{"id":325584,"date":"2024-07-02T18:30:35","date_gmt":"2024-07-02T13:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325584"},"modified":"2024-07-10T17:36:38","modified_gmt":"2024-07-10T12:06:38","slug":"delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a matter of two bail applications filed by Kalvakuntla Kavitha in cases registered against her by the Directorate of Enforcement (&#8216;ED&#8217;) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (&#8216;CBI&#8217;) arising out of similar facts, a Single Judge Bench of Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. denied bail to K. Kavitha and held that no case could be made out for the grant of a regular bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The CBI had registered a case on 17-08-2022 for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> read with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561821\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">477-A<\/a> of the Indian <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001564458\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825997\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988<\/a> (&#8216;PC Act&#8217;) on the premise that during the formulation of the Delhi&#8217;s Excise Policy of 2021-22, K. Kavitha had entered into a criminal conspiracy, thereby intentionally creating or leaving loopholes in the policy to be exploited later on.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was claimed that kickbacks totaling around Rs. 90-100 crores were paid in advance to Vijay Nair, Manish Sisodia, and other co-accused persons by individuals in the South Indian liquor business (&#8216;South group&#8217;). The criminal conspiracy allegedly resulted in the formation of a cartel among three components of the policy: Liquor manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After the filing of charge sheets, the CBI conducted further investigation and on 20-02-2024, issued a notice to K. Kavitha under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519712\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">41-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) for joining the investigation but because she did not do so, she could not be examined by CBI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, K. Kavitha was arrested by the ED on 15-03-2024 after which the CBI sought permission from the Trial Court to interrogate her as she was in judicial custody. The investigation by CBI revealed that K. Kavitha was a partner in Indo Spirits through her proxy i.e., co-accused Arun Ramchandran Pillai.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">K. Kavitha was arrested by the CBI on 11-04-2024 for her active involvement in the Delhi liquor policy case and was then remanded to the custody of CBI by the Trial Court vide order dated 12-04-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">ED alleged that the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 was crafted by top leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (&#8216;AAP&#8217;) to continuously generate and channel illegal funds to themselves, with deliberate loopholes left in the policy to facilitate criminal activities. It was also alleged that Vijay Nair was appointed as a mediator by leaders of AAP and he proposed to K. Kavitha as well as other members of the South group to fund the party in exchange for profitable business opportunities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As alleged, Rs. 100 crores were received as advance kickbacks from the South group which led to the formation of a special-purpose vehicle i.e. Indo Spirits where K. Kavitha and Raghav Magunta, through proxies, held a 65 percent partnership. ED alleged that Indo Spirits was used to launder money by employing various methods.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">K. Kavitha argued that there had been a grave violation of Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">22(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> as well as the principles of natural justice in her case. It was also argued that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519796\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">50<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> had not been complied with by the investigating agency since no information regarding the arrest was given to her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">K. Kavitha also contended that she was the only woman accused in the present case and that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534467\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">45<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> (&#8216;PMLA&#8217;) states that the case of a woman accused is to be treated on a different footing and that she could be enlarged on bail without having to satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45(1).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that during the investigation, Magunta S. Reddy revealed that the Chief Minister of Delhi, Arvind Kejriwal, had informed him that K. Kavitha met him earlier and offered to pay Rs. 100 crores to AAP for doing liquor business in Delhi and also informed him that K. Kavitha would follow up regarding the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court noted that K. Kavitha had arranged a meeting with Magunta S. Reddy at her Hyderabad residence after which payments were made in furtherance of the arrangement and this resulted in Magunta S. Reddy&#8217;s son Raghav Magunta acquiring a 32.5 percent partnership in Indo Spirits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that evidence in the form of chats retrieved from the phone of K. Kavitha&#8217;s chartered accountant revealed her partnership in Indo Spirits. The investigation also revealed that Sarath Chandra Reddy&#8217;s participation in Delhi&#8217;s liquor business under the new Excise Policy was influenced by K. Kavitha&#8217;s assurances. The Court also noted that in the bidding for retail zones, a total amount of Rs. 14 crores were paid to K. Kavitha under a sham land deal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court opined that, given the material collected by the investigating agency, K. Kavitha was <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> one of the main conspirators in the criminal conspiracy hatched for the formulation and implementation of the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court noted that Sarath Reddy had disclosed that Arun Pillai had informed him about a lucrative opportunity in the Delhi liquor business and that K. Kavitha was discussing the upcoming Excise Policy with Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia who told her that if she gives Rs. 100 crores, the policy would be amended in her favour. In furtherance of this, Sarath Reddy had agreed to contribute a part of the amount, once the business began.