{"id":327345,"date":"2024-07-25T15:30:12","date_gmt":"2024-07-25T10:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327345"},"modified":"2024-07-30T11:27:25","modified_gmt":"2024-07-30T05:57:25","slug":"mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition challenging the actions of the respondent State concerning the operation of select lists for Unreserved and OBC categories where the Court issued certain directions regarding disclosure of merit rankings and appointment details, a division bench comprising of Raj Mohan Singh and Devnarayan Mishra, JJ., granted an extension for compliance with the initial order, subject to the payment of costs of Rs. 50,000 to be deposited with the M.P. High Court Legal Service Authority, Jabalpur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioners filed a petition challenging the actions of the respondent State concerning the operation of select lists for Unreserved and OBC categories. On 04.04.2024, the Court issued a notice to the respondents with specific directions to file a reply within seven working days upon payment of Process Fee and stated that the non-compliance of the same would result in the dismissal of the petition. The State was directed to file a parawise reply disclosing, names and merit rankings of individuals in the unoperated select lists for Unreserved and OBC categories (each comprising 13% of advertised vacancies), merit ranking of the petitioners and whether any candidate with a lower merit ranking than the petitioners has been appointed to fill 87% of the vacancies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the State did not comply with the directions issued on 04.04.2024. The Court noted that the petitioners&#8217; counsel emphasised on the urgency of the matter and pressed for further directions. While expressing dissatisfaction with the State&#8217;s non-compliance, the Court granted a final opportunity to the respondent\/State to comply, subject to a cost of Rs. 50,000\/- to be deposited in the M.P. High Court Legal Service Authority, Jabalpur, by the next hearing date, 31-07-2024. The Court also directed that the State may recover the cost amount from the responsible officer who failed to comply with the order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pragya Sharma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GYuUzAt2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 4915<\/a>, Decided on 16-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Anshuman Singh, Counsel for the Petitioners;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Darshan Soni, Govt. Advocate, Counsel for the Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court stated that the State may recover the amount of cost after fixing the &#8220;responsibility on some erring officer who has derelicted in not complying with the order in time&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[17801,46138,71391,69591,71395,7201,71393,71392,35648,71394,43506],"class_list":["post-327345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-costs","tag-imposition-of-cost","tag-justice-devnarayan-mishra","tag-justice-raj-mohan-singh","tag-legal-accountability","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-merit-ranking","tag-non-compliance-of-court-order","tag-obc-category","tag-select-lists","tag-unreserved-category"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 and imposes Rs. 50,000 cost for non-compliance of court order\u2019s | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court slammed the State&#039;s &#039;pathetic attitude&#039; towards non-compliance and imposed Rs. 50,000 Cost for non-compliance of court order.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court slammed the State&#039;s &#039;pathetic attitude&#039; towards non-compliance and imposed Rs. 50,000 Cost for non-compliance of court order.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-25T10:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-30T05:57:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 and imposes Rs. 50,000 cost for non-compliance of court order\u2019s | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-25T10:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-30T05:57:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court slammed the State's 'pathetic attitude' towards non-compliance and imposed Rs. 50,000 Cost for non-compliance of court order.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 and imposes Rs. 50,000 cost for non-compliance of court order\u2019s | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court slammed the State's 'pathetic attitude' towards non-compliance and imposed Rs. 50,000 Cost for non-compliance of court order.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost","og_description":"MP High Court slammed the State's 'pathetic attitude' towards non-compliance and imposed Rs. 50,000 Cost for non-compliance of court order.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-25T10:00:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-30T05:57:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/","name":"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 and imposes Rs. 50,000 cost for non-compliance of court order\u2019s | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-25T10:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-30T05:57:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court slammed the State's 'pathetic attitude' towards non-compliance and imposed Rs. 50,000 Cost for non-compliance of court order.