{"id":326061,"date":"2024-07-08T17:00:35","date_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=326061"},"modified":"2024-07-17T14:40:45","modified_gmt":"2024-07-17T09:10:45","slug":"jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/","title":{"rendered":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed to quash the orders issued by the respondent authorities, whereby the petitioner&#8217;s pay scale was reduced, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Prasad, J.<\/span>, stated that there was no misrepresentation or suppression on the petitioner&#8217;s part to get the said pay scale and it was only due to lapses on the part of the authorities of the State Government this situation arose. The Court noted that the petitioner agreed to pay due amount of Rs. 6,28,557 in instalments on 30-12-2016 itself, i.e. just ten months before his retirement on 31-10-2019. However, this undertaking given on behalf of the petitioner was completely under coercion and threat. The Court stated that recovery of excess amount from the employee was not permissible, if there was no misrepresentation or suppression by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court set aside the impugned letters dated 17-11-2016 and 02-12-2016 issued by the respondent authorities. Further, the respondents were directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner and the department was further directed to release the amount recovered from the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was appointed as Draftsmen Category-II on 22-11-1987, and a scale was fixed vide Memo dated 29-03-2003. Thereafter, the petitioner was granted promotion to Draftsmen Category-I with effect from 01-10-1997 and his pay scale was revised to Rs.5,000-8,000 vide letter dated 23-08-2005. Then, he was granted the benefit of Sixth Pay Revision Committee, in the pay scale of Rs. 9,300-34,800 plus Grade Pay Rs. 4200 vide statement of fixation dated 19-03-2009.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, suddenly vide letter dated 17-11-2016, the Chief Engineer informed the Executive Engineer that the petitioner was granted Grade Pay Rs. 4200, wrongly as he did not have the Diploma in Engineering, and as such he would be entitled to Grade pay of Rs. 2800 with effect from 01-01-1996. Likewise, the pay scale of Rs. 5,000-8,000 was reduced to Rs. 4,000-6,000 as the petitioner did not have the Diploma in Engineering. The petitioner stated that on the same day, another letter dated 02-12-2016 was issued, by which it was informed that the petitioner&#8217;s pay scale was fixed as Rs.5200-20200 and Grade Pay of Rs.2800 with effect from 01-01-2006 which was also wrong, illegal and arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that from the perusal of the records, it appeared that during the entire service period, nothing adverse was found against the petitioner and when he was about to retire, then suddenly, the respondent issued a letter dated 17-11-2016, informing that the petitioner had been wrongly granted the grade pay of Rs. 4200. Thus, it was clear that the steps for recovery for the excess payment from the salary and upcoming retiral dues of the petitioner were being taken on almost fag end of his service.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that there was no misrepresentation or suppression on the petitioner&#8217;s part to get the said pay scale and it was only due to lapses on the part of the authorities of the State Government this situation arose. Further, during the period when petitioner was given promotion, there was neither misrepresentation nor any suppression of fact, as the service book of the petitioner was available with the respondent authorities at the time of granting all such scale.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner agreed to pay the due amount of Rs. 6,28,557 in instalments on 30-12-2016 itself, i.e. just ten months before his retirement on 31-10-2019. However, this undertaking given on behalf of the petitioner was completely under coercion and threat. The Court stated that it was well settled that the employer stands on higher pedestal in comparison to an employee and the representation given by the petitioner to recover the dues amount of Rs. 6,28,557 in instalments was clearly under coercion and threat for non-fixation of pension and other retiral benefits and it was against the public policy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that recovery of excess amount from the employee was not permissible, if there was no misrepresentation or suppression by the petitioner. It would be extremely iniquitous and arbitrary to seek refund of the payments mistakenly made to the employee. In the present case, there was neither any suppression nor misrepresentation on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, considering the mistakes committed by the department, excess payment was made to the petitioner and which could not be permitted to be recovered at this stage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court set aside the impugned letters dated 17-11-2016 and 02-12-2016 issued by the respondent authorities. Further, the respondents were directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner and the department was further directed to release the amount recovered from the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Binod Kumar Chandra v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/csv9Yc7T\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Jhar 2139<\/a>, decided on 02-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Pankaj Kumar, Advocate; Pranav Prakash Mishra, Advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Apurva Singh, A.C to S.C(Mines); Amit Kumar Verma, Advocate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court stated that recovery of excess amount from the employee was not permissible, if there was no misrepresentation or suppression by the petitioner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":317614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35128,70709,30651,5791,31483,12791,31196,70708,47208],"class_list":["post-326061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-coercion","tag-diploma-in-engineering","tag-employee","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-misrepresentation","tag-pay-scale","tag-public-policy","tag-recover-excess-amount","tag-suppression-of-facts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court