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that it was important to note that Indo Spirits was a vehicle that was created to recoup the advance kickbacks paid by the South group, and it had earned profits of Rs. 193 crores within 10 months, which was termed as proceeds of crime by the ED.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court opined that, given the material collected by ED, K. Kavitha was <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> involved in the payment of kickbacks, establishing Indo Spirits for recoupment of kickbacks, and in various other processes and activities relating to proceeds of crime.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the argument that the statements of the approvers recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">164<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and other statements under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534473\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">50<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PMLA<\/a> could not be relied on, was devoid of merit since, in a criminal trial, at the stage of arrest and remand of an accused, only the statements of the witnesses and the material collected which corroborates with such statements are placed before the Court of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rohit Tandon<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Directorate of Enforcement<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/11k579gb\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2018) 11 SCC 46<\/a> to state that the statements recorded under Section 50 of PMLA had been held to be admissible and these statements could make out a formidable case about the involvement of the accused in the offence of money laundering.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that as per the existing law, the Courts have to rely upon the statements of the witnesses, etc. to make out a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> view regarding the involvement of an accused and the extent thereof to exercise discretion to grant or deny bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court mentioned the twin test as has been provided in Section 45 of PMLA and concluded that the twin conditions were not fulfilled since a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> case of commission of money laundering was made out against K. Kavitha. Hence, she was not entitled to the grant of bail in the case registered by ED.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that K. Kavitha had presented nine mobile phones which were found to be formatted. When she was questioned as to who had deleted the data, she was evasive and could not provide any explanation. The Court also found it crucial to note that the forensic examination of the phones revealed that they had been formatted after K. Kavitha had been summoned on 11-03-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court said that it could not rule out the possibility of K. Kavitha tampering with evidence if she is released on bail since the investigation had not been concluded and thus, the Court opined that the applicant did not fulfill the triple test for the grant of bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also held that K. Kavitha could not be equated to a vulnerable woman who may have been misused to commit an offence, which is the class of women for whom the proviso to Section 45 of PMLA had been incorporated as per <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Saumya Chaurasia<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Directorate of Enforcement<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/416HYiH5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1674<\/a>, and she was not entitled to the benefit of the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">proviso<\/span> to Section 45 of PMLA.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Lastly, the Court held that no case for regular bail was made out at the present stage and accordingly dismissed the applications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kalvakuntla Kavitha v. CBI, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d91UL6D3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 4459<\/a>, Decided on 01-07-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner &#8212;<\/span> Sr. Advocate Vikram Chaudhari, Advocate Nitesh Rana, Advocate Mohith Rao, Advocate Deepak Nagar, Advocate Arveen, Advocate Muskan Khurana, Advocate Shaik Sohil Akhtar<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent &#8212;<\/span> SPP D.P. Singh, Advocate Manu Mishra, Advocate Shreya Dutt, Advocate Imaan Khera, SC Zoheb Hossain, Advocate Vivek Gurnani, Advocate Vivek Gaurav, Advocate Kartik Sabharwal, Advocate Abhipriya Rai, Advocate Sachin Sharma, Advocate Samarvir, Advocate Radhika Puri, Advocate Dipanshu Gaba<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1170\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1170\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"prevention of corruption act, 1988\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-295972\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988-60x40.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/prevention-of-corruption-act-1988.jpg 886w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Delhi High Court stated that a prima facie case of money laundering under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was made against K. Kavitha based on the material placed on record.