{"id":327216,"date":"2024-07-24T14:00:23","date_gmt":"2024-07-24T08:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327216"},"modified":"2024-07-30T11:03:35","modified_gmt":"2024-07-30T05:33:35","slug":"mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> Petitioners, who were accused in a case pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 40th Court, Girgaum, at Mumbai, under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Corresponding Section 296 of the Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (&#8216;BNS&#8217;).\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">114<\/a><a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Section 54, BNS.\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a>, read with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a><a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. Section 3(5), BNS.\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683237\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683242\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8(1), 8(2), 8(3), and 8(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683662\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (working therein) Act, 2016<\/a>, had filed the present petition seeking quashing of the said case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of A.S. Gadkari and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Shyam C. Chandak*<\/span>, JJ., opined that no other specific overt act was attributed to petitioners to attract the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">114<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> against them. Therefore, mere presence of petitioners at the hotel as &#8216;customers&#8217;, when the two women were dancing allegedly in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract the said offence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 18-09-2019, Police Head Constable-informant was on surveillance duty to inform about the objectionable activities taking place in bars and restaurants within his jurisdictional area. During the said duty, he visited Sandeep Palace Bar and Restaurant and found that two women were dancing there in an obscene manner. Immediately, he informed that fact to Girgaum Police Station. Thereafter, a police team along with two Punch, one punter and in-charge of Social Service Branch went to the hotel and verified the situation there. They saw that two women were dancing in an obscene manner and customers gave Indian currency notes to waiter and told him to blow the said notes on the dancing women and thus, they were aiding and abetting them to do the dance. The Petitioners were present amongst said customers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The informant lodged the report against petitioners as they were present amongst the customers in that hotel. Thereafter, FIR was registered, and petitioners and other accused persons were arrested. On completion of investigation, police submitted charge-sheet for the said offences, however, petitioners submitted they were innocent, and hence, filed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that petitioners were figured in FIR as &#8216;customers&#8217;, who were present in the hotel when the women were dancing. It was also noted that the waiter concerned could not be examined by the Investigating Officer as he had already left.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that there was no material to show that when the customers gave the Indian Currency notes to the waiter, petitioners were amongst the said customers and they only gave currency notes to the waiter with a specific instruction to blow it on the dancing women. The Court opined that no other specific overt act was attributed to petitioners to attract the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">114<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> against them. Therefore, mere presence of petitioners at the relevant place and time, as &#8216;customers&#8217;, when the two women were dancing allegedly in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract the said offence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Manish Parshottam Rughwani<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span><a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. Cril. Writ Petition (ST) No. 4343 of 2024.\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a>, decided on 05-04-2024, wherein the Bombay High Court quashed the FIR for similar offence alleged against the customers, because petitioners therein were merely present in the bar at the relevant time, however, no specific overt act was attributed to them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court allowed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Nirav Raval v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/TR71yQnf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 2339<\/a>, decided on 12-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Shyam C. Chandak<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> Laxmi Raman a\/w Nigel Quraishy<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> M. M. Deshmukh, APP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Corresponding Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803651\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">296<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (&#8216;BNS&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803741\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">54<\/a>, <doclink docname=\"Nyaya Sanhita, 2023\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"BNS\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">BNS<\/doclink>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803655\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(5)<\/a>, <doclink docname=\"Nyaya Sanhita, 2023\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"BNS\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">BNS<\/doclink>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> Cril. Writ Petition (ST) No. 4343 of 2024.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">No other specific overt act is attributed to petitioners to attract the offences punishable under Sections 294, 114 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 against them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3201,2569,45260,13961,68043,68044,71336,71338,4141,71337,66000,71339],"class_list":["post-327216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abetment","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-customer","tag-ipc","tag-justice-a-s-gadkari","tag-justice-shyam-c-chandak","tag-maharashtra-prohibition-of-obscene-dance-in-hotels","tag-obscene-dance","tag-obscenity","tag-restaurants-and-bar-rooms-and-protection-of-dignity-of-women-working-therein-act-2016","tag-section-114","tag-section-294"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women were dancing in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract offence under Section 294 of IPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women were dancing in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract offence under Section 294 of IPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-24T08:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-30T05:33:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/\",\"name\":\"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-24T08:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-30T05:33:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court held that mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women were dancing in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract offence under Section 294 of IPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay HC","description":"Bombay High Court held that mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women were dancing in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract offence under Section 294 of IPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court","og_description":"Bombay High Court held that mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women were dancing in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract offence under Section 294 of IPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-24T08:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-30T05:33:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/","name":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-24T08:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-30T05:33:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court held that mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women were dancing in obscene manner, was not sufficient to attract offence under Section 294 of IPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":304921,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327216,"position":0},"title":"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts","author":"Arunima","date":"October 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Taking a narrow view as to what acts could constitute an obscenity would be a retrograde act. Surely the provisions of Section 294 of IPC would not apply to all the situations and thus, the Court cannot countenance a situation where acts such as the ones referred to in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":227037,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/14\/bom-hc-sending-personal-messages-on-whatsapp-does-not-amount-to-utterance-of-obscene-words-in-public-place-s-294-ipc-cannot-be-invoked\/","url_meta":{"origin":327216,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Sending personal messages on WhatsApp does not amount to utterance of obscene words in public place; S. 294 IPC cannot be invoked","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of M.G. Sewlikar and T.V. Nalawade, JJ. while disposing off an application, held that, \"To call a woman, even if she is one's own wife a prostitute and to call her that she earns money by indulging in prostitution amounts to insulting the modesty of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":44391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/20\/obscene-act-in-private-place-will-be-no-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":327216,"position":2},"title":"Obscene act in private place will be no offence","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Quashing an FIR against men who were arrested from a party, a bench comprising of Naresh H Patil and A M Badar, JJ held that any obscene act in a private place causing no annoyance to others does not constitute an offence. In the present case, an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/26\/kerala-high-court-reiterates-that-to-satisfy-definition-of-obscenity-to-attract-section-294b-ipc-the-words-uttered-must-be-capable-of-arousing-sexually-impure-thoughts-in-mi\/","url_meta":{"origin":327216,"position":3},"title":"Words uttered must be capable of arousing sexually impure thoughts in minds of hearers to satisfy definition of obscenity to attract Section 294(b) IPC; Kerala High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"If the act is not obscene, or is not done in any public place, or the song recited or uttered is not in or near any public place or that it caused no annoyance to others, no offence under Section 294(b) of IPC is committed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":323461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/03\/annoyance-to-others-prerequisite-to-invoke-offence-s-294-ipc-allahabad-hc-while-quashing-criminal-case-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":327216,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Annoyance to others\u2019 a prerequisite to invoke offence under Section 294 of IPC; Allahabad HC quashes criminal case","author":"Editor","date":"June 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The issue of \"obscenity or indecency per se\" will not arise until or unless there is evidence on record to see that a person at a given time witnessing particular obscene act is actually annoyed or not.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/06\/whether-wife-can-claim-sexual-act-by-her-husband-is-without-consent-mp-hc-answers-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":327216,"position":5},"title":"Can a wife claim that sexual act by her husband is without consent? Madhya Pradesh HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that as per the amended definition of rape, any sexual intercourse or act, by the husband with his wife not below the age of fifteen years is not a rape, therefore, consent is immaterial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327216\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}