{"id":325400,"date":"2024-07-01T11:00:41","date_gmt":"2024-07-01T05:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325400"},"modified":"2024-07-05T09:42:04","modified_gmt":"2024-07-05T04:12:04","slug":"mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> The Division Bench of Rahul Chaturvedi*, J. and Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi, J.<\/span> while dealing with similar appeals related to dowry deaths, addressed the issue of the application of Section 302<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a>, (‘IPC’) in dowry-related cases, as a result of the misuse of murder charges in cases primarily revolving around dowry harassment and deaths.<\/p>\n

The Court said that ideally the charges under Sections 498A and 304-B<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>, along with provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act, were designed to combat the menace of dowry-related violence, however, the blanket addition of murder charges had become a troubling trend in Trial Courts, often lacking the requisite evidence.<\/p>\n

In this regard the Court formulated the following issues:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the Trial Courts were justified in framing the charge under Sections 498-A<\/a>, 304B IPC<\/a> and Section 3 read with Section 4<\/a> of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a> (‘Dowry Prohibition Act’) with alternative charge under Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a> simpliciter or Section 302 read with Section 34<\/a> IPC<\/a>;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the Trial Courts were justified while exonerating the accused persons from the primary charges of Sections 498-A<\/a>, 304-B<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Section 3 read with Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, but convicting them under Section302 read with Section 34<\/a> IPC<\/a> taking recourse of Section 106 of the Evidence Act?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Court noted that Trial Courts had been applying this routinely and mechanically, escalating the seriousness of the situation without specific documentation or allegations, and said that this legal issue would have significant implications for pending trials in the Sessions Courts.<\/p>\n

    The accused in one of the cases before the Court contended that Trial Courts were misinterpreting legal precedents, particularly the judgment rendered in Rajbir<\/span> v. State of Haryana<\/span>, (2010) 15 SCC 116<\/a> which dealt with stringent actions against dowry-related crimes, saying further that the interpretation of this judgment often led to an almost automatic addition of Section 302 IPC in chargesheets, without careful consideration of the facts of each case.<\/p>\n

    However, the Court noted that the decision in Rajbir (Supra) did not advocate for a one-size-fits-all approach, and that subsequent clarifications, especially in Jasvinder Saini<\/span> v. State<\/span> (Govt. of NCT of Delhi<\/span>), (2013) 7 SCC 256<\/a>, reinforced that additional charges must have arisen from compelling evidence presented during trial proceedings, not as a default prosecutorial strategy.<\/p>\n

    The Court further noted how there was an over reliance by Trial Courts on Section 106 of the Evidence Act, a section which placed the burden of proof on the accused for facts within their knowledge, was frequently invoked in light of concrete evidence from the prosecution.<\/p>\n

    The Court said that this practice not only undermines the principle that the prosecution bears the burden of proof, but also led to scenarios where the accused were convicted of murder based on presumptive rather than cogent evidence.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that in the present scenario before the Trial Courts, the mere presence of dowry harassment allegations seemed to suffice for escalating charges to murder, disregarding the differences between various types of culpable homicide.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that repercussions of this misapplication were manifold, leading to numerous wrongful convictions where individuals were held guilty of murder in the absence of direct or circumstantial evidence substantiating such charges.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that the mechanical addition of Section 302 charges diluted the gravity of murder as an offense, as cases with insufficient evidence were treated on a par with those involving clear homicidal intent.<\/p>\n

    With regard to the issue of addition of offences under Section 304<\/a> IPC<\/a>, the Court noted that the offense under Section 304-B<\/a> IPC<\/a>, related to dowry death, is distinct from murder under Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a> and should not be considered a lesser offense, however, when a person is charged with both Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a> (murder) and Section 498-A<\/a> IPC<\/a> (cruelty to a woman), alleging harassment leading to dowry demands and the bride’s death within seven years of marriage, there may be cases where murder is not proven but all conditions for Section 304-B<\/a> IPC<\/a> are met.<\/p>\n

    Here the Court referred to the judgment in Shamnsaheb M. Multtani<\/span> v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, (2000) 3 SCC 698<\/a>, wherein it was held that if the Court found that murder under Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a> was not proven but the conditions for Section 304-B<\/a> IPC<\/a> were satisfied, it must allow the accused to defend against this charge, and that even if not initially charged under Section 304-B<\/a> IPC<\/a>, the Court can inform the accused of its view and proceed with conviction if the accused fails to disprove the presumption.<\/p>\n

