{"id":327401,"date":"2024-07-26T14:00:49","date_gmt":"2024-07-26T08:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327401"},"modified":"2024-07-30T11:50:12","modified_gmt":"2024-07-30T06:20:12","slug":"trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tripura High Court:<\/span> In the present case, a second appeal was filed under Section 100<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’), challenging the judgment and order dated 27-07-2023 delivered by Additional District Judge, Khowai, Tripura. A Single Judge Bench of Biswajit Palit, J.<\/span>, held that the appeal filed by appellant under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a> was not maintainable and the same was liable to be dismissed as there was no material in the present case to formulate any substantial question of law.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Appellant had earlier filed a petition under Order XXI, Rule 97<\/a>–101<\/a> of CPC<\/a> before the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Khowai in connection with a case which arose out of a suit filed by Respondent 7 (decree holder in original plaint) claiming adverse possession over the suit land on the ground that appellant was not made party in the suit filed by Respondent 13 (judgment debtor in original plaint). But the Court below did not consider the evidence on record of appellant and dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, appellant filed an appeal before the Court of District Judge under Order XXI, Rule 103<\/a> of CPC<\/a>, Khowai, which was later transferred to the Court of Additional District Judge, Khowai. The First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal affirming the judgment and order of Civil Judge, Senior Division with modification of exonerating the payment of cost of Rs 20,000 on the ground that the appeal was a statutory right of appellant. Appellant had preferred this appeal on the ground that both the Courts below did not consider the long-standing possession of appellant nor they appreciated the evidence on record and thus, urged for allowing the present appeal by setting aside the judgment of the First Appellate Court and to pass an order for restoration of possession of the suit land, i.e., decreetal land, to her.<\/p>\n

Counsel for respondents submitted that the present appeal was not maintainable as under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a>, no decree was passed by the First Appellate Court, so, the present appeal was barred by law.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The issues for consideration before the Court were:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the appeal filed by appellant was maintainable under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a>?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether there was any substantial question of law to be formulated in the present appeal?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Court, to decide whether the order passed under Order XXI, Rule 103<\/a> of CPC<\/a> was a decree or not, relied on Asgar<\/span> v. Mohan Varma<\/span>, (2020) 16 SCC 230<\/a>; and Sameer Singh<\/span> v. Abdul Rab<\/span>, (2015) 1 SCC 379<\/a>, and opined that the order passed under Order XXI, Rule 103 be treated as a decree which was subjected to an appeal. The Court also opined that there was scope for preferring appeal under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a>, if there was material to raise substantial question of law.<\/p>\n

    Thus, the Court stated that the contention that the present appeal was not maintainable under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a> was not correct and could not be accepted, rather the appeal filed by appellant was maintainable under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a> before the Court as the order of Additional District Judge was a decree.<\/p>\n

    The Court relied on Nazir Mohamed<\/span> v. J. Kamala<\/span>, (2020) 19 SCC 57<\/a> (‘Nazir Mohamed Case’); and M. Radheshyamlal<\/span> v. V. Sandhya<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 318<\/a>, and stated that appellant had totally failed to establish her right of adverse possession of the decreetal land. Thus, both the Court below, i..e, the Executing Court and the First Appellate Court rightly turned down appellant’s claim in respect of the suit land. Further, in the application filed by appellant before the Executing Court, the quantum of land was shown as 14 ½ gandas in the schedule but factually it should be 0.030 acres and there was no explanation in this regard from appellant’s side.<\/p>\n

    The Court stated that in view of Nazir Mohamed Case (supra), there was no material in the present case to formulate any substantial question of law. Thus, the Court held that the appeal filed by appellant under Section 100<\/a> of CPC<\/a> was not maintainable and the same was liable to be dismissed. The Court further affirmed the judgment\/order delivered by the Additional District Judge.<\/p>\n

