{"id":327095,"date":"2024-07-22T17:00:02","date_gmt":"2024-07-22T11:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327095"},"modified":"2024-07-30T10:43:47","modified_gmt":"2024-07-30T05:13:47","slug":"interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Karnataka High Court:<\/span> While considering the instant appeal, wherein the Court had to consider that whether an order refusing or granting ex-parte interim measure on an application under Section 9<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (A&C Act) falling under ‘Commercial Arbitration Dispute’ is appealable order under Section 37<\/a> of the A&C Act<\/a>; or whether such an appeal is barred under the proviso to Section 13(1A)<\/a> of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/a>, the Division Bench of Anu Sivaraman and Anant Ramanath Hegde*<\/span>, JJ., opined that an order granting or declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under Section 37<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a>, even if a dispute under Section 9<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a> is before the Commercial Court.<\/p>\n

The Division Bench also overruled Symphony Services Corporation (India) Private Limited, Bangalore v. Sudip Bhattacharjee<\/span>, 2007 SCC OnLine Kar 368<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Contentions:<\/span> The appellant contended that the power to grant interim order under Section 9<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a> also includes the power to grant ex-parte interim order. Such power is expressly recognized in the High Court of Karnataka Arbitration (Proceedings before the Courts) Rules, 2001 (2001 Rules). Thus, an order issuing an emergent notice and declining ex-parte order is also an appealable order under Section 37<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a><\/p>\n

Per contra<\/span>, the respondents contended that the instant appeal challenging the order of the Commercial Court issuing emergent notice, and declining ‘ex-parte’ interim measure on an application under Section 9<\/a> of the A&C Act, 1996<\/a> is not maintainable.<\/p>\n

The respondents further argued that in a proceeding under A&C Act<\/a>, in respect of a Commercial Arbitration Dispute, the appeal under Section 37<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a> is maintainable against an interlocutory order, only if such order falls under Order 43 of CPC, in view of the proviso to Section 13(1A)<\/a> of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Issue Before the Court:<\/span> The Court had to consider the interplay of Sections 9<\/a> and 37<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a>, Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act and Rule 9 of 2001 Rules.<\/p>\n

The issue was that whether the expression “granting or refusing to grant any measure under Section 9<\/a><\/span>” appearing in Section 37<\/a> of Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996<\/a> (A&C Act) includes only a ‘final order<\/span>’ under Section 9, or it includes an ‘ex-parte interim measure’<\/p>\n

Court’s Assessment:<\/p>\n

The Court noted that due to the introduction of the non-obstante clause in S. 37<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a> by way of 2019 Amendment, there is no dispute on the point that under Section 37 the final order granting or refusing to grant any interim measure under Section 9 is appealable. The non-obstante clause in S. 37 takes care of any inconsistency in any other law providing for an appeal in respect of the matters covered under the A&C Act.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that if the expression, “granting or refusing to grant any measure under Section 9<\/span>” appearing in Section 37(1)(b)<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a>, includes the order granting or refusing the ex-parte interim order, then under Section 37, appeal against such an order is maintainable.<\/p>\n

Examining the relevant portions of R. 9 of High Court of Karnataka Arbitration (Proceedings before the Courts) Rules, 2001, the Court stated that the language used in 2001 Rules, particularly the expression, “When an application is made for an interim measure, under Section 9<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, the Court shall in all cases, except where it appears that the object of granting the interim measure would be defeated by the delay before passing the interim order, direct notice of the application to be given to the opposite party<\/span>”, clearly suggests that the ex-parte interim measure, if granted, is in exercise of power under Section 9<\/a> of the A&C Act<\/a> itself.<\/p>\n

Rule 9 of 2001 Rules does not confer the power to pass an ex-parte order, but it only recognizes the power inherent in Section 9<\/a> of the A&C Act<\/a> and Rule 9 also deals with the procedure to be followed in case of ex-parte order.<\/p>\n

The Court further pointed out that there is nothing in the language of Section 13<\/a> of Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/a> to hold that the only ‘final order’ under Section 9 is appealable under Section 37 read with Section 13<\/a> of Commercial Courts Act<\/a> when it comes to arbitration disputes coming under the jurisdiction of the Commercial Courts Act.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court was of the view that an order granting or declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37 even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court.<\/p>\n