    The Court referred to Vijay Pal Singh<\/span> v. State of Uttarakhand<\/span>, (2014) 15 SCC 163<\/a>, wherein it was held that in cases where there is evidence, either direct or circumstantial, indicating that the offense falls under Section 302 of IPC, the Trial Court should frame charges under Section 302, regardless of whether the police report under Section 173(2) of the CrPC expresses an opinion to that effect, and further Section 304-B<\/a> of IPC<\/a> may be included as an alternative charge at the discretion of the Trial Court.<\/p>\n

    The Court further said that during the trial, if the Court determined that there was insufficient direct or circumstantial evidence to establish the offense as homicide beyond reasonable doubt, but the elements of Section 304-B<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> were present, the Trial Court should proceed under that provision.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that the Trial Courts in all the cases had exonerated the accused persons from the charge under Section 304-B<\/a> IPC<\/a>, but with the help of Section 106 of Evidence Act convicted the accused persons in a most casual and cursory manner under Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    The Court further noted that the principle underlying Section 106 applies only to such matters of defence which are supposed to be especially within the knowledge of the defendant and cannot be applied when the fact is known also by a person other than the defendant.<\/p>\n

    The Court remarked, “the word “especially” means facts that are pre-eminently or exceptionally within the knowledge of the accused. The ordinary rule that applies to the criminal trials that the onus lies on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused is not in any way modified by the rule of facts embodied in Section 106 of the Evidence Act.<\/span>”<\/p>\n

    The Court, therefore, in all the appeals before it, quashed the convictions under Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a> and ordered retrials, explicitly mandating adherence to the guidelines set forth in Jasvinder Saini<\/span> (Supra) and Vijay Pal Singh<\/span> v. State of Uttarakhand<\/span>, (2014) 15 SCC 163<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    The Court emphasized the need for comprehensive investigations that thoroughly explore all charges—dowry death, abetment to suicide, and murder—only when supported by substantial evidence.<\/p>\n

    Additionally, the Court instituted some measures including the release of accused persons on bail, saying that re-trials should aim at rectifying injustices rather than perpetuating them. The Court also mandated that investigations be exhaustive, directing the Director General of Police to train officers in distinguishing between different legal provisions applicable in dowry death cases, thereby preventing the indiscriminate addition of severe charges without merit.<\/p>\n

    Lastly, the Court emphasized the need for timely retrials to alleviate the prolonged legal burdens on the accused, thus upholding the fundamental right to a fair and expeditious trial.<\/p>\n

    [Rammilan Bunker v. State of UP, 2024 SCC OnLine All 3140<\/a>, decided on 30-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    Judgment Authored by Justice Rahul Chaturvedi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Advocates for the Appellants:<\/span> Shiv Babu Dubey, S.P.S. Chauhan, Sukhendra Singh, Mohd Aamir A.C., Atharva Dixit, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Yadav, Dr. Arun Srivastav, Advocates<\/p>\n

