{"id":326178,"date":"2024-07-10T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2024-07-10T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=326178"},"modified":"2024-07-17T12:42:02","modified_gmt":"2024-07-17T07:12:02","slug":"mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) seeking quashment of FIR registered for the offence punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), a single-judge bench of Sanjay Dwivedi, J., quashed the FIR against the petitioner based on delay in lodging the FIR, combined with the complainant&#8217;s history of similar allegations and the petitioner&#8217;s credible defense. The Court held that the prosecution against the petitioner appears to be malicious, instituted with ulterior motives, and constitutes an abuse of the legal process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the complainant lodged an FIR on 16-02-2022, at 13:52 hours for an incident that allegedly occurred on 30-06-2020, at about 12:00 noon. The complainant stated that she started chatting on WhatsApp with the petitioner and met him on 30-06-2020. The complainant alleged that the petitioner, along with co-accused, took her to a house in CNit Colony where the petitioner committed sexual intercourse on the pretext of marriage. Later, she discovered that the petitioner was already married, and he refused to marry her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner argued that there was a significant delay in lodging the FIR and claimed that the complainant is involved in a &#8220;honey trap&#8221; racket aimed at extorting money from individuals. The petitioner contended that he lodged an FIR against the complainant for demanding Rs. 10 Lakhs in order to not implicate in a false case of rape, blackmailing and extortion, leading to her arrest. The petitioner contended that he provided an affidavit for no objection to bail for the complainant, resulting in her bail, but the complainant is pressurising the petitioner to settle the matter. The petitioner also highlighted the several past instances where the complainant lodged similar complaints against other individuals, suggesting a pattern of false allegations for monetary gain. On the other hand, the respondent although not denied the factual aspects, argued that at this stage, it is improper to quash the FIR based on the petitioner&#8217;s claims about the complainant&#8217;s past behavior.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the complainant had lodged similar complaints against multiple individuals, suggesting a possible pattern of extortion and malicious prosecution. The Court stated that the complainant in the affidavit stated that she receivied Rs. 3,50,000\/- from an accused and later retracted her allegations further cast doubt on her credibility. The Court stated that the FIR was filed almost two years after the incident, which is a significant delay, especially given the complainant&#8217;s conduct and lack of explanation for the delay. The Court asserted that while delay in reporting rape is not always material, however, in the present case, it is crucial due to the complainant&#8217;s history and the timing of her allegations. The Court further noted that the petitioner registered a complaint against the complainant alleging extortion and harassment prior to the complainant&#8217;s FIR, supporting his defense.<\/p>\n<p>The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhajanlal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/PrBF91ZF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1992 Supp (1) SCC 335<\/a>, where the Supreme Court laid down the guidelines for quashing proceedings under extraordinary and inherent powers to prevent abuse of the process of law. The guidelines are as follows &#8212;<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>If the allegations in the FIR, taken at face value, do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>When the allegations in the FIR and accompanying materials do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying police investigation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">156(1)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> without an order from a Magistrate under Section 155(2).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>If the uncontroverted allegations in the FIR and the evidence collected do not disclose the commission of any offence or establish a case against the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>When the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence but only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permissible by a police officer without a Magistrate&#8217;s order under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519390\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">155(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>If the allegations in the FIR or complaint are so absurd and inherently improbable that no prudent person can reach a just conclusion sufficient to proceed against the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Where there is a specific legal bar under the CrPC or the concerned Act preventing the institution or continuation of criminal proceedings, or where there exists an alternative redressal mechanism for the grievance of the aggrieved party.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">When a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala-fide or is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive, such as vengeance due to personal grudge against the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deepak Gulati<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QGHaIcmD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2013) 7 SCC 675<\/a>, where the Supreme Court differentiated between consensual sex and rape under false promises of marriage. The Court noted that mere breach of a promise to marry without malafide intention does not amount to rape. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dhruvram Murlidhar Sona<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8NEV43mg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2019) 18 SCC 191<\/a>, where the Supreme Court reiterated that the exercise of power under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> is an exception and not the rule, intended to prevent abuse of the legal process and to secure justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the FIR against the petitioner was lodged with mala fide intentions and ulterior motives to extort money. Applying the principles laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhajan Lal<\/span> (Supra), the Court exercised its power under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and quashed the FIR and all consequential actions and investigations thereto.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kuldeep Dubey<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T0qJ6v3c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 4763<\/a>, order dated 03-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Sanjay Dwivedi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Eshaan Datt, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Amit Bhurrak, Panel Lawyer, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court held that while delay in reporting rape is not always material, in the present case, it is crucial due to the complainant&#8217;s history and the timing of her allegations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[60875,62956,58674,7201,36368,50352,2572,70791],"class_list":["post-326178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-legal-process","tag-honey-trap","tag-justice-sanjay-dwivedi","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-malicious-prosecution","tag-quashment-of-fir","tag-Rape","tag-ulterior-motive"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP High Court quashes FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court quashed a FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court quashed a FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-10T05:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-17T07:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"MP High Court quashes FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-10T05:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-17T07:12:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court quashed a FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP High Court quashes FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court quashed a FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator","og_description":"MP High Court quashed a FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-10T05:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-17T07:12:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/","name":"MP High Court quashes FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-10T05:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-17T07:12:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court quashed a FIR for Rape lodged by Honey trap racket operator.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":308489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":326178,"position":0},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"December 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasised that a purely civil dispute should not be converted into a criminal prosecution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":326178,"position":1},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji","author":"Ritu","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The present case is \u201cnothing but the assimilation of personal and political antipathies, more precisely, a politically oriented-animosity, which makes the petitioner's prosecution malicious.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/14\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-court-finds-rape-charges-vexatious-and-frivolous-fir-quashed-after-delay-of-18-years-to-file-a-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":326178,"position":2},"title":"MP HC \u2502 Court finds rape charges &#8220;vexatious and frivolous &#8220;; FIR quashed after delay of 18 years to file a case","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Anand Pathak, J. allowed a petition which was preferred under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of FIR registered against the petitioner and consequential\u00a0 criminal proceedings for offence under Sections 376, 506 of Penal Code, 1860.\u00a0 \u00a0 An FIR was registered by respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/17\/delay-in-filing-fir-subsequent-marriage-raises-doubts-about-credibility-of-rape-allegations-mp-high-court-quashes-fir-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":326178,"position":3},"title":"No physical injuries, delayed FIR &amp; subsequent marriage: MP High Court quashes Rape charges amid doubt over prosecutrix&#8217;s credibility","author":"Ritu","date":"June 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo reasonable person would believe the prosecutrix's allegations given the circumstances and inconsistencies in her statements.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/09\/failed-long-term-relationships-not-ground-for-filing-rape-firs-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":326178,"position":4},"title":"Failed Long-term relationships not ground for filing Rape FIRs: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018In a young age when relationship develops, they naturally carry impression that they will get married. However, sometimes it fails, and the girl, considering herself to be betrayed and deceived, cannot lodge the FIR saying that rape has been committed with her.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/17\/misuse-of-advocate-client-relationship-mp-high-court-denies-to-quash-fir-in-rape-allegations-against-advocate-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":326178,"position":5},"title":"Misuse of Advocate-Client Relationship | MP High Court refuses to quash FIR in Rape allegations against Advocate","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStatement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC cannot be given preference over the FIR and the statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326178"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326178\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=326178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=326178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}