{"id":325815,"date":"2024-07-05T16:00:43","date_gmt":"2024-07-05T10:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325815"},"modified":"2024-07-31T14:55:40","modified_gmt":"2024-07-31T09:25:40","slug":"jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by the petitioner-accused under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019) to quash the order dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur (\u2018Judicial Magistrate\u2019), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.<\/span>, opined that without any observation or satisfaction by the Judicial Magistrate that the petitioner was evading his arrest, the warrant of arrest was issued. Accordingly, the Court quashed and set aside the order dated 28-03-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that the Judicial Magistrate had not fixed any time or place for appearance of the petitioner who was the accused person of this case. Therefore, the Court held that the Judicial Magistrate had committed illegality by issuing the proclamation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519836\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">82<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, without complying with the mandatory requirements of the law. Hence, the same was not sustainable in law and the continuation of the same would amount to abuse of process of law. Thus, the Court quashed and set aside the order dated 03-05-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 28-03-2024, a petition was filed by the Investigating Officer, praying for issue of warrant of arrest against the petitioner. On perusal of records, the Judicial Magistrate allowed the prayer. Further, on 03-05-2024, the Judicial Magistrate took up the application filed by the Investigating Officer of the case for issuance of the proclamation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519836\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">82<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. The Judicial Magistrate concluded that that the accused was deliberately absconding and not taking any proper legal steps and issued the proclamation without fixing any time and place for appearance of the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioner filed the present petition challenging the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024. The petitioner submitted that the Judicial Magistrate had passed the order in a mechanical manner and had issued non-bailable warrant of arrest against him without recording any satisfaction that he was evading his arrest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that though it was not specifically mentioned in the order dated 28-03-2024, that the petitioner was accused of having committed any non-bailable offence, but the perusal of the record revealed that the petitioner was involved in commission of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. Further, the Court stated that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> was a non-bailable offence, but there was no observation by the Judicial Magistrate that the petitioner was evading arrest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that without any observation or satisfaction by the Judicial Magistrate that the petitioner was evading his arrest, the warrant of arrest was issued. Moreover, apparently the relevant order sheet was written by someone else and the Judicial Magistrate concerned had just put his signature mechanically without application of mind, which was not sustainable in law. Accordingly, the Court quashed and set aside the order dated 28-03-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding order dated 03-05-2024, the Court stated that it was settled principle of law that the court issuing the proclamation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519836\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">82<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> must record its satisfaction that the accused in respect of whom the proclamation was made, was absconding or concealing himself to evade his arrest and in case, the Court decided to issue proclamation, it must mention the time and place for appearance of the petitioner in the order itself. The Judicial Magistrate had not fixed any time or place for appearance of the petitioner who was the accused person of this case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court held that the Judicial Magistrate had committed illegality by issuing the proclamation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519836\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">82<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, without complying with the mandatory requirements of the law. Hence, the same was not sustainable in law and the continuation of the same would amount to abuse of process of law. Thus, the Court quashed and set aside the Order dated 03-05-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the Registrar General of this Court to send a copy of this Order to the Principal District Judge, Jamshedpur with a direction to impress upon the Judicial Magistrate concerned, not to pass orders in such reckless manner, without application of mind and unnecessarily enhance the burden upon this Court. Further, if necessary, recommend the training of the Judicial Officer concerned on the Sundays and Holidays in Judicial Academy, Jharkhand, in online mode.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Abhishek Kumar v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1QUw8J2F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Jhar 2032<\/a>, Order dated 19-06-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Devesh Ajmani, Advocate;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondent: Satish Prasad, Addl. P.P.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court directed the Registrar General of this Court to send a copy of this Order to the Principal District Judge, Jamshedpur with a direction to impress upon the Judicial Magistrate concerned, not to pass orders in such reckless manner, without application of mind and unnecessarily enhance the burden upon this Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":317614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31236,14411,49853,5791,33037,70598,67472],"class_list":["post-325815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-process","tag-application-of-mind","tag-criminal-procedure-code-1973","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-judicial-magistrate","tag-mandatory-requirements-of-law","tag-section-82-of-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law |SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court quashed and set aside the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court quashed and set aside the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-05T10:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-31T09:25:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/\",\"name\":\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law |SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-05T10:30:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-31T09:25:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court quashed and set aside the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law |SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court quashed and set aside the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court quashed and set aside the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-05T10:30:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-31T09:25:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/","name":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law |SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-05T10:30:43+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-31T09:25:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court quashed and set aside the orders dated 28-03-2024 and 03-05-2024, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/jhc-sets-aside-orders-passed-without-application-of-mind-and-complying-with-mandatory-requirements-of-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jharkhand HC sets aside orders passed without application of mind and complying with mandatory requirements of law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":257143,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/16\/bom-hc-discusses-law-where-accused-already-granted-bail-but-further-non-bailable-offences-are-added-by-prosecution\/","url_meta":{"origin":325815,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC discusses law where accused already granted bail but further non-bailable offences are added by prosecution. Read decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J., reiterated the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Pradip Ram v. State of Jharkhand, (2019) 17 SCC 326 wherein it was held: \u201cwhere the accused is bailed out under orders of the Court and new offences are added\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/22\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-transit-remand-order-directs-adjudication-of-application-under-section-437-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":325815,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside transit remand order; Directs adjudication of application u\/S 437 CrPC","author":"Arunima","date":"June 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court noted that the Duty Magistrate has the power to decide the application under Section 437 CrPC","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/06\/principle-against-double-jeopardy\/","url_meta":{"origin":325815,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Do principles laid under S. 300 CrPC and principle of double jeopardy under Art. 20(2) of Constitution differ? Explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Manish Pitale, J., while setting aside an impugned order explained the slight difference between principles laid down under Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from the principle of double jeopardy under Article 20 (2) of the Constitution of India. Petitioner invoked the principles of nemo\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/20\/dhc-chief-judicial-magistrate-cannot-transfer-case-from-one-court-or-another-on-application-or-suo-motu\/","url_meta":{"origin":325815,"position":3},"title":"Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate cannot transfer a case from one Court or another on application or suo motu under Section 450 BNSS: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"March 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate cannot exercise the administrative power of transfer of case from one Court to another within its jurisdiction, unless an order is passed by the High Court under Section 10(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/13\/person-taken-into-custody-by-an-order-of-the-magistrate-cannot-be-termed-as-illegal-and-be-challenged-by-writ-of-habeas-corpus-manipur-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":325815,"position":4},"title":"Magisterial custody cannot be challenged by a writ of Habeas Corpus: Manipur High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Manipur High Court held that where a person is taken into custody by an order of Magistrate, then such order cannot be challenged by Writ of Habeas Corpus as the detention cannot be termed as illegal.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Manipur High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-633.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-633.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-633.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-633.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":325815,"position":5},"title":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stressed the importance of ensuring that the complaint is not false, vexatious, or intended to harass the accused.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325815\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}