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/mp-hc-slams-states-pathetic-attitude-and-imposes-rs-50000-cost-for-non-compliance-of-court-orders-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP High Court slams State\u2019s \u2018pathetic attitude\u2019 towards non-compliance of court order; grants extension and imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":347347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/08\/mp-hc-quashes-improper-implementation-of-reservation-rules-in-selection-process-directs-reconsideration-of-obc-female-candidates-candidature-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327345,"position":0},"title":"MP High Court quashes improper implementation of Reservation Rules in Selection Process; directs reconsideration of OBC female candidate\u2019s candidature","author":"Ritu","date":"May 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court is inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondents No.2\/3 to follow the proper procedure as prescribed under Rule 11.2 and 11.3 of the Rules of 2013.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319857,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/10\/challenge-to-mppscs-8713-percent-formula-madhya-pradesh-high-court-issues-notice-seeking-reply-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327345,"position":1},"title":"Challenge to MPPSC\u2019s 87:13 percent formula: Madhya Pradesh High Court issues notice","author":"Ritu","date":"April 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The MPPSC adopted a two-list formula, 87:13 percent formula, to divide the whole advertisement into two parts to declare result, i.e., holding back the results of 13% of both general and OBC category candidates for appointment and declaring result of 87%.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/16\/civil-services-sc-st-or-obc-candidate-selected-against-unreserved-vacancy-as-a-general-merit-candidate-cannot-make-a-grievance-for-allocation-of-cadre-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":327345,"position":2},"title":"[Civil Services] SC\/ST or OBC candidate selected against unreserved vacancy as a general merit candidate cannot make a grievance for allocation of cadre: SC","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe State has no discretion of allocation of a cadre at its whims and fancies.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/29\/general-category-obc-candidates-merit-reservation-horizontal-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":327345,"position":3},"title":"Insertion of meritorious OBC candidates into general category list without disturbing the appointment of general category candidates? Supreme Court strikes balance\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a service matter where upon reshuffling and on insertion of two OBC candidates into general category select list, two general category candidates already appointed and working since long would have been expelled or removed, thereby unsettling the entire selection process, the bench of MR Shah* and BV\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Insertion-of-meritorious-OBC-candidates-into-general-category-list-without-disturbing-the-appointment-of-general-category-candidates-Supreme-Court-strikes-balance.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Insertion-of-meritorious-OBC-candidates-into-general-category-list-without-disturbing-the-appointment-of-general-category-candidates-Supreme-Court-strikes-balance.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Insertion-of-meritorious-OBC-candidates-into-general-category-list-without-disturbing-the-appointment-of-general-category-candidates-Supreme-Court-strikes-balance.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Insertion-of-meritorious-OBC-candidates-into-general-category-list-without-disturbing-the-appointment-of-general-category-candidates-Supreme-Court-strikes-balance.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Insertion-of-meritorious-OBC-candidates-into-general-category-list-without-disturbing-the-appointment-of-general-category-candidates-Supreme-Court-strikes-balance.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/22\/compartmentalised-horizontal-reservation-sc-holds-restriction-on-meritorious-reserved-category-candidates-migration-to-unreserved-seats-unsustainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":327345,"position":4},"title":"Compartmentalised Horizontal Reservation: SC holds restriction on meritorious reserved category candidates\u2019 migration to unreserved seats unsustainable","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe appellants were deprived of their legitimate claim of admission against the UR-GS category due to an erroneous application of the methodology in applying the horizontal and vertical reservation\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"horizontal reservation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/horizontal-reservation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/horizontal-reservation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/horizontal-reservation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/horizontal-reservation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335830,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/mp-hc-extends-migration-benefits-to-meritorious-reserved-judicial-services-recruitment-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327345,"position":5},"title":"MP High Court extends migration benefits to meritorious reserved category candidates at all stages of MP Judicial Services recruitment","author":"Ritu","date":"November 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court added that this directive does not affect ongoing recruitment where examinations have already been conducted.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327345\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}