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,11941,2543,38392,13961,68485,66686,66439,19261,34084],"class_list":["post-325584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-crpc","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-excise-policy","tag-ipc","tag-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma","tag-k-kavitha","tag-liquor-policy-scam","tag-money-laundering","tag-pmla"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-02T13:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-10T12:06:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-02T13:00:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-10T12:06:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam","og_description":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-02T13:00:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-10T12:06:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-02T13:00:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-10T12:06:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-to-k-kavitha-in-cases-related-to-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court denies bail to K. Kavitha in cases related to Delhi Liquor Policy scam"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329442,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/27\/supreme-court-grants-bail-to-k-kavitha-delhi-excise-liquor-policy-scam\/","url_meta":{"origin":325584,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court grants bail to K. Kavitha in Delhi Excise Liquor Policy Scam","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The CBI and the ED have claimed that K. Kavitha was involved in the exchange of bribes and money laundering in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"K. Kavitha","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/K.-Kavitha.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/K.-Kavitha.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/K.-Kavitha.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/K.-Kavitha.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/25\/supreme-court-grants-bail-amandeep-singh-dhall-delhi-liquor-excise-policy-scam\/","url_meta":{"origin":325584,"position":1},"title":"[Delhi Liquor Excise Policy Scam] Supreme Court grants bail to businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall in CBI case","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"With this order, all the accused in the liquor policy case\u2014including AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, Sanjay Singh, and BRS leader K. Kavitha, have been granted bail.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi Liquor Excise Policy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Delhi-Liquor-Excise-Policy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Delhi-Liquor-Excise-Policy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Delhi-Liquor-Excise-Policy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Delhi-Liquor-Excise-Policy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/delhi-court-denies-interim-bail-to-brs-leader-k-kavitha-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325584,"position":2},"title":"[Excise Policy Case] Delhi Court denies plea of BRS leader K Kavitha seeking interim bail on ground of her son&#8217;s exam","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Enforcement Directorate has claimed that Kavitha is linked to a \u201cSouth Group\u201d lobby of liquor traders who were trying to play a larger role under the excise policy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rouse Avenue District Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318090,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-liquor-policy-sc-directs-k-kavitha-to-move-before-trial-court-for-bail-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325584,"position":3},"title":"Delhi Liquor Policy Scam: SC directs Bharat Rashtra Samithi\u2019s K Kavitha to move before Trial Court for bail","author":"Editor","date":"March 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"K Kavitha, MLC, Telangana Legislative Council, was arrested on 15-03-2024 by the ED.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SC directs K Kavitha to move before Trial Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/SC-directs-K-Kavitha-to-move-before-Trial-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/SC-directs-K-Kavitha-to-move-before-Trial-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/SC-directs-K-Kavitha-to-move-before-Trial-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/SC-directs-K-Kavitha-to-move-before-Trial-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/delhi-court-refuses-interim-bail-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal\/","url_meta":{"origin":325584,"position":4},"title":"[Liquor Excise Policy scam] Delhi Court refuses to grant interim bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal","author":"Editor","date":"June 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court had granted him interim bail till 01-06-2024 considering the 18th Lok Sabha General Elections and he had surrendered on 02-06-2024.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rouse Avenue District Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Rouse-Avenue-District-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328669,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/supreme-court-issues-notice-cbi-arvind-kejriwal-plea-bail-and-quashing-of-arrest\/","url_meta":{"origin":325584,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court issues notice to CBI on Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s bail plea","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was denied interim bail in CBI matter. The CBI arrested him on 26-06-2024, while he was in judicial custody in ED\u2019s matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arvind Kejriwal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/arvind-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/arvind-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/arvind-5.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/arvind-5.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}