{"id":327442,"date":"2024-07-27T12:00:51","date_gmt":"2024-07-27T06:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327442"},"modified":"2024-07-27T12:40:12","modified_gmt":"2024-07-27T07:10:12","slug":"lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young due to forum non conveniens"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court of the State of New York:<\/span> While considering a lawsuit filed in 2021 against multiple defendants including Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young, by Neopahrma founder Dr Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, the single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Joel M. Kohen, JSC<\/span>, dismissed the suit on the grounds of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">forum non conveniens<\/span> and lack of personal jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court on 10-7-2024 dismissed the plantiffs&#8217; Amended Complaint without prejudice due to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">forum non conveniens<\/span>, conditioned upon the defendants accepting service of process (analogues local procedure) in their home jurisdictions, in the event the plaintiffs reassert their claims in such jurisdictions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dr Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty v. Bank of Baroda, Index. No. 654399\/2021, decided on 10-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Order by Joel M. Kohen, JSC<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":327452,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[33133,71453,71452,56591,71450,71451,71454],"class_list":["post-327442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-bank-of-baroda","tag-dr-bavaguthu-raghuram-shetty","tag-e-and-y","tag-ernst-and-young","tag-neopharma","tag-nmc-health","tag-supreme-court-of-new-york"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NY SC dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against BOB and Ernst &amp; Young<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young due to forum non conveniens\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-27T06:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-27T07:10:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tmp_38015f39-d6aa-4c37-87a4-f344899f4a74.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young due to forum non conveniens\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"NY SC dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against BOB and Ernst & Young\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-27T06:30:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-27T07:10:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Neopharma lawsuit Bank of Baroda Ernst & Young\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young due to forum non conveniens\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NY SC dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against BOB and Ernst & Young","description":"The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst & Young due to forum non conveniens","og_description":"The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-27T06:30:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-27T07:10:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tmp_38015f39-d6aa-4c37-87a4-f344899f4a74.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young due to forum non conveniens","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/","name":"NY SC dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against BOB and Ernst & Young","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-27T06:30:51+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-27T07:10:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"The single Judge Bench of Joel M. Kohen, JSC, dismissed the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of personal jurisdiction.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Neopharma lawsuit Bank of Baroda Ernst & Young"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/27\/lawsuit-neopharma-ernst-and-young-bank-of-baroda-sc-new-york-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NY Supreme Court dismisses Neopharma lawsuit against Bank of Baroda and Ernst &amp; Young due to forum non conveniens"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/blog-sc-2.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/whether-a-petition-can-be-entertain-applying-principle-of-forum-conveniens-jharkhand-high-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":327442,"position":0},"title":"Whether a petition can be entertain applying principle of Forum Conveniens? Jharkhand High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J., while dismissing the present writ petition primarily for want of territorial jurisdiction held that even if a small part of cause of action is said to have arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, it would not be proper to entertain the petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276417,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/whether-a-petition-can-be-entertain-applying-principle-of-forum-conveniens-jharkhand-high-court-answers-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":327442,"position":1},"title":"Whether a petition can be entertained applying principle of Forum Conveniens? Jharkhand High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J., while dismissing the present writ petition primarily for want of territorial jurisdiction held that even if a small part of cause of action is said to have arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, it would not be proper to entertain the petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/del-hc-cancellation-of-upsc-interviews-is-not-to-be-viewed-solitarily-as-a-one-off-incident-represents-a-deeper-malaise-in-selection-read-verdict-on-cancellation-of-upsc-interviews\/","url_meta":{"origin":327442,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Cancellation of UPSC interviews is not to be viewed solitarily as a one-off incident, represents a deeper malaise in selection: Read Verdict on cancellation of UPSC interviews","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Prathiba M. Singh, J., while addressing the grievance of UPSC aspirants in regard to cancellation of interviews to be held by the Selection Committee observed that, Selection to the civil services, especially the IAS \u2013 a coveted service, cannot be a whimsical process. It has to follow certain\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":171724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/30\/tdsat-petition-rejected-ground-forum-non-conveniens\/","url_meta":{"origin":327442,"position":3},"title":"TDSAT: Petition rejected on ground of forum non-conveniens","author":"Saba","date":"November 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal: In the order passed by S.K. Singh, Chairperson (TDSAT), on the ground of jurisdiction (forum non-conveniens), the Tribunal asked the petitioner to exercise its remedy before the appropriate forum. The objection to the dismissed petition was raised by the respondent on the ground that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/29\/case-comment-on-four-seasons-holdings-inc-v-brownlie-a-uk-supreme-court-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":327442,"position":4},"title":"Case Comment on Four Seasons Holdings Inc. v. Brownlie  \u2014 A UK Supreme Court Decision","author":"Editor","date":"January 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tanvi Nigam*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/madhya-pradesh-hc-denies-relief-to-extol-industries-against-bank-of-baroda\/","url_meta":{"origin":327442,"position":5},"title":"IBC is a complete code with inbuilt remedies; MP HC denies relief to personal guarantors of Extol Industries in \u20b924.83 Crore Bank of Baroda dispute","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that despite filing an appeal before the NCLAT, the petitioners filed the present writ petition challenging the demand notice issued by the Bank.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"relief to Extol Industries against Bank of Baroda","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/relief-to-Extol-Industries-against-Bank-of-Baroda.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/relief-to-Extol-Industries-against-Bank-of-Baroda.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/relief-to-Extol-Industries-against-Bank-of-Baroda.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/relief-to-Extol-Industries-against-Bank-of-Baroda.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327442\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/327452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}