{"id":326976,"date":"2024-07-20T14:00:01","date_gmt":"2024-07-20T08:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=326976"},"modified":"2024-07-30T10:34:35","modified_gmt":"2024-07-30T05:04:35","slug":"mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> seeking quashment of Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)&#8217;s show cause notice to stop construction and bring necessary clearance\/permission documents for inspection, a single-judge bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., held that writ cannot be issued for restraining the respondent authorities from taking coercive actions against petitioner as the direction to stop construction is not a final order because the same is based on an interim measure pending further inquiry. While acknowledging the petitioner did not receive a copy of the enquiry report which was a basis for the show-cause notice, the Court disposed of the petition with the specific observations regarding enquiry report and spot inspection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner filed a petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> seeking the quashment of the show cause notice dated 18-06-2024 issued by the respondent, SDO (Revenue), Baihar, District Balaghat, issuance of Writ Mandamus for restraining the authorities from taking coercive actions against petitioner and restraining the authorities from unnecessarily harassing the petitioner without any authority of law. The impugned notice ordered the petitioner to stop construction immediately and to appear before the concerning officer with the necessary documents for clearances\/permissions on 19-06-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner claimed that the notice was issued to gain cheap popularity and that no construction had been initiated on the land. The petitioner argued that the enquiry report, which was the basis for the show cause notice, had not been provided. The petitioner further claimed that the show cause notice was issued without any basis and was aimed at harassing the petitioner. However, the respondent cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kunisetty Satyanarayana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/A91ifo12\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2006) 12 SCC 28<\/a> and argued that writ petitions against show cause notices are not maintainable. The respondents claimed that the notice was issued lawfully, providing the petitioner an opportunity to present his case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While referencing <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kunisetty Satyanarayana<\/span> (Supra), the Court held that a writ petition against a show cause notice is generally not maintainable. The Court observed that the direction to stop construction was not a final order as it was based on an interim measure pending further inquiry. The Court noted that the petitioner was given an opportunity to present his case and had filed a response claiming no construction was undertaken. The Court further noted that whether petitioner is raising any construction or not, is a disputed question of fact which cannot be decided by this Court.<\/p>\n<p>The Court acknowledged the petitioner&#8217;s contention about not receiving the enquiry report and observed that:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>If the petitioner applies for the enquiry report, it must be supplied within 3 days of the application.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>If the petitioner requests a spot inspection, it should be conducted by the competent authority, with the date fixed and binding on all parties.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>If the petitioner\/his authorized person fails to participate in the spot inspection, he cannot later claim it was conducted in his absence.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The petitioner can file objections to the spot inspection within 3 days from the inspection.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The SDO (Revenue) must decide the show-cause notice after hearing the petitioner within 15 days from the spot inspection report filing.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court asserted that if the petitioner does not apply for the enquiry report or spot inspection within 15 days, the above-mentioned observations will lose effect. The Court emphasised that it did not address the merits of the allegations or the petitioner&#8217;s defense, leaving the proceedings to be decided based on evidence. The Court further opined that if a final order has already been passed, the petitioner may prefer an appeal, and the appellate authority should resolve the factual dispute as necessary. The Court disposed of the present petition with the above-mentioned observations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Randeep Hooda<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/37pjqIir\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 4884<\/a>, Decided on 18-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Siddharth Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Mohan Sausarkar, Govt. Advocate, Counsel for the Respondents\/State<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court held that a writ petition against a show-cause notice is generally not maintainable, as established in Union of India v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana, (2006) 12 SCC 28.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71191,32395,32099,32932,61228,7201,18281,71193,71192,13551],"class_list":["post-326976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-direction-to-stop-construction","tag-enquiry-report","tag-final-order","tag-interim-measure","tag-justice-g-s-ahluwalia","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-show-cause-notice","tag-spot-inspection","tag-writ-mandamus","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court denied the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court denied the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-20T08:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-30T05:04:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-20T08:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-30T05:04:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":683,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"direction to stop construction\",\"Enquiry Report\",\"Final Order\",\"Interim Measure\",\"Justice G.S. Ahluwalia\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"show-cause notice\",\"spot inspection\",\"Writ Mandamus\",\"writ petition\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-20T08:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-30T05:04:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court denied the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/20\\\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court denied the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction","og_description":"MP High Court denied the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-20T08:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-30T05:04:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction","datePublished":"2024-07-20T08:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-30T05:04:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/"},"wordCount":683,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","keywords":["direction to stop construction","Enquiry Report","Final Order","Interim Measure","Justice G.S. Ahluwalia","Madhya Pradesh High Court","show-cause notice","spot inspection","Writ Mandamus","writ petition"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/","name":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-20T08:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-30T05:04:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court denied the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-denies-writ-of-mandamus-to-restrain-authority-from-taking-coercive-actions-based-on-alleged-illegal-stop-construction-interim-direction-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP High Court denies Writ of Mandamus to restrain authority from taking coercive actions based on alleged \u2018illegal\u2019 stop-construction interim direction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222988,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/09\/mp-hc-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-is-not-maintainable-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":326976,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Writ Petition against a private individual is not maintainable, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. while dismissing the petition, observed that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy of filing a Civil Suit against illegal possession of the land. In the instant case, reliefs in the nature of writ of certiorari was sought to be issued to declare the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/10\/mp-hc-writ-of-mandamus-under-art-226-cannot-be-issued-for-compelling-police-to-perform-a-statutory-duty-under-s-154-crpc-without-availing-all-the-other-alternative-remedies-as-prescribed-in-crimin\/","url_meta":{"origin":326976,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Writ of mandamus cannot be issued for compelling police to perform a statutory duty under S. 154 CrPC without availing all other alternative remedies prescribed in CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India to direct the respondents to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint made by her. The main question before the High Court to decide was \u2018whether a writ petition under Article\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":326976,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming that the Additional Director General of Police was unlawfully encroaching upon their land.\u00a0 The petitioners had claimed that they had approached the relevant authorities, but no action was taken by them. They subsequently filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/04\/a-writ-for-mandamus-cannot-lie-to-direct-the-state-to-enact-a-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":326976,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | A writ for mandamus cannot lie to direct the State to enact a law; Petition dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"March 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J.dismissed a petition which was filed in public interest praying for a writ of mandamus to incorporate certain provisions in the law, namely, Section 14-A of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 and Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":326948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/construction-of-public-utility-premises-near-hanuman-mandir-not-detrimental-to-atmosphere-and-ecological-balance-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":326976,"position":4},"title":"Construction of public utility premises near Hanuman Mandir not detrimental to temple\u2019s atmosphere and ecological balance: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the petitioner\u2019s failure to provide sufficient details and his criminal background further undermined his petition","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/margadarsi-chit-fund-declaring-actions-state-andhra-pradesh-assistant-registrars-refusing-perform-statutory-functions-illegal-arbitrary\/","url_meta":{"origin":326976,"position":5},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court grants relief to Margadarsi Chit Fund; restricts State from taking coercive action","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view that \u201cInsofar as balance of convenience and irreparable loss are concerned, the petitioner is not a defaulter as of now and there is no complaint by any subscriber to that effect. Even the authorities did not complain receiving of any complaint qua default in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-491.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326976\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=326976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=326976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}