    Advocates for the State:<\/span> AGA, GA, Arun Kumar Srivastava<\/p>\n

    Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

    \"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    “Addition of Section 302 IPC in addition to pre-existing sections about dowry death and dowry related inhuman treatment is being carried out by Trial Judges as a matter of routine and in a most mechanical fashion, making the entire episode more grim and serious, without having any supporting documents or allegations”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,2855,6691,3156,32174,30765,70378,7181],"class_list":["post-325400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-Dowry","tag-dowry-death","tag-murder","tag-section-106-evidence-act","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-section-302-ipc-in-dowry-deaths","tag-trial-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMechanical addition charges u\/s 302 IPC dowry cases dilutes severity of murder offense: Allahabad HC takes note practice by Trial Courts| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court took note of practice by Trial Courts of mechanical application of Section 302 of IPC in cases already involving dowry deaths.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court took note of practice by Trial Courts of mechanical application of Section 302 of IPC in cases already involving dowry deaths.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-01T05:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-05T04:12:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/\",\"name\":\"Mechanical addition charges u\/s 302 IPC dowry cases dilutes severity of murder offense: Allahabad HC takes note practice by Trial Courts| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-01T05:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-05T04:12:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court took note of practice by Trial Courts of mechanical application of Section 302 of IPC in cases already involving dowry deaths.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mechanical addition charges u\/s 302 IPC dowry cases dilutes severity of murder offense: Allahabad HC takes note practice by Trial Courts| SCC Times","description":"Allahabad High Court took note of practice by Trial Courts of mechanical application of Section 302 of IPC in cases already involving dowry deaths.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts","og_description":"Allahabad High Court took note of practice by Trial Courts of mechanical application of Section 302 of IPC in cases already involving dowry deaths.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-01T05:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-05T04:12:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/","name":"Mechanical addition charges u\/s 302 IPC dowry cases dilutes severity of murder offense: Allahabad HC takes note practice by Trial Courts| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-01T05:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-05T04:12:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad High Court took note of practice by Trial Courts of mechanical application of Section 302 of IPC in cases already involving dowry deaths.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/mechanical-addition-charges-us-302-ipc-dowry-cases-dilutes-severity-murder-offense-allahabad-hc-takes-note-practice-trial-courts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mechanical addition of charges u\/s 302 IPC in dowry cases dilutes the severity of murder as an offense: Allahabad HC takes note of practice by Trial Courts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234059,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/17\/kar-hc-when-can-court-presume-under-s-113-a-evidence-act-that-dowry-death-has-been-caused-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":325400,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | When can Court presume under S. 113-A Evidence Act, that dowry death has been caused? HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of B.A. Patil and Hanchate Sanjeevkumar, JJ., upheld the decision of the trial court with regard to dowry death. By the instant criminal appeal, the decision of the Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga has been challenged. Counsel for the appellant-accused: Iswaraj S. Chowdapur and Additional State\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248929,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/30\/judges-need-to-be-extra-careful-while-conducting-criminal-trials-relating-to-dowry-deaths-supreme-court-read-guidelines\/","url_meta":{"origin":325400,"position":1},"title":"Judges need to be extra careful while conducting criminal trials relating to dowry deaths: Supreme Court [Read guidelines]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case relating to dowry death, the bench of NV Ramana*, CJ and Aniruddha Bose, J has said that judges need to be extra careful while conducting criminal trials relating to Section 304-B, IPC. The Court went on to summarise the law under Section 304\u00adB, IPC read\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/10\/allahabad-high-court-grants-anticipatory-bail-in-dowry-death-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325400,"position":2},"title":"Death of victim cannot be termed as \u201cnot under normal circumstances\u201d; Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail in dowry death case","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 438 was inserted in CrPC as it was seen that the influential persons try to implicate their rivals in false cases for the purpose of disgracing them by detaining them in jail for some time. It is true, such powers are to be exercised in exceptional cases. The prosecution\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224303,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/18\/bom-hc-law-does-not-permit-trial-court-to-reconstruct-a-new-theory-of-its-own-from-residual-parts-of-prosecution-evidence-to-convict-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":325400,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Law does not permit trial court to reconstruct a new theory of its own from residual parts of prosecution evidence to convict the accused\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: K.K. Sonawane, J., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for committing the offence of cruelty to women punishable under Section 498-A IPC and for abetment of suicide punishable under Section 306 IPC.\u00a0 The appellant was the sister-in-law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351058,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/mere-possibility-of-contrary-view-doesnt-justify-reversal-of-acquittal-raj-hc-upholds-acquittal-in-dowry-death-case-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":325400,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Mere possibility of contrary view doesn\u2019t justify reversal of acquittal\u2019; Rajasthan High Court upholds acquittal in Dowry Death case","author":"Ritu","date":"June 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cScope of interference in the acquittal order passed by the Trial Court is very limited, and if the impugned judgment of the Trial Court demonstrates a legally plausible view, mere possibility of a contrary view shall not justify the reversal of acquittal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249776,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/14\/dowry-death-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":325400,"position":5},"title":"S. 304-B IPC and S. 113-B of Evidence Act are decisive provisions to ascertain unnatural death as dowry death: Allahabad HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Pathak, J., addressed a matter of dowry death and upheld the lower court\u2019s decision. Factual Matrix An FIR was filed by the informant (PW-1) with regard to the dowry death of his daughter who was allegedly killed by her in-laws. Accused was married to the informant\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325400\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}