    [Haridasi Paul v. Uma Deb, 2024 SCC OnLine Tri 473<\/a>, decided on 22-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For the Appellant:<\/span> D. Deb, D. Debnath, Advocates<\/p>\n

    For the Respondents:<\/span> Sankar Deb, Senior Advocate; R. Dasgupta, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    ‘The contention that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 100 of CPC cannot be accepted, rather the appeal filed by appellant is maintainable before the Court as the order of Additional District Judge is a decree.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314902,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36995,8991,39496,2713,9821,71436,39285,71435,25654,2586],"class_list":["post-327401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adverse-possession","tag-appeal","tag-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-decree","tag-maintainability","tag-material-to-formulate","tag-restoration-of-possession","tag-section-100","tag-substantial-question-of-law","tag-Tripura_High_Court"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tripura High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as there was no material to formulate any substantial question of law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as there was no material to formulate any substantial question of law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-26T08:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-30T06:20:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-26T08:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-30T06:20:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Tripura High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as there was no material to formulate any substantial question of law.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Tripura High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC | SCC Times","description":"Tripura High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as there was no material to formulate any substantial question of law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC","og_description":"Tripura High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as there was no material to formulate any substantial question of law.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-26T08:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-30T06:20:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","name":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-26T08:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-30T06:20:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Tripura High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as there was no material to formulate any substantial question of law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Tripura High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271912,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/it-is-not-for-the-court-to-decide-the-validity-of-the-allotment-of-land-by-the-government-tripura-high-court-dismisses-appeal-in-suit-for-recovery-of-possession-of-land\/","url_meta":{"origin":327401,"position":0},"title":"“It is not for the court to decide the validity of the allotment of land by the Government”; Tripura High Court dismisses appeal in suit for recovery of possession of land","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: T. Amarnath Goud, J. dismissed a second appeal which was filed under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the judgment which dismissed the appeal affirming the judgment passed by Civil Judge ( Senior Division) in connection with declaring the right, title & interest of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239335,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/19\/high-court-not-obliged-to-frame-substantial-question-of-law-if-no-error-is-found-in-first-appellate-courts-findings-says-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":327401,"position":1},"title":"High Court not obliged to frame substantial question of law if no error is found in First Appellate Court’s findings; says SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that the High Court is not obliged to frame substantial question of law, in case, it finds no error in the findings recorded by the First Appellate Court. The Court was hearing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":172664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/01\/exists-substantial-question-law-miscellaneous-appeal-can-entertained\/","url_meta":{"origin":327401,"position":2},"title":"If there exists substantial question of law, miscellaneous appeal can be entertained","author":"Saba","date":"December 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur: The Court recently heard an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order of 2010 in a suit filed by plaintiffs for declaration, possession and permanent injunction which was dismissed by the trial court in 2009\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/","url_meta":{"origin":327401,"position":3},"title":"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Biswajit Mohanty, J. dismissed the revision petition being not maintainable. The facts of the case are such that the petitioners 1 to 8 filed a civil suit valued at Rs 49,000\/- in the Court of Civil Judge Dharamgarh for declaration of their right title and interest and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/appeal-cannot-be-transferred-to-commercial-court-u-s-245-of-cpc-term-proceeding-does-not-include-appeals-ap-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":327401,"position":4},"title":"Appeal cannot be transferred to Commercial Court u\/s 24(5) of CPC; term \u2018proceeding\u2019 under the provision does not include appeals: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This will not mean that the appellant cannot prefer a fresh appeal to the commercial court, Visakhapatnam or such Court which has the jurisdiction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/ieee-mumbai-section-welfare-assn-v-global-ieee-institute-for-engineers-an-immediate-re-look-necessary-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":327401,"position":5},"title":"IEEE Mumbai Section Welfare Assn. v. Global IEEE Institute for Engineers: An Immediate Re-Look Necessary by the Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Basanti Lal Pavecha* and Avish Mittal**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327401\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314902"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}