{"id":325397,"date":"2024-07-01T10:08:27","date_gmt":"2024-07-01T04:38:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325397"},"modified":"2024-07-04T10:02:32","modified_gmt":"2024-07-04T04:32:32","slug":"no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/","title":{"rendered":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tripura high Court:<\/span> The present appeal under Section 54<\/a> of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894<\/a> (‘the LA Act’) was preferred challenging the order dated 25-01-2024 along with other orders passed by L.A. Judge, Sepahijala District, Bishalgarh. Biswajit Palit, J.<\/span>, opined that there was no scope to prefer any appeal under Section 54<\/a> of the LA Act<\/a>, against any order specifically the order dated 25-01-2024 by the appellant as the appeal might only be preferred against the judgment\/award not against any particular order\/orders. The Court dismissed the appeal being devoid of merit as the same was not maintainable under Section 54<\/a> of LA Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Appellant submitted that in the original case, they were not made a party, so, they were totally in dark about the passing of award but during the course of execution proceeding, the matter came to their knowledge and accordingly, they sought redress before the High Court and by order dated 22-12-2023, the High Court gave an opportunity to the appellant to submit reply in the execution proceeding and accordingly, the appellant filed objection before the Executing Court but the Executing Court did not consider the same and by order dated 25-01-2024 disallowed the objection of the appellant and thus, the appellant preferred the present appeal, challenging the Executing Court’s order.<\/p>\n

Respondents submitted that the appellant before the Executing Court appeared and sought time to pay the decretal amount within a period of two months which was allowed by the Executing Court but thereafter without making any payment the appellant sought redress before the High Court and the High Court allowed the appellant to file objection before the Executing Court and the Executing Court disposed of the said objection by order dated 25-01-2024. Respondents thus challenged the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court under Section 54<\/a> of LA Act<\/a> and submitted that there was no scope to prefer any appeal challenging the order passed by the Executing Court and as such, the appeal was liable to be rejected without any merit as the same was barred by law.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court noted that by order dated 08-06-2023, the name of the PWD, NH Division was deleted from the execution case in view of the provision provided under Order 1 Rule X(2) of CPC and the name of the appellant was inserted as the Judgment Debtor. The appellant sought time to make the payment within a period of two months which was also allowed by the Executing Court, but thereafter on 08-08-2023, another petition was made by the appellant before the Executing Court to strike out their name from the execution case as in the original case and that petition was disallowed by the Executing Court on the ground that on the prayer of the appellant, the name of the appellant was inserted in the execution proceeding. After that, the appellant sought redress before the High Court and the High Court by order dated 22-12-2023 disposed of the petition.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, the Court noted that in pursuance of the direction of the High Court, the Judgment debtor, i.e., the appellant on 25-01-2024 filed one objection before the Executing Court stating to delete their name from the execution proceeding and again to insert the name of the Executive Engineer PWD, NH Division as Judgment debtor in place of the appellant but the Executing Court disposed of the said objection on the ground that the matter was already decided by order dated 08-08-2023. The same was challenged before the High Court and the High Court by order dated 22-12-2023 upheld the order of the Executing Court as there was no scope to reopen the matter.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to Section 54<\/a> of the LA Act<\/a> and opined that there was no scope to prefer any appeal against any order specifically the order dated 25-01-2024 by the appellant as the appeal might only be preferred against the judgment\/award not against any particular order\/orders. The Court held that since against the order of any execution proceeding, there was no scope to prefer any appeal, thus, it did not find any scope to entertain the present appeal preferred by the appellant before the High Court invoking Section 54<\/a> of LA Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the appeal being devoid of merit as the same was not maintainable under Section 54<\/a> of LA Act<\/a>. The Court stated that the Executing Court shall proceed to execute the award passed by the L.A. Judge at the earliest.<\/p>\n

