{"id":325266,"date":"2024-06-28T11:00:44","date_gmt":"2024-06-28T05:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325266"},"modified":"2024-06-28T09:39:12","modified_gmt":"2024-06-28T04:09:12","slug":"telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/","title":{"rendered":"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Telangana High Court:<\/span> The present criminal petition was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) seeking to quash FIR registered by P.S. Central Crime Station against petitioner allegedly taking bribe to influence judges. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">K. Lakshman, J.<\/span>, directed that as the investigation was pending, FIR could not be quashed but opined that petitioner was protected from arrest till filing of the final report.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent 3, the complainant belonged to a Scheduled Caste and in 1982, his father and other members of his community purchased lands and the entire sale consideration was paid, and physical possession was handed over. But in 2005, third parties started encroaching on it. Therefore, civil suits were filed, and revenue proceedings were initiated in relation to the lands owned by Respondent 3 and his community members. Thereafter, petitioner was engaged as their counsel and accordingly, the relevant documents were handed over to him. Respondent 3 alleged that petitioner assured him that he had a good case, and they would win the case and thus, a fee of Rs 30 lakh was demanded by him, which was duly paid. But after receiving the fee, petitioner did not pursue the case and there was no progress in the pending cases.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondents claimed that petitioner stated that he could manage the High Court judges and get a judgment in Respondent 3&#8217;s favour and in other cases too, he had paid money to the judges and got favourable orders. Thereafter, Respondent 3 paid Rs 7 crore in cash to petitioner but later, Respondent 3 got to know that petitioner colluded with opposite side and obtained Rs 25 crore in cash and after receiving the said amount, he failed to appear on Respondent 3&#8217;s behalf. Thus, it was alleged in the complaint that, despite receiving Rs 7 crore, petitioner failed to appear in the case, and he cheated Respondent 3 by inducing him to pay Rs 7 crore by representing that the said amount would be paid to the judges of the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent 3 and his community members demanded the money back from petitioner, however, instead of returning the money, petitioner hurled caste-based abuses against Respondent 3. Respondent 3 informed petitioner that he would lodge a complaint, thus, petitioner returned Rs 1 crore but failed to return the remaining amount. When the remaining amount was demanded, petitioner threatened to get Respondent 3 and his minor children abducted and killed. Further, petitioner with the help of Accused 2, an MLA of the Malakpet constituency, was harassing and threatening Respondent 3 with his life.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, based on the said complaints, a case was registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561742\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">406<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">420<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(2)(v-a)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(1)(r)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (&#8216;SC &amp; SC Act&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that as per the complaint, when petitioner made the alleged representation to bribe the judges, Respondent 3 agreed and paid Rs 7 crore. Thus, the Court stated that this raised a question that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;whether a complainant who was a party to an illegal agreement could maintain an action under the criminal law for non-performance of such an agreement and allege cheating?&#8221;<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yacoob<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Emperor<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1933 SCC OnLine Rang 156<\/a>, wherein it was held that the criminal proceedings were maintainable, even if the complainant was party to an illegal agreement. The Court also relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nagi Reddy<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 SCC OnLine AP 25<\/a>, wherein it was held that criminal proceedings alleging cheating were maintainable, even if the amount was paid for an illegal purpose. Thus, the Court opined that though Respondent 3 agreed to pay Rs 7 crore to petitioner for an illegal purpose i.e., to bribe the judges of the High Court, a criminal complaint, against petitioner was still maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2021) 19 SCC 401<\/a> and observed that the power under Section 482 of CrPC had to be exercised sparingly and at the stage of investigation, the proceedings could not be scuttled, and the authorities must be given an opportunity to unearth the truth.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the allegation regarding the payment of Rs 7 crore by Respondent 3 seemed exaggerated and its plausibility was doubtful, though it was true that he gave no information about how he obtained that amount and when it was paid to petitioner, the allegations still were worthy of investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that Respondent 3&#8217;s conduct in participation of the illegal act alleged against petitioner raised suspicions about him being bona fide and nothing in the counter-affidavit indicated that petitioner&#8217;s custodial interrogation was required. Further, the Court noted that petitioner was a Senior Advocate with long standing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in the present case, along with the offences under IPC, offences under SC &amp; ST Act were alleged against petitioner and it further clarified that the grant of protection from arrest was not in contravention of Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551140\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002909767\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SC &amp; ST Act<\/a>. The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prathvi