{"id":327542,"date":"2024-07-29T18:30:05","date_gmt":"2024-07-29T13:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327542"},"modified":"2024-08-06T09:50:05","modified_gmt":"2024-08-06T04:20:05","slug":"bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Telangana High Court:<\/span> A petition was filed under Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> raising a question that whether petitioner which was registered under Sales Tax and GST regime in Maharashtra, but could not file its return in the GST portal of that State because of technical glitch and filed it in the GST portal of Telangana, could be saddled with demand, penalty, and interest despite the fact that petitioner’s branch existed in the State of Telangana, especially when credit taken by petitioner was transferred to Maharashtra portal on the same day. Thus, in the present case, the question was about the scope and ambit of Section 140<\/a> of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (‘the CGST Act’).<\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul*<\/span> and Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, JJ., opined that it was the duty of the Department to keep their portal functional and if the portal was not functional or was having technical glitch and because of that, petitioner was compelled to file return in the portal of Telangana, then petitioner could not be saddled with demand, interest, and penalty.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Petitioner’s headquarter was in Mumbai, Maharashtra and the centralized registration of petitioner was also at Maharashtra under the Service Tax and the CGST Act<\/a>. Petitioner was entitled to enjoy the credit of Rs 1,41,26,69,646 and it made efforts to file the Return on the official GST portal of Maharashtra, but because of technical glitch in the Maharashtra portal, his efforts went in vain. Petitioner had a branch in Telangana and accordingly, he filed the Returns in the portal of Telangana, took credit, and transferred it on the same day to the portal of Maharashtra.<\/p>\n

Petitioner was served with a pre-show cause notice, wherein it was alleged that the credit availed by petitioner through TRAN-I return filed by the Telangana registration was ineligible and required to be reversed along with applicable interest and penalty. Petitioner made it clear that total transitional credit of Rs 1,41,26,69,646 was transferred to Maharashtra GST registration on the same day of filing the TRAN-1 and only the differential balance of ITC amounting Rs 2,00,000 was available in the State of Telangana. Thereafter, respondents issued a show-cause notice and petitioner filed his reply to it, but respondents were not satisfied with the reply and thus passed the impugned Order-in-Original dated 31-10-2023, which was challenged in the present petition.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The issue for consideration was “whether in the teeth of Section 140<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a>, was there any bar or prohibition for filing return in the GST portal of Telangana where petitioner’s branch existed?”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The Court took note of the impugned order and stated that it was admitted in the show cause notice itself that petitioner faced problem in filing return electronically because of technical glitch in the GST portal of Maharashtra. Thus, for this reason and considering the last date of filing return, petitioner filed the return in the Telangana GST portal.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that as per Section 140(1)<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a>, a registered person other than a person opting to pay taxes under Section 10 shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger, the amount of CENVAT credit. The Court stated that the registration number\/Permanent Account Number (‘PAN’) of petitioner was same nationwide and thus, Section 140(1) did not permit respondents to arrive at a conclusion that petitioner was obliged to file return electronically only in the GST portal of Maharashtra.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that the Revenue could not establish that there existed any prohibition\/bar in filing the return through electronic mode in GST portal of Telangana where petitioner’s branch existed. Further, it was also not established that petitioner derived any undue benefit by filing a return in the GST portal of Telangana and transferring the credit on the same day and the Revenue suffered any loss because of petitioner’s action.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that it was the duty of the Department to keep their portal functional and if the portal was not functional or was having technical glitch and because of that petitioner was compelled to file return in the portal of Telangana, then petitioner could not be saddled with demand, interest, and penalty. The Court relied on Devendra Kumar<\/span> v. State of Uttaranchal<\/span>, (2013) 9 SCC 363<\/a> and opined that the Department could not take benefit of its own wrong.<\/p>\n

The Court thus held that the foundation of show cause notice itself was bad in law and the assumption that return could not have been filed in the GST portal of Telangana did not flow from Section 140<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a>. Therefore, the Court stated that the impugned action founded upon such notion was bad in law and deserved interference. The Court allowed the writ petition by setting aside the show cause notice and Order-in-Original.<\/p>\n

[Standard Chartered Bank v. Commr. (GST), 2024 SCC OnLine TS 1650<\/a>, decided on 11-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice Sujoy Paul<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Lakshmi Kumaran Sridharan, Counsel<\/p>\n