Conclusions:<\/p>\n

The Court concluded that appeal under Section 37<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> is maintainable against an order granting or refusing ex-parte interim measure under Section 9<\/a> of the A&C Act<\/a>, even if the application under Section 9 is filed before the Commercial Court, as defined under Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court further concluded that as a corollary, appeal under Section 37<\/a> of A&C Act<\/a> is maintainable against an order granting or refusing ex-parte interim measure under Section 9<\/a>, if the Section 9<\/a> application is filed before the Court exercising jurisdiction under the A&C Act, 1996<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Though the appeal under Section 37<\/a> of the Act, 1996<\/a> is maintainable against the order refusing ‘ex-parte’ measure, the scope of interference in such appeal is limited as the Appellate Court is only required to consider whether consideration of prayer of ex-parte interim measure can be deferred till the appearance of the respondent.<\/p>\n

In an appeal under Section 37<\/a> of the Act, 1996<\/a> against the order granting ‘ex-parte’ measure, the appeal may be entertained only in exceptional cases as the aggrieved party will have an efficacious remedy of moving the same Court which passed the order, to vacate the ‘ex-parte order.<\/p>\n

[KLR Group Enterprises v. Madhu H.V., 2024 SCC OnLine Kar 65<\/a>, decided on 19-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the appellants:<\/span> DHANANJAY JOSHI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SHASHIDHAR R, ADVOCATE<\/p>\n

For the respondents:<\/span> PRASHANTH G., ADVOCATE FOR R1, ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR COUNSEL A\/W PRASANNA B.R, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R5<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the instant appeal, the Court had to consider the interplay of Sections 9 and 37 of the A&C Act; Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Rule 9 of High Court of Karnataka Arbitration (Proceedings before the Courts) Rules, 2001.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":316069,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,3226,47046,31574,44724],"class_list":["post-327095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-arbitration","tag-commercial-court","tag-ex-parte-order","tag-interpretation-of-statutes"],"yoast_head":"\nOrder granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996, even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court: Karnataka HC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996, even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court: Karnataka HC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-22T11:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-30T05:13:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-22T11:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-30T05:13:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996, even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court: Karnataka HC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC","description":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996, even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court: Karnataka HC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC","og_description":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996, even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court: Karnataka HC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-22T11:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-30T05:13:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-22T11:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-30T05:13:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996, even if a dispute under S. 9 is before the Commercial Court: Karnataka HC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":330009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/roundup-top-case-laws-on-arbitration-july-august-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":327095,"position":0},"title":"Top cases on Arbitration Law from July to August 2024","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick recap of the latest rulings on Arbitration Law by the High Courts.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitration Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Arbitration-Roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/31\/clash-of-the-courts-an-analysis-into-the-complications-intertwined-in-the-commercial-courts-act-2015-while-dealing-with-jurisdiction-over-arbitration-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":327095,"position":1},"title":"Clash of the Courts — An analysis into the complications intertwined in the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 while dealing with Jurisdiction over Arbitration Disputes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Nanda Surendran*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Clash of the Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Clash-of-the-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Clash-of-the-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Clash-of-the-Courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Clash-of-the-Courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":327095,"position":2},"title":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appellate power under Section 37","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/ker-hc-whether-an-order-passed-under-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-by-a-commercial-court-appealable-under-s-131-of-commercial-courts-act-2015-hc-determines\/","url_meta":{"origin":327095,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Whether an order passed under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by a Commercial Court, appealable under S.13(1) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015; HC determines","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: R.Narayana Pisharadi J., while allowing the statutory remedy of appeal, discussed the parallel application of provisions and the Court\u2019s power of supervision under Article 227. Background Factual matrix of the present case states first petitioner as a Company, second petitioner as a Chief Executive Officer and third\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/14\/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-commercial-court-order-for-lack-merit-based-analysis-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327095,"position":4},"title":"Non-Disclosure of petition cannot be termed as egregious fraud: Delhi High Court sets aside Commercial Court order for lack of merit-based analysis","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The non-disclosure of the petition under Section 9 of the A&C Act in another matter cannot be termed as a case of egregious fraud, which would disentitle the appellant from pursuing its petition under Section 9 of the A&C Act","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/20\/intra-court-appeal-in-patent-disputes-not-maintainable-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":327095,"position":5},"title":"Intra-court appeal not maintainable in patent disputes; Commercial Courts Act overrides Letters Patent of High Court: Madras High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny expansion of the scope of the Commercial Courts Act would defeat its objectives, and there is no ambiguity regarding appeals from decrees of Commercial Courts and Commercial Divisions under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"intra-court appeal patent disputes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327095"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327095\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}