{"id":325931,"date":"2024-07-06T16:30:45","date_gmt":"2024-07-06T11:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325931"},"modified":"2024-07-10T11:32:39","modified_gmt":"2024-07-10T06:02:39","slug":"delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) seeking quashing of the First Information Report (&#8216;FIR&#8217;) registered at Police station of Mehrauli, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">377<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">509<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561713\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">380<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), a Single Judge Bench of Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. held that this case did not merit the quashing of the FIR but necessitated a trial to determine whether the complainant had made a false case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant (respondent 2), a single mother, had met petitioner 1 on a social media website where he had introduced himself as a divorced man who lived with his uncle. It was alleged that petitioner 1 started visiting the complainant frequently and even attended her son&#8217;s birthday party.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, it was alleged that one day when the complainant&#8217;s son was not at home, petitioner 1, being aware of this, visited her residence under the influence of alcohol and also brought half a bottle of alcohol and a bottle of breezer which was being consumed by the complainant when petitioner 1 began touching her inappropriately after which she asked him to leave and return another day but he persisted on staying.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was alleged that petitioner 1 had spiked her drink which caused her to lose consciousness and as a result, he had sexually assaulted her four times. After this incident, petitioner 1 professed his love for her, promised to marry her, apologized for his conduct, and assured her that he would not engage in sexual relations with her again without her consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant alleged that petitioner 1 had taken some intimate pictures of her and kept on assaulting her on the pretext of marriage. On the festival of Karwachauth, petitioner 1 made the complainant meet his mother, and on the same day, both of them had beaten the complainant since she refused to give them money.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was alleged that the complainant had given Rs. 12 lakhs to petitioner 1 and she was subsequently informed that he was already married. Upon confrontation, the complainant found that petitioner 1 was not divorced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, it was alleged that she married petitioner 1 on 07-07-2019 and had disclosed this fact to the brother of petitioner 1 who had also not told her that he was married. Thereafter, petitioner 1 kept visiting the complainant&#8217;s house regularly and used to commit sexual violence on false pretexts and by threatening the complainant to kill her son.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After petitioner 1 had committed theft of Rs. 2,20,000\/- from the almirah of the complainant, the present FIR was registered by the police upon complaint of the complainant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner 1 submitted that he had amicably settled the matter vide MoU dated 06-04-2024 executed with the complainant. It was also stated that as per the MoU, the complainant had agreed to settle her claims for Rs. 1.5 lakhs even though the total claim was 12 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The issue before the Court was whether FIR registered for an offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC could be quashed as a matter of right based on a compromise reached between the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court considered various legal precedents laid down by the Supreme Court and observed that the present case revealed continuous incidents of extreme sexual violence. The Court noted that the FIR alleged not only sexual violence but also the creation of inappropriate videos and photos of their relationship as well as threats to kill the complainant and her son.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that despite serious allegations of extreme sexual violence and threats, the complainant stated that the present FIR was a result of anger and also explained that following the intervention by their families, she wished to have the FIR quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the FIR revealed serious allegations against petitioner 1 and his family members and that the MoU entered into by the parties was not the result of a resolution of misunderstandings through family intervention, but an exchange of money intended to secure the quashing of the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court opined that criminal cases involving allegations of sexual violence could not be quashed based on monetary payments, since doing so would imply that justice is for sale. The Court also noted that there was no evidence produced before the Court that showed that Rs. 12 lakhs were actually paid to the complainant and no such payment was contended before the Court beyond a reference to some monetary transactions in the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it faced a situation where petitioner 1 sought to pay Rs. 12 lakhs and the complainant sought to accept it in furtherance of quashing an FIR that was filled with grave allegations of sexual violence and threats. The Court concluded that, in such circumstances, the case did not fall within the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for quashing of FIR since the offence under Section 376 was a serious crime against society at large.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that if the complainant had made false allegations, she must face the consequences for the same. Therefore, the Court held that this case did not merit the quashing of the FIR but did necessitate a trial to determine whether the complainant lodged a false complaint with the police against petitioner 1 and now sought to settle by accepting Rs. 1.5 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that neither of the parties could be allowed to manipulate the criminal justice system or misuse State and judicial resources to serve their own ends and that even if the parties had reached a compromise, they could not demand the quashing of the FIR as a matter of right.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While dismissing the petition, the Court directed the Trial Court to decide the case on merits and to examine the facts in light of natural justice for both parties, as well as considering the broader implications for the community as well as the criminal justice system.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rakesh Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/53TkqHW0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 4478<\/a>, Decided on 01-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioners &#8212;<\/span> Advocate Shasak Jain<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents &#8212;<\/span> APP Naresh Kumar Chahar, Advocate Jasir Aftab, Advocate Md. Hedayatullah<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Delhi High Court opined that true justice, and the ends of justice would not be served by quashing the FIR without a trial, but by conducting a trial to fairly ascertain the real culprit, whether it be the accused or the complainant.