{"id":325694,"date":"2024-07-04T12:00:17","date_gmt":"2024-07-04T06:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325694"},"modified":"2024-07-09T18:00:51","modified_gmt":"2024-07-09T12:30:51","slug":"bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> Nine girl students (\u201cpetitioners\u201d) of the respondent College (\u201cCollege\u201d) challenged the dress code instructions issued by the College for all its students that restricted the donning of articles revealing anyone\u2019s religion, including <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">hijab<\/span> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">niqab<\/span> claiming them to be violative of the fundamental rights enshrined under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(a)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575050\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">A.S. Chandurkar*<\/span> and Rajesh S. Patil, JJ., held that the instructions were issued to maintain discipline and ensure that the students do not reveal their religious faith through their attire. The Court further pointed out that the petitioners did not present sufficient material to prove that donning a hijab or niqab is an essential practice in Islam, and that the fundamental right of establishing and administering an educational institution would prevail over the fundamental right of an individual, since the former is in the larger interest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioners challenged the instructions and notice issued by the College to all its students requiring them to follow the prescribed dress code. The petitioners alleged that the prescription of dress code restrained them from donning a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">hijab<\/span> or <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">niqab<\/span>, and therefore affected their fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(a)<\/a> and Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575050\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners also contended that the instructions were violative of the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2012 (\u201cRegulations\u201d), the Rashtriya Uchhastar Shiksha Abhiyan (\u201cRUSA\u201d), and the National Education Policy, 2020.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court\u2019s analysis and decision<\/p>\n<p>The Court referred to the following precedents and relevant decisions by other High Courts before reaching its decision-<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Fathema Hussain Sayed<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bharat Education Society<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EWj01876\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2002 SCC OnLine Bom 713<\/a>, wherein the directions of a high school to their student to not attend classes while wearing a headscarf were challenged; the instant Court held that merely asking a student to maintain the prescribed dress code could not be said to be a violation of the fundamental right of freedom of conscience and professing, propagating and practising the Islam faith.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Resham<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7Z2TmdCD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2002) 1 HCC (Kar) 43<\/a>, wherein a Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court had held that dress code prescription for all students was intended to treat them as a homogeneous class, serving the constitutional secularism, and that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">object of prescribing a uniform code would be defeated of there was non-uniformity in the matter of uniforms<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Fathima Thasneem<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Kerala<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0qi0EZ60\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2018 SCC OnLine Ker 5267<\/a>, wherein the Kerala High Court held that though there may be a fundamental right for a student to choose a dress, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">there is also a fundamental right of establishing, managing and administering an educational institution<\/span>. Between competing rights, an individual cannot seek the imposition of their fundamental right against the larger right of the educational institution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the light of the precedents, the Court in the instant petition noted that the dress code instructions must be treated as a discipline-maintaining exercise; the right to issue such instructions emanate from Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(g)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575063\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">26<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the insistence of the College to adhere to the prescribed dress code was within the college premises and petitioners\u2019 freedom of choice and expression was not otherwise affected, and that a changing room for girl students had been provided to facilitate them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted the reliance the petitioners sought for their case from the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2012, wherein a higher educational institution is prohibited to discriminate based on caste, creed, religion, language etc. The Court clarified that the impugned instructions were applicable to all students irrespective of their caste, creed, religion or language, and in fact seek to prevent the students from disclosing their religious affiliations through their dress. Other guidelines the petitioners attempted to cement their case upon, which direct for inclusivity, equity, sensitivity, gender sensitisation, access to education etc., were found unviolated by the impugned instructions of the College.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Whether donning a hijab\/niqab an essential religious practice?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also dealt with the alternate contention of the petitioners to ascertain whether the donning of a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">hijab<\/span> or <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">niqab<\/span> are an essential practice of the Islam faith. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Commissioner of Police<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Acharya J. Avadhuta<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/57Y8e5b7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2004) 12 SCC 770<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court defined &#8216;essential practice&#8217; as those practices that are fundamental to follow a religious belief, without which the fundamental nature of the religion would be changed. It is only such permanent, essential practices that are protected by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that except for stating that the donning of a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">hijab<\/span> or <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">niqab<\/span> are essential religious practices, on the basis of the English translations of the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kanz-ul-Iman<\/span> and the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Suman Abu Dawud<\/span>, there was no other material placed on record to substantiate their claim by the petitioners, and therefore this contention failed before the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court therefore held that the College\u2019s instructions prescribing the dress code for its students did not suffer from any infirmity and was not violative of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. The Court added that the object of the dress code prescription is to not reveal the religion of a student, which is a step towards ensuring their focus on gaining knowledge and education, that is in their larger interest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Zainab Abdul Qayyum Choudhary v. Chembur Trombay Education Society\u2019s N.G. Acharya and D.K. Marathe College of Art, Science and Commerce, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/YVV7nOgt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1925<\/a>, decided on 26-06-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice A.S. Chandurkar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> Altaf Khan, Akash Mangalgi, Shamsher Shaikh, Nilofar Sayyed, Gulfam Khan, Supriya Ghadge and Roohita Shaikh, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Anil V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate; Harshavardhan Suryavanshi, V. Mannadiar, Dhannya Prasad, Yuvraj Narvankar, Mayur Mohite, Advocates; P.H. Kantharia, GP; Jyoti Chavan; Addl. G.P.; Pooja Patil, AGP; Devang Vyas, ASG; Savita Ganoo, D.P. Singh, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court referred to Fathima Thasneem v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0qi0EZ60\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2018 SCC OnLine Ker 5267<\/a>, wherein it was held that there may be a fundamental right for a student to choose a dress but there is also a fundamental right of establishing, managing and administering an educational institution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[70527,2569,70530,70529,70528,3268,36126,48614,70526],"class_list":["post-325694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-19-and-25-of-the-constitution","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-chembur-trombay-education-society","tag-college-prescribed-dress-code","tag-essential-religious-practice","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-hijab","tag-hijab-ban","tag-niqab"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights; not essential religious practice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights; not essential religious practice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-04T06:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-09T12:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-04T06:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-09T12:30:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":989,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 19 and 25 of the Constitution\",\"Bombay High Court\",\"Chembur Trombay Education Society\",\"college prescribed dress code\",\"essential religious practice\",\"Fundamental Rights\",\"Hijab\",\"Hijab Ban\",\"niqab\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-04T06:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-09T12:30:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights; not essential religious practice\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/04\\\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights","description":"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights; not essential religious practice","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC","og_description":"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights; not essential religious practice","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-04T06:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-09T12:30:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC","datePublished":"2024-07-04T06:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-09T12:30:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/"},"wordCount":989,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","keywords":["Article 19 and 25 of the Constitution","Bombay High Court","Chembur Trombay Education Society","college prescribed dress code","essential religious practice","Fundamental Rights","Hijab","Hijab Ban","niqab"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/","name":"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-04T06:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-09T12:30:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay HC holds dress code restricting the donning of hijab and niqab non-violative of Fundamental Rights; not essential religious practice","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325694"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325694\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}