[Union of India v. Anil Plantation (P) Ltd., 2024 SCC OnLine Tri 450<\/a>, decided on 24-06-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Appellant: CGC B. Majumder<\/p>\n

For the Respondents: Senior Advocate D. K. Biswas; Advocate D.S. Kunwar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The appellant filed an objection before the Executing Court to delete their name from the execution proceeding and to insert the name of Executive Engineer PWD, NH Division as Judgment debtor but the Executing Court disposed of objection on the ground that matter was already decided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314902,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,32949,35513,30320,70377,2586],"class_list":["post-325397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-executing-court","tag-land-acquisition-act-1894","tag-order","tag-section-54","tag-Tripura_High_Court"],"yoast_head":"\nNo appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tripura High Court opined that no appeal lies under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the orders of the Executing Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court opined that no appeal lies under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the orders of the Executing Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-01T04:38:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-04T04:32:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/\",\"name\":\"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-01T04:38:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-04T04:32:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Tripura High Court opined that no appeal lies under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the orders of the Executing Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Tripura High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura HC","description":"Tripura High Court opined that no appeal lies under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the orders of the Executing Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court","og_description":"Tripura High Court opined that no appeal lies under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the orders of the Executing Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-01T04:38:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-04T04:32:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/","name":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","datePublished":"2024-07-01T04:38:27+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-04T04:32:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Tripura High Court opined that no appeal lies under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the orders of the Executing Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Tripura High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":337202,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/13\/section-28-a-land-acquisition-act-limitation-period-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":325397,"position":0},"title":"Limitation for application for redetermination of compensation under S. 28-A of Land Acquisition Act starts from date of award: Supreme Court reaffirms","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court highlighted that the judgment in Union of India v. Pradeep Kumari, (1995) 2 SCC 736 has been rendered after considering the relevant provisions of the Statute and the principles of interpretation. However, the judgment in Ramsingbhai Jerambhai v. State of Gujarat, (2018) 16 SCC 445 is a short\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 28-A Land Acquisition Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Section-28-A-Land-Acquisition-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Section-28-A-Land-Acquisition-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Section-28-A-Land-Acquisition-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Section-28-A-Land-Acquisition-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/litigant-should-not-suffer-due-to-inadvertence-of-the-counsel\/","url_meta":{"origin":325397,"position":1},"title":"Litigant should not suffer due to inadvertence of the counsel","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arindam Lodh, J. disposed of an appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act 1984 and directed the appellant to file his claim before the LA Judge. The appeal was filed against the decision of the LA Judge who dismissed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/28\/reference-court-under-land-acquisition-act-1894-is-duty-bound-to-hear-beneficiary-of-acquisition-in-proceedings-seeking-enhancement-of-compensation-payable-to-land-owner\/","url_meta":{"origin":325397,"position":2},"title":"Reference Court under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is duty bound to hear beneficiary of acquisition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Krishna S. Dixit, J. while hearing a civil writ petition, quashed Reference Court\u2019s order under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 enhancing compensation payable to land owners without affording a hearing to the beneficiary of acquisition. Petitioner, a beneficiary of land acquisition, challenged\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":325397,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The contention that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 100 of CPC cannot be accepted, rather the appeal filed by appellant is maintainable before the Court as the order of Additional District Judge is a decree.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309803,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/despite-substantial-delay-right-to-property-under-article-300a-supports-compensation-claim-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":325397,"position":4},"title":"Right to property| Calcutta High Court directs payment of compensation under Article 300A despite substantial delay","author":"Ritu","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the Municipality's possession without proper acquisition procedures is deemed illegal, and the State is directed to initiate proceedings and pay compensation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/03\/irrevocable-vesting-of-land-in-state-regardless-of-non-utilization-for-intended-purpose-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":325397,"position":5},"title":"Subsequent purchase of land acquired by State does not give purchaser right to challenge acquisition: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the issuance of a subsequent notification and the notice by the National Highway Authority did not affect the validity of the earlier acquisition.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314902"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}