{"id":325471,"date":"2024-07-01T17:00:59","date_gmt":"2024-07-01T11:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325471"},"modified":"2024-07-03T16:32:06","modified_gmt":"2024-07-03T11:02:06","slug":"relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> Petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of a case registered at Karad Taluka Police Station, Satara, for the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376(2)(n)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">377<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;). During pendency of the petition, a charge sheet was filed by the police officials on 26-09-2023 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge at Karad. Petitioner was given the liberty to amend the petition to challenge the proceedings which were now assailed. The Division Bench of A.S. Gadkari and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. Neela Gokhale<\/span>, JJ., opined that the relationship between petitioner and the complainant in respect of indulging in sexual activities was not consensual to justify quashing of the criminal complaint at the threshold. Thus, the Court dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent 2, the complainant submitted that she had obtained Khulanama from her husband as per the practices of Muslim Religion and she resided with her four-year-old son. In 2022, petitioner came to live on rent next door to the complainant and gradually petitioner declared his love for her and promised to marry her. He demanded that they should indulge in sexual relationship, however, the complainant consistently refused for the same. The complainant further submitted that in July 2022, petitioner came to her house and threatened her that, if she refused to marry him, he would commit suicide, but ignoring her resistance and consistent refusal, he forced her for sexual relationship and raped her. Thereafter, during celebration of petitioner&#8217;s birthday, he again forcibly raped her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant made a specific allegation that petitioner forced her to indulge in unnatural sex with him. Thereafter, petitioner distanced himself from the complainant and started avoiding her and when she asked his parents and relatives regarding their marriage, they abused her and told her that, she belonged to a different caste and hence, there was no question of marriage between the parties. The family members of petitioner then abused, and petitioner also joined his relatives in abusing the complainant and threatened to kill her and her son. Thus, the complainant lodged the impugned FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the FIR did indicate an intimate relationship between the parties. However, the complainant had clearly alleged that petitioner had established sexual intercourse forcibly with her and without her consent, despite a relationship. The Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one on his partner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that a relationship might be consensual at the beginning, but the same state might not remain so for all time to come. Whenever one of the partners show their unwillingness to indulge in a sexual relationship, the character of the relationship as &#8216;consensual&#8217; ceases to exist. The Court noted that the allegations in the present FIR did not demonstrate continuous consent on the part of the complainant. The allegations demonstrated that even though the complainant was desirous of being married to a petitioner, she was not inclined to indulge in a sexual relationship with him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the present case was not one of those cases where there was a bonafide intent on petitioner&#8217;s part to marry the complainant on the assurance of which the parties enjoyed intimate relationship but unfortunately the same did not fructify in a marital tie. The Court stated that in cases such as the present case, the Supreme Court distinguished between giving a false promise and committing breach of promise by the accused, i.e, in cases of false promise, the accused right from the beginning would not have any intention to marry the prosecrutrix and would have cheated and deceived her by giving a false promise to marry her only with a view to satisfy his lust, whereas, in case of breach of promise, one could not deny a possibility that the accused might have given a promise with all seriousness to marry her and subsequently might have encountered certain circumstances unforeseen by him or the circumstances beyond his control, which prevented him from fulfilling his promise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the allegation in the FIR <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> constitutes the commission of the alleged offence, and the defense of petitioner could not be tested at this stage. The Court dismissed the petition and opined that the relationship between petitioner and the complainant in respect of indulging in sexual activities was not consensual to justify quashing of the criminal complaint at the threshold.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ItHgyD73\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1943<\/a>, decided on 28-06-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Abhang Suryawanshi i\/b Narayan Rokade<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Anamika Malhotra, Addl. PP; Mahindra Deshmukh, Counsel<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">A relationship may be consensual at the beginning, but the same state may not remain so for all time to come. Whenever one of the partners show their unwillingness to indulge in a sexual relationship, the character of the relationship as &#8216;consensual&#8217; ceases to exist.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[70406,2569,70407,45836,2572,70405],"class_list":["post-325471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adult-individual","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-justify-sexual-assault","tag-partner","tag-Rape","tag-relationship"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one partner on another.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one partner on another.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-01T11:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-03T11:02:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/\",\"name\":\"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-01T11:30:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-03T11:02:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one partner on another.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay HC | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one partner on another.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court","og_description":"Bombay High Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one partner on another.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-01T11:30:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-03T11:02:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/","name":"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-01T11:30:59+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-03T11:02:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court opined that a relationship between two adult individuals did not justify sexual assault by one partner on another.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/relationship-between-two-adult-individuals-does-not-justify-sexual-on-partner-bomhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Relationship between two adult individuals does not justify sexual assault on partner: Bombay High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/04\/pocso-act-not-to-punish-minors-in-consensual-relationships-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325471,"position":0},"title":"POCSO Act not enacted to punish minors in romantic, consensual relationships: Bombay High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court allowed the instant application for bail while expressing concern that further detention of the applicant will bring him in the association of hardened criminals, which will be detrimental to his interest.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/bombay-hc-discharges-in-376-false-promise-of-marriage-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":325471,"position":1},"title":"Cases where relationship turns sour cannot be inferred that the physical relationship established on every occasion was against will; Bombay High Court discharges accused in false promise of marriage","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court commented that refusal to discharge the accused merely with an observation that intercourse was forcible at some time cannot be said to be a justified exercise of power.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/30\/bombay-high-court-friendship-with-the-person-of-fairer-sex-does-not-confer-a-licence-upon-a-man-to-force-himself-upon-her-anticipatory-bail-application-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":325471,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court | Friendship with the person of fairer sex, does not confer a licence upon a man to force himself upon her; Anticipatory bail application, rejected","author":"Editor","date":"June 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J. rejected an anticipatory bail application which was filed apprehending arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 376(2)(h) and 417 of the Penal Code, 1860. The complainant who is 22-year-old girl who was briefly acquainted with the applicant along with her friend had visited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297015,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/17\/love-affair-consensual-sex-minor-bombay-high-court-targets-pocso-act-age-limit\/","url_meta":{"origin":325471,"position":3},"title":"Consensual sex with minor| Bombay High Court acquits accused; suggests review of age of consent under POCSO Act","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court pointed out the personal interaction with the victim and her statements confirmed consensual relationship with the accused, but the rigors of POCSO Act did not permit quashing of proceedings because any kind of sexual indulgence with a minor fell within the ambit of Sections 4 and 6\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233860,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/bom-hc-no-prima-facie-case-of-forcible-sexual-act-man-accused-for-rape-set-free-on-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":325471,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | No prima facie case of forcible sexual act; Man accused for rape set free on bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Bharati Dangre, J., granted bail to an accused of rape in light of no prima facie case of non-consensual sexual indulgence. Applicant has been accused of an offence under Section 376(2)(N) of the Penal Code, 1860. On 20-03-2020, the applicant was incarcerated and a charge sheet was filed.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/bombay-hc-grants-bail-22-year-old-man-accused-raping-16-year-old-girlfriend-consensual-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":325471,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Not a sexual predator but a young person involved in consensual relationship\u2019; Bombay HC grants bail to 22-year-old man accused of raping his 16-year-old girlfriend","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBoth the parties were of the age to have a reasonable understanding of the import of their conduct, and despite that, had engaged in the said act over a substantial period of time.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325471\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}