For the Respondents:<\/span> B. Narayan Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Uday Kumar Bhagwath<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The foundation of show cause notice itself was bad in law and the assumption that return could not have been filed in the GST portal of Telangana did not flow from Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":315575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3090,71499,30592,6241,50104,40184,2591,71501,71500,2627,71498,3543,31285,33941],"class_list":["post-327542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bank","tag-central-goods-and-services-tax-2017","tag-demand","tag-gst","tag-gst-portal","tag-gst-return","tag-Interest","tag-justice-namavarapu-rajeshwar-rao","tag-justice-sujoy-paul","tag-Penalty","tag-section-140","tag-Standard_Chartered_Bank","tag-technical-glitch","tag-telangana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana High Court held that the Bank could not be charged with demand, interest, and penalty for filing return in Telangana\u2019s GST portal instead of Maharashtra's, due to technical glitch.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telangana High Court held that the Bank could not be charged with demand, interest, and penalty for filing return in Telangana\u2019s GST portal instead of Maharashtra's, due to technical glitch.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-29T13:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-06T04:20:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/\",\"name\":\"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-29T13:00:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-06T04:20:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Telangana High Court held that the Bank could not be charged with demand, interest, and penalty for filing return in Telangana\u2019s GST portal instead of Maharashtra's, due to technical glitch.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Telangana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana HC | SCC Times","description":"Telangana High Court held that the Bank could not be charged with demand, interest, and penalty for filing return in Telangana\u2019s GST portal instead of Maharashtra's, due to technical glitch.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana High Court","og_description":"Telangana High Court held that the Bank could not be charged with demand, interest, and penalty for filing return in Telangana\u2019s GST portal instead of Maharashtra's, due to technical glitch.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-29T13:00:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-06T04:20:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/","name":"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-29T13:00:05+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-06T04:20:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Telangana High Court held that the Bank could not be charged with demand, interest, and penalty for filing return in Telangana\u2019s GST portal instead of Maharashtra's, due to technical glitch.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Telangana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":272789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/01\/telangana-state-authority-advanceruling-cgst-investigation-post-filing-application-not-debar-seekingadvanceruling-telanganahighcourt-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327542,"position":0},"title":"Whether investigation post filing of an application for advance ruling would debar the applicant from seeking advance ruling? Telangana High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Telangana High Court: While allowing the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the impugned order dated 03-06-2022 passed by Telangana State Authority for Advance Ruling (\u2018Authority') and to consider the application for advance ruling under Section 98 of the Central Goods\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/telangana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/ker-hc-gst-no-encashment-of-bank-guarantee-in-a-tax-evasion-case-until-the-statutory-appeal-in-that-regard-is-considered-by-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":327542,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | GST: No encashment of bank guarantee in a tax evasion case until the statutory appeal in that regard is considered by Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of Dama Seshadri Naidu, J. granted a stay on encashment of bank guarantee by tax authorities until the statutory appeal preferred in that regard was considered by the competent court. Petitioner herein was transporting certain goods from Tamil Nadu to Perinthalmanna. When the authorities checked\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":199591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/03\/gst-portal-nodal-officer-to-facilitate-in-uploading-gst-form-for-claiming-input-tax-credit-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":327542,"position":2},"title":"GST Portal | Nodal officer to facilitate in uploading GST Form for claiming Input Tax Credit: Kerala High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dama Seshadri Naidu J., decided a writ petition wherein it directed the respondent nodal officer, GST department to facilitate the petitioner in uploading FORM GST TRAN 1 for claiming Input Tax Credit. In the present case, petitioner a dealer registered under Kerala\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":282720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":327542,"position":3},"title":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner","author":"Editor","date":"January 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view that neither the notice served upon the petitioner mentioned any specific defect found by the authorities nor the order of tax and demand specify any reason why the documents accompanying the goods were found to be defective.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":269837,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/08\/orissa-high-court-submission-of-certified-order-copy-with-appeal-memo-only-a-procedural-requirement-merit-of-the-matter-in-appeal-not-to-be-sacrificed\/","url_meta":{"origin":327542,"position":4},"title":"Orissa High Court| Submission of certified order copy with appeal memo only a procedural requirement; Merit of the matter in appeal not to be sacrificed","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Krushna Ram Mohapatra and Murahari Sri Raman, JJ. in a case where due to pandemic certified copy was not available on time while filing appeal , enclosure of impugned order copy available on GST portal as opposed to procedural requirement of certified copy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/19\/del-hc-authorities-directed-to-allow-late-filing-of-gst-tran-1-form-to-a-dealer-who-missed-the-same-due-to-maze-of-compliance-due-dates\/","url_meta":{"origin":327542,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Authorities directed to allow late filing of GST TRAN-1 Form to a dealer who missed the same due to maze of compliance due dates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar and Talwant Singh, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed by a car dealer who sought directions authorities to allow them to filed GST TRAN-1 Form beyond the due date. The petitioner was registered under Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. They prayed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327542\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}