted that a female could not be an accused under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561669\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> as was evident from the terminology used in the said enactment. Further, the Court said that the offence under the said Section was gender specific and only a male could be prosecuted under this offence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the allegation of an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561669\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was not applicable against the present petitioner and quashed the proceedings in connection with the case dated 15-09-2018 against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Susmita Pandit v. State of West Bengal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KXYorXac\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 7116<\/a>, Decided on 26-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner &#8212;<\/span> Advocate Ayan Bhattacharjee, Advocate Amitabrata Hait, Advocate Arpit Choudhury<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent &#8212;<\/span> Advocate Madhusudan Sur, Advocate Dipankar Paramanick<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Section 528 read with Section read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804175\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">442<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803764\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">75<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803713\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">351(2)<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803713\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">351(3)<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803655\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(5)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803887\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">183<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803884\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">180<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">It was said that since all sub-sections of Section 354A of IPC start with the words &#8216;a man&#8217;, a female accused would not be covered under this Section.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,55076,71579,13961,61464,71578,2850],"class_list":["post-327749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-female-accused","tag-gender-specific-section","tag-ipc","tag-justice-ajay-kumar-gupta","tag-sec-354a","tag-sexual_harassment"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-01T03:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-06T04:59:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-01T03:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-06T04:59:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused","og_description":"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-01T03:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-06T04:59:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/","name":"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-08-01T03:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-06T04:59:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused and says offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/calcutta-hc-quashes-sexual-harassment-case-against-female-accused-says-offence-under-354a-ipc-gender-specific\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Offence under S. 354A of IPC is gender specific and only a man can be prosecuted under the same\u2019; Calcutta HC quashes sexual harassment case against female accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/false-invocation-of-ss-354a-506-ipc-merely-trivalises-offence-of-sexual-harassment-casting-doubt-on-veracity-of-allegations\/","url_meta":{"origin":327749,"position":0},"title":"False invocation of Ss. 354A, 506 IPC merely trivalises offence of sexual harassment casting doubt on veracity of allegations by victim who has in reality faced sexual harassment: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., expressed its anguish at how provisions such as Sections 354A\/506 of Penal Code, 1860 are falsely invoked at the drop of a hat to register one\u2019s displeasure at the conduct of another individual. Instant petition was filed under Article 226\/227 of the Constitution of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/17\/unexplained-delay-in-filing-fir-accuseds-old-age-and-physical-disability-victims-sexually-provocative-dress-inter-alia-lead-to-kerala-court-granting-bail-to-malayali-writer-civic-chandran\/","url_meta":{"origin":327749,"position":1},"title":"Unexplained delay in filing FIR; Accused&#8217;s old age and physical disability; Victim&#8217;s &#8220;sexually provocative&#8221; dress, inter alia, lead to Kerala Court granting bail to Malayali writer Civic Chandran","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Court of Sessions, Kozhikode: In an interesting case, S. Krishna Kumar, Sessions Judge granted bail to 74 years old Malayali activist and writer Civic Chandran in a sexual assault case. While releasing the accused on bail, the Court remarked, \u201cThe defacto complainant herself was dressed in sexually exposing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sexually provocative","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/16-30_MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/16-30_MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/16-30_MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/16-30_MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/16-30_MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/13\/madras-hc-quashes-case-354a-teenage-love-affair\/","url_meta":{"origin":327749,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Hugging or kissing between teenagers in love is natural\u2019, Madras HC quashes case against 21-year-old boy accused of sexual harassment","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court clarified that to constitute an offence under Section 354-A(1)(i) of IPC, the accused must make unwelcome physical contact and advances, specifically involving explicit sexual overtures.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/18\/delhi-court-grants-interim-bail-to-brij-bhushan-in-sexual-harassment-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327749,"position":3},"title":"Delhi Court grants two-days interim bail to Brij Bhushan in a sexual harassment case","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBJP MP and former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh has been granted interim bail by Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court in the case of alleged sexual harassment of six female wrestlers. His secretary Vinod Tomar is also granted bail by the Delhi Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rouse avenue court, delhi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/proceedings-ulterior-motive-wreaking-personal-vengeance-court-attending-circumstances-due-care-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":327749,"position":4},"title":"Courts must look into attending circumstances with due care in cases based on ulterior motive for wreaking personal vengeance: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court noted that there are multiple FIRs that have been registered over a period, thereby attracting the issue of wreaking vengeance out of private or personal grudge as alleged.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"attending circumstances","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232320,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/16\/bom-hc-step-father-accused-of-sexually-abusing-step-daughter-granted-bail-since-investigation-in-case-complete\/","url_meta":{"origin":327749,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Step father accused of sexually abusing step daughter granted bail since investigation in case complete","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay\u00a0High Court:\u00a0Sandeep K. Shinde, J., granted bail to the applicant accused of sexually abusing her step daughter. Applicant sought enlargement on bail in the case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 354A of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 8, 9(n) of the Protection of Children from Sexual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327749"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327749\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}