set aside the impugned letters issued by the respondent authorities and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court set aside the impugned letters issued by the respondent authorities and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-17T09:10:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/\",\"name\":\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-08T11:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-17T09:10:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court set aside the impugned letters issued by the respondent authorities and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering | SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court set aside the impugned letters issued by the respondent authorities and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court set aside the impugned letters issued by the respondent authorities and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-08T11:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-17T09:10:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/","name":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-08T11:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-17T09:10:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court set aside the impugned letters issued by the respondent authorities and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200 to the petitioner.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/jharkhand-hc-sets-aside-orders-reducing-pay-scale-of-an-employee-as-he-did-not-have-required-diploma\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders reducing pay scale of an employee for requirement of Diploma in Engineering"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/no-recovery-can-be-done-from-the-retiral-benefits-without-conforming-to-the-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":326061,"position":0},"title":"No recovery can be done from the retiral benefits without conforming to the principles of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr S.N. Pathak, J., partly allowed a writ petition filed against the order of the respondent authorities, whereby the authorities recovered the Academic Grade Pay (AGP) granted to the petitioner behind his back on the ground that only promoted employees are entitled\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/jhc-retirement-benefits-is-constitutional-and-fundamental-right-of-employee-with-no-legal-impediment-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":326061,"position":1},"title":"Retirement benefits a Constitutional and fundamental right of an employee with no legal impediment: Jharkhand High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"June 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the respondent took filmsy stand which was not acceptable and this was another glaring example of delay and laches on the respondents\u2019 part for not extending the retirement benefits.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/02\/retrospective-re-fixation-salary-pensionary-benefits-post-retirement-not-accordance-law-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":326061,"position":2},"title":"Retrospective re-fixation of salary and pensionary benefits post-retirement is not in accordance with law: Madras HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner was retired from service by superannuation and hence, the employer - employee relationship between the petitioner and the University had come to an end and hence, the University holds no Authority to re-fix the salary and the consequential benefits of the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217429,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/29\/jhar-hc-past-service-of-the-petitioner-shall-be-taken-into-consideration-for-calculating-his-retiral-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":326061,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | Past service of the petitioner shall be taken into consideration for calculating his retiral benefits\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi J., allowed the petition and held that past service of the petitioner shall be taken into consideration for calculating his retiral benefits. The factual matrix of the instant petition that in the year 1981, an advertisement was published by the Principal, Bokaro Steel City\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":338253,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/01\/orissa-hc-upholds-cancellation-candidature-for-junior-overman-post-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":326061,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Suppression of criminal antecedents &amp; failure to disclose pending FIRs has significant consequences\u2019: Orissa HC upholds cancellation of candidature for Junior Overman post","author":"Editor","date":"January 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe role of a writ court to interfere with the discretionary power of the appointing authority is necessarily limited. This discretion, however, must be exercised judiciously, with due regard to the principles of fairness, proportionality, and the objectives of public service. The authority retains the prerogative to evaluate a candidate\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":104871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","url_meta":{"origin":326061,"position":5},"title":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed","author":"Saba","date":"February 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which the respondent authorities had deducted an amount of Rs. 29,447 on account of alleged overdrawal, the Bench of Arijit Banerjee, J., held that pensionary benefits are paid to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326061"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326061\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=326061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=326061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}