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11941,2543,3067,13961,68485,70653,2665,21664,60678,47080],"class_list":["post-325931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-crpc","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-FIR","tag-ipc","tag-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma","tag-monetary-settlement","tag-MoU","tag-quashing","tag-s-376","tag-sexual-violence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence after monetary settlement between parties | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence and says quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence and says quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-06T11:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-10T06:02:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence after monetary settlement between parties | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-06T11:00:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-10T06:02:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence and says quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence after monetary settlement between parties | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence and says quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence","og_description":"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence and says quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-06T11:00:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-10T06:02:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/","name":"Delhi HC refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence after monetary settlement between parties | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-06T11:00:45+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-10T06:02:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence and says quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-quash-fir-filed-for-sexual-violence-after-monetary-settlement-between-parties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Quashing of cases involving sexual violence based on monetary payments would imply that justice is for sale\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR filed for sexual violence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":316577,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-high-court-rejects-quashing-fir-despite-settlement-to-ensure-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325931,"position":0},"title":"Rape matters cannot be resolved through money or out of court settlements; Delhi High Court rejects quashing of rape FIR despite settlement","author":"Arunima","date":"March 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018Money, it seems, is to be exchanged for getting a quietus to the present criminal proceedings for offence of rape\u2014a proposition that is not only immoral but also strikes at the very core of our criminal justice system.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335970,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325931,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping &amp; POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement","author":"Arunima","date":"November 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In cases involving Section 376 IPC or the POCSO Act, Courts must exercise caution while quashing FIRs, as these offences impact societal interests. However, Delhi High Court acknowledged the unique circumstances where the petitioner and the prosecutrix, now married with children, had reached a settlement, balancing societal concerns with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-based-settlement-section376-section363-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325931,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR in Rape, Kidnapping, and POCSO case based on Settlement without imposing costs","author":"Arunima","date":"August 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered under Sections 376 (rape), 363 (kidnapping), and 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative assault). The decision was based on an amicable settlement between the parties, with no costs imposed on either side. This case underscores the court's recognition of mutually agreed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/03\/delhi-hc-stigma-of-rape-should-not-be-on-victim-but-the-perpetrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":325931,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Stigma of rape should not be on the victim but the perpetrator\u2019; Delhi HC refuses to quash FIR in POCSO case; Imposes Rs 10,000 as costs","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere has to be paradigm shift in societal mindset by attaching stigma to the accused and not to the girl who underwent the horrid suffering by way of rape.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Stigma of rape should not be on victim","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Stigma-of-rape-should-not-be-on-victim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Stigma-of-rape-should-not-be-on-victim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Stigma-of-rape-should-not-be-on-victim.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Stigma-of-rape-should-not-be-on-victim.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309317,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/14\/hp-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-offence-under-pocso-to-preserve-peaceful-married-life-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325931,"position":4},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court quashes FIR against man accused of offence under POCSO to preserve happy, peaceful married life of accused and victim","author":"Editor","date":"December 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThough justice has got to be administered in accordance with the law enacted by the Legislature. The concept of justice is elastic and is imperceptible. There can be no hard and fast line constricting the power of the High Courts to do substantial justice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312936,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/03\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-pocso-accused-considering-his-happy-married-life-with-victim-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325931,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Court cannot turn its back on distressed family\u2019: Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused under POCSO after considering his happy married life with victim","author":"Arushi","date":"February 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner\u2019s prosecution and conviction will lead to pain and tears in the eyes of the family members and future of two families will be at stake, whereas, if the impugned FIR is quashed, it would serve the ends of justice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325931\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}