{"id":327059,"date":"2024-07-22T13:00:10","date_gmt":"2024-07-22T07:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=327059"},"modified":"2024-08-08T18:00:57","modified_gmt":"2024-08-08T12:30:57","slug":"no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed against the order passed by the Superintendent of Police (\u2018SP\u2019), wherein he directed that the petitioner should not be paid his salary for the period during which he was out of service on the principle of \u2018no work no pay\u2019, Salil Kumar Rai, J. held that the petitioner had been wrongly denied his salary for the period between 9-1-2020 to 29-9-2020, therefore, he is entitled to the cost of the writ petition which is quantified as Rs.25,000\/- and is also entitled to interest on the pay and allowances payable to him for the period he was out of service.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court directed the SP to pay the petitioner his full pay and allowances for the period of absence along with simple interest calculated at the rate of 6% per annum and also, the cost of the writ petition within a period of one month from the date of this order.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/p>\n

The petitioner is employed as a follower with the U.P Police. Thereafter, Disciplinary proceedings were instituted against him under Rule 14 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 1991 (\u2018Rules, 1991\u2019) and a charge sheet was served on the petitioner. The charge against the petitioner was that the petitioner, without informing his Officers and without any leave, was absent from duty for 3 days. Another charge against the petitioner was that after joining, the petitioner went on hunger strike and refused to resume his mess duty which adversely affected the reputation of the police force.<\/p>\n

The petitioner denied the charges against him and the inquiry report was submitted on holding the petitioner guilty of the charges levelled against him. Thereafter, the SP dismissed the petitioner from service. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal, which was allowed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, and he exonerated the petitioner of the charges levelled against him. Consequently, the SP, reinstated the petitioner in service.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, the SP issued notice to the petitioner to show cause as to why his services for the period the petitioner was out of service be not regularised without payment of salary on the principle of \u2018no work no pay\u2019.<\/p>\n

The SP has denied salary to the petitioner for the period he was out of service on the ground that the acts of the petitioner for which he had been charged were acts of gross negligence and amounted to dereliction of duty. The order has been challenged in the present petition.<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/span> Whether the petitioner was entitled to his salary for the period during which the petitioner was not in service had to be considered and decided under Rule 54 of the Financial Handbook Volume-II (Part II to IV)?<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/p>\n

After taking note of Rules 54(2) and 54(4) of the Financial Handbook in Uttar Pradesh, the Court noted that the principle ‘no work-no pay’ is not applicable while considering the entitlement of State Government employees for pay and allowances for the period they were not in service, if the order dismissing, removing or compulsory retiring them from service is set aside either in appeal or review and the government servant is reinstated in service and no further inquiry is proposed to be held. Thus, on his reinstatement after the order of dismissal or removal is set aside, a government servant cannot be denied his entire pay and allowances for the period he was out of service.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted that the amount the government servant would be entitled to get would depend on whether the government servant’s case is covered by Rule 54(2) or by Rule 54(4).<\/p>\n

The Court said that as the order dismissing the petitioner has been set aside in appeal and the petitioner has been fully exonerated by the appellate authority vide its order dated 4-9-2020, therefore, the case of the petitioner is covered by Rule 54(2).<\/p>\n

The petitioner was not earning through any employment elsewhere for the period he was out of service. Thus, the petitioner cannot be denied his salary by invoking Rule 54(8). Thus, by virtue of Rules 54(2) and 54(3), the petitioner is entitled to full pay and allowances for the period between 9-1-2020 to 29-9-2020 and his absence from service during the said period has to be treated as a period spent on duty for all purposes.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court quashed the order passed by the Superintendent of Police for being illegal and contrary to law.<\/p>\n

