{"id":327253,"date":"2024-07-24T18:30:10","date_gmt":"2024-07-24T13:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327253"},"modified":"2024-08-02T09:49:40","modified_gmt":"2024-08-02T04:19:40","slug":"telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In an application filed under Section 482<\/a>1<\/sup> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) seeking to recall the order dated 30-05-2024 on the grounds that the court had overlooked a telephonic conversation that was submitted along with the original application, a single-judge bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., emphasised the limitations imposed by Section 362<\/a>2<\/sup> of CrPC<\/a> and upheld the original order. The Court held that “the document on which applicant wants to place reliance is not a public document and a private document cannot be considered unless and until it is proved in accordance with law” and dismissed the application on the grounds that no interference was warranted.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to State of Orissa<\/span> v. Debendranath Pandhi<\/span>, (2005) 1 SCC 568<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that an accused has no right to file a document in his defense at the stage of framing of charges. The Court noted that the document in question, i.e., telephonic conversation, is a private document not a public one, and therefore, cannot be considered unless proved according to the law.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that under Section 362<\/a> of CrPC<\/a>, the court is barred from altering or reviewing its own judgment or order once signed, except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The Court stated that if the applicant believes the order is erroneous, the proper remedy is to appeal to a higher forum as the Court is restricted by Section 362<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> from altering or reviewing its own orders on merits.<\/p>\n

The Court considered the argument advanced and concluded that the present application lacks merit. The Court held that no case was made out for interference and dismissed the application.<\/p>\n

[Amit Khampariya<\/span> v. State of M.P.<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine MP 4913<\/a>, Decided on -05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Shri Vikas Mishra, Counsel for the Applicant<\/p>\n

Shri Dilip Parihar, Counsel for the State<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

1.<\/a> Section 528<\/a> of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a>.<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Section 403<\/a> of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court reiterated that the court cannot open its own order on merits specifically in the light of the bar as contained under Section 362 of CrPC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,71357,61228,7201,71354,71356,71355,71353],"class_list":["post-327253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-courts-power-to-recall-order","tag-justice-g-s-ahluwalia","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-private-document","tag-section-362-crpc","tag-stage-of-framing-charges","tag-telephonic-conversation"],"yoast_head":"\nTelephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court held that the telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court held that the telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-24T13:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-02T04:19:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-24T13:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-02T04:19:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court held that the telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court held that the telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court held that the telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-24T13:00:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-02T04:19:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-24T13:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-02T04:19:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court held that the telephonic conversation, a private document, cannot be considered at stage of framing charges.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/telephonic-conversation-a-private-document-cannot-be-considered-at-stage-of-framing-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Private documents like telephonic conversation cannot be considered at stage of framing charges: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/woman-living-with-man-for-considerably-long-period-of-time-as-husband-and-wife-is-entitled-to-maintenance-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327253,"position":0},"title":"Woman living with man for considerably long period of time entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that Supreme Court has emphasised on the broad interpretation of the term \u201cwife\u201d under Section 125 of CrPC and the presumption of marriage in cases of long cohabitation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334466,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/05\/using-recorded-telephonic-conversation-as-evidence-violates-right-to-privacy-thus-not-admissible-as-evidence-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":327253,"position":1},"title":"Using recorded telephonic conversation between wife and her mother as evidence violates right to privacy, thus not admissible as evidence: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Arushi","date":"November 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The right to hold a telephone conversation in the privacy of one\u2019s home\/office without interference can certainly be claimed as a \u201cRight to Privacy.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/14\/maintenance-cannot-be-denied-solely-because-wife-is-leading-modern-lifestyle-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327253,"position":2},"title":"Maintenance cannot be denied solely because wife is leading modern lifestyle: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court deliberated on whether morality could supersede legal provisions and questioned if leading a modern lifestyle could be deemed immoral.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/unnatural-sex-by-man-with-wife-residing-with-him-not-offence-under-section-377-ipc-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327253,"position":3},"title":"Unnatural sex by husband with wife not offence under Section 377 IPC: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that under Section 375 of IPC any sexual intercourse or sexual act by the husband with his wife not below the age of fifteen years is not a rape, therefore, absence of consent of wife for unnatural act loses its importance.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/mere-trivial-disputes-within-domestic-life-do-not-necessarily-constitute-abetment-to-suicide-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327253,"position":4},"title":"Trivial domestic disputes do not necessarily constitute \u2018Abetment to Suicide\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that wife compelling the husband to do household chores, not preparing food on time, going to the market for shopping purposes, etc., are trivial dispute within domestic life.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/17\/misuse-of-advocate-client-relationship-mp-high-court-denies-to-quash-fir-in-rape-allegations-against-advocate-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327253,"position":5},"title":"Misuse of Advocate-Client Relationship | MP High Court refuses to quash FIR in Rape allegations against Advocate","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStatement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC cannot be given preference over the FIR and the statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327253\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}