{"id":325420,"date":"2024-07-01T13:00:43","date_gmt":"2024-07-01T07:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325420"},"modified":"2024-07-06T11:08:28","modified_gmt":"2024-07-06T05:38:28","slug":"can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the Glaxo Group (‘Glaxo’) (decree holders) for execution of a decree passed in a suit for infringement of trademark by the defendant, Jasmeet Singh, J, while restraining defendants from infringing upon Glaxo’s trade mark, held that the Court in an execution petition could arrive at a finding that the products of the judgment-debtors were similar and infringing the trademark of the decree-holders, in order to execute the decree of injunction, and can pass orders subsequently, so as to give effect to the decree.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Glaxo, a renowned name in the business of manufacturing pharmaceuticals, had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant for misappropriation of Glaxo’s registered trademarks. The defendants had been manufacturing pharmaceuticals in the name and style of “ETORIWIN”, “ARIBRIX”, “POLYRIX”, etc. as against products manufactured by Glaxo “OTRIVIN”, “AMBIRIX”, “POLIORIX”, etc., which are registered trademarks owned by Glaxo.<\/p>\n

A joint compromise application was filed wherein the defendants had undertaken that they had no unfinished products and any other products bearing the impugned marks or products with marks deceptively similar to that of Glaxo would be destroyed immediately.<\/p>\n

In view of the joint compromise application and prayers in the plaint, the suit was decreed in favour of Glaxo, therefore, Glaxo had filed the present execution petition seeking enforcement of the decree.<\/p>\n

Glaxo submitted before the Court that the defendants had been infringing their trademark ‘BETNESOL’ by using the mark ‘BETNEVIN’, which also bore resemblance to Glaxo’s packaging.<\/p>\n

Contentions of the Parties<\/p>\n

It was contended by the defendants that an Executing Court could not go beyond the terms of the decree, and that the moment the Court assesses the matter of infringement, it went beyond the domain of the Executing Court. The defendant further submitted that the issue of infringement should have been brought up in a new suit by Glaxo, and not before an Executing Court.<\/p>\n

Decision and Analysis<\/p>\n

Upon hearing the submissions of both the parties, the Court referred to Chittoori Subbanna<\/span> v. Kudappa Subbanna<\/span>, 1964 SCC OnLine SC 322<\/a> and Essco Sanitations<\/span> v. Mascot Industries (India)<\/span>, 1982 SCC OnLine Del 110<\/a> wherein it was observed that a Court, in an execution petition, could determine that the judgment-debtors’ products were similar and infringed upon the decree holders’ trademark to enforce the injunction decree and issue subsequent orders, and further that the Supreme Court had stated that it would not matter if the decree’s terms or directions were contrary to law, the Executing Court must enforce the decree without questioning it.<\/p>\n

The Court, therefore, restrained the defendants from using the mark ‘BETNEVIN’ and the product packaging to that of ‘BETNESOL’, observing that the product and packaging of the defendants was similar to that of Glaxo.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court disposed of the execution petition, granting liberty to Glaxo to revive in case of further infringement by the defendants.<\/p>\n

[Glaxo Group Limited v. Rajiv Mukul, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 4447<\/a>, decided on 08.05.2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Advocates for the Decree Holders:<\/span> Shwetasree Majumdar, Tanya Varma, Shilpi Sinha, Vardaan Anand, Advocates.<\/p>\n

Advocates for the Judgment Debtor:<\/span> Sidharth Bambha, Sucharu Garg, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“It is immaterial if the term or directions in a decree is contrary to law. The Executing Court cannot go behind the same, and has to give effect to the decree.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49675,70390,34851,2543,44760,49678,14211,18071],"class_list":["post-325420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-betnesol","tag-betnevin","tag-decree-holder","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-execution-petition","tag-glaxo","tag-judgment-debtor","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nCan the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court observed that in an execution petition, the Court can determine if the judgment-debtors' products infringe the decree-holders' trademark and pass subsequent orders to enforce the injunction.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court observed that in an execution petition, the Court can determine if the judgment-debtors' products infringe the decree-holders' trademark and pass subsequent orders to enforce the injunction.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-01T07:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-06T05:38:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-01T07:30:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-06T05:38:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court observed that in an execution petition, the Court can determine if the judgment-debtors' products infringe the decree-holders' trademark and pass subsequent orders to enforce the injunction.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court observed that in an execution petition, the Court can determine if the judgment-debtors' products infringe the decree-holders' trademark and pass subsequent orders to enforce the injunction.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers","og_description":"Delhi High Court observed that in an execution petition, the Court can determine if the judgment-debtors' products infringe the decree-holders' trademark and pass subsequent orders to enforce the injunction.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-01T07:30:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-06T05:38:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/","name":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-01T07:30:43+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-06T05:38:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court observed that in an execution petition, the Court can determine if the judgment-debtors' products infringe the decree-holders' trademark and pass subsequent orders to enforce the injunction.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/delhi-high-court-restrains-biogen-serums-from-using-product-using-betnol-marks-being-similar-to-glaxo-group-betnesol-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":325420,"position":0},"title":"[Betnesol v Betnol]: Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Glaxo Group Limited on failure to file written statement by Biogen Serums","author":"Arunima","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that the defendant has used the infringing mark \u2018BETNOL\u2019, which is identical to the plaintiff's mark \u2018BETNESOL\u2019 with the intent to springboard its business by drawing association with the plaintiff and its trademark to ride on the goodwill and reputation of the mark of the plaintiff.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372080,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/08\/delhi-hc-rejects-metas-claim-for-extra-damages-in-facebook-trade-mark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":325420,"position":1},"title":"‘No willful disobedience or non-compliance’: Delhi HC rejects Meta’s claim for additional damages in Facebake v. Facebook trade mark case","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"January 8, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere judgment debtors have substantially complied with a permanent injunction and no prior notice of breach was issued, execution proceedings cannot be used to seek additional compensation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Facebook trade mark case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/intellectual-property-rights-roundup-with-top-ip-cases-july-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":325420,"position":2},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights | A quick view of top Intellectual Property cases from July and August 2024","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick recap of top Intellectual Property cases on sale of counterfeit copies of EBC\u2019s books, Nizam\u2019s trade mark, Mankind v. Mercykind, Adidas, L\u2019Or\u00e9al, Electronica, and more.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298498,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-grants-injunction-to-glaxo-group-for-its-various-marks-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325420,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of Glaxo Group for its marks Betnovate-N, Betnovate-C, T-Bact, Cobadex, Zentel, Augmentin","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe comparison of the defendant's and the plaintiffs\u2019 marks will show that the defendant has not merely copied one mark or packaging but has deliberately adopted a series of marks, in packaging with almost identical colour combinations.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":325420,"position":4},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":266738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/trademark-infringement-of-starbucks-trademark-frappuccino\/","url_meta":{"origin":325420,"position":5},"title":"Infringement of Starbucks trademark FRAPPUCCINO | Del HC awards Rs 2 lakh in damages and 9 lakh costs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a matter wherein Starbucks trademark \u2018frappuccino\u2019 was being infringed, Jyoti Singh, J., while observing that, FRAPPUCCINO trademarks have acquired formidable reputation and goodwill in India, awarded Starbuck Rupees 2 lakhs damages and 9 lakh costs. Instant suit had been filed to seek a decree of permanent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325420\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}