[Dinesh Prasad v. State of UP, 2024 SCC OnLine All 3604<\/a>, decided on 16-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By virtue of Rules 54(2) and 54(3), the petitioner is entitled to full pay and allowances for the period between 9-1-2020 to 29-9-2020 and his absence from service during the said period has to be treated as a period spent on duty for all purposes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,14371,71239,71240,71237,71238,2775,2729,17731],"class_list":["post-327059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-disciplinary-proceedings","tag-exoneration-allahabad-high-court","tag-justice-salil-kumar-rai","tag-no-work-no-pay-principle","tag-period-of-absence","tag-Punishment","tag-Reinstatement","tag-uttar-pradesh"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court held that \u2018no work-no pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon their reinstatement after exoneration\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court held that \u2018no work-no pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon their reinstatement after exoneration\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-22T07:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-08T12:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-22T07:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-08T12:30:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court held that \u2018no work-no pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon their reinstatement after exoneration\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad High Court held that \u2018no work-no pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon their reinstatement after exoneration","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC","og_description":"Allahabad High Court held that \u2018no work-no pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon their reinstatement after exoneration","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-22T07:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-08T12:30:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/","name":"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-22T07:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-08T12:30:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabad High Court held that \u2018no work-no pay\u2019 principle not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon their reinstatement after exoneration","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/no-work-no-pay-principle-not-applicable-govt-employees-period-of-absence-upon-reinstatement-exoneration-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No Work-No Pay\u2019 principle is not applicable to Govt. employees for the period of absence, upon reinstatement after exoneration: Allahabad HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/suspended-employee-acquitted-entitled-back-wages\/","url_meta":{"origin":327059,"position":0},"title":"Not justified to deny back wages on principle \u2018no work no pay\u2019; Allahabad HC directs payment of salary to employee after acquittal in criminal case","author":"Editor","date":"April 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe principle of 'no work no pay' could have been attracted if petitioner had enjoyed bail in criminal case and had not been merely kept under suspension.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","url_meta":{"origin":327059,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a writ petition which was initially filed in the Allahabad High Court in 1994. Factual matrix of the case was that the petitioner was appointed as a Panchayat Mantri and thereafter the Panchayat Mantries\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/01\/no-work-no-pay\/","url_meta":{"origin":327059,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | The principle of ‘No Work No Pay’ would not be applicable where the rule expressly direct otherwise; Matter remitted back to consider grant of full pay and allowances","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal, J., allowed the writ petition and remitted the matter to the appellate authority to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of full pay and allowances in light of sub-rule (2) of Rule 54 of the Fundamental Rules. The petitioner herein being Jail\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/20\/ph-hc-grants-back-wages-to-police-officers-who-were-reinstated-after-their-dismissal\/","url_meta":{"origin":327059,"position":3},"title":"‘Dispensing with inquiry should be an exception and not the rule’; P&H HC grants back wages to police officers who were reinstated after their dismissal","author":"Arushi","date":"June 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that this was not the isolated case where the jurisdictional SSP of State had dispensed with inquiry. As soon as an FIR was registered against the police official, the jurisdictional SSPs opted to dispense with inquiry.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/25\/simultaneous-action-will-not-apply-in-departmental-and-criminal-proceedings-covered-by-bipartite-settlement-allahabad-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":327059,"position":4},"title":"General principle of simultaneous action will not apply in departmental and criminal proceedings covered by Bipartite Settlement: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the Tribunal has not considered the effect of acquittal of the petitioner from the identical criminal charges. The judgment is completely silent about the same. This is an apparent perversity on the part of the Tribunal.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/election-petition-dismissed-by-deputy-district-magistrate-as-petitioner-failed-to-establish-her-case-writ-rejected-for-lack-of-merit\/","url_meta":{"origin":327059,"position":5},"title":"Election Petition dismissed by Deputy District Magistrate as petitioner failed to establish her case, writ rejected for lack of merit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The writ petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Salil Kumar Rai, J., against judgment and order passed by Deputy District Magistrate where an Election Petition filed by petitioner was dismissed. Facts of the case were that one of the respondents was the elected\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327059","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327059"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327059\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}