Raj Chauhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2020) 4 SCC 727<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court while upholding the vires of Section 18-A held that protection from arrest under SC &amp; ST Act could be granted in appropriate cases while exercising the power under Section 482 of CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This Court vide order dated 07-03-2024 had directed the Investigating Officer to conduct investigation on the aspects of, (a) pendency of cases in different courts including this Court where Respondent 3 was a party; (b) appearance of petitioner on behalf of Respondent 3 in the said cases including filing of vakalath, written statement, plaint, petitions, counters etc; (c) paying capacity of Respondent 3; (d) borrowing of huge amount of 7 crore from the friends of Respondent 3 as contended by him; and (e) proceedings issued by Government of India to the effect that any transaction over and above Rs 2 lakh should not be in cash, and it should be only online or cheque.<\/p>\n<p>The Court disposed of the present criminal petition with the following directions:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha;\">\n<li>\n<p>As the investigation was pending, FIR could not be quashed;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Petitioner was protected from arrest till filing of the final report;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation as and when required; and if petitioner failed to co-operate in the investigation, the authorities were at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Investigating officer shall conduct investigation strictly in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. State of Telangana, Criminal Petition No. 1866 of 204, decided on 24-06-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> V. Pattabhi, Senior Counsel<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Palle Nageshwar Rao, Public Prosecutor; Nimma Narayana, Counsel<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court opined that the allegation that money is obtained to bribe the judges of this Court casts a serious doubt on the independence of judiciary and implies that justice is up for sale and such serious allegations need to be investigated.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":315575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2680,3067,70305,70306,15281,33941],"class_list":["post-325266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bribe","tag-FIR","tag-influence-judges","tag-pending-investigation","tag-senior-advocate","tag-telangana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Investigation is pending\u2019; Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana High Court, after noting that investigation was pending, refused to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telangana High Court, after noting that investigation was pending, refused to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-28T05:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Investigation is pending\u2019; Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-28T05:30:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Telangana High Court, after noting that investigation was pending, refused to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Telangana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Investigation is pending\u2019; Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges | SCC Times","description":"Telangana High Court, after noting that investigation was pending, refused to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation","og_description":"Telangana High Court, after noting that investigation was pending, refused to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-28T05:30:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/","name":"\u2018Investigation is pending\u2019; Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-28T05:30:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Telangana High Court, after noting that investigation was pending, refused to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Telangana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/telhc-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-senior-advocate-allegedly-taking-bribe-to-influence-judges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Telangana HC refuses to quash FIR against Senior Advocate allegedly taking bribe to influence Judges due to pending investigation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":226493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/ker-hc-court-decides-it-would-be-premature-to-quash-an-fir-since-investigation-is-still-pending-directs-investigating-officer-to-consider-factors-put-forth-by-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":325266,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Court decides it would be premature to quash an FIR since investigation is still pending; directs investigating officer to consider factors put forth by petitioner","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Ashok Menon, J., disposed of a criminal miscellaneous application since the matter was under investigation and at an early stage to quash the First Information Report (FIR). In the present case, the petitioner has been alleged to have committed an offence under Section 153 A of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235925,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/18\/telangana-hc-can-hc-decide-whether-an-fir-is-false-or-frivolous-hc-discusses-in-a-case-where-an-employee-is-suspended-in-light-of-ongoing-criminal-case-departmental-enquiry\/","url_meta":{"origin":325266,"position":1},"title":"Telangana HC | Can HC decide whether an FIR is false or frivolous? HC discusses in a case where an employee is suspended in light of ongoing criminal case &#038; departmental enquiry","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ and T. Vinod Kumar, J., while addressing a writ appeal observed that the High Court cannot decide whether the FIR is a false or frivolous one. Facts In the instant appeal, as per the facts of the case, petitioner was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270704,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/27\/allegations-of-bribery-to-grant-permission-in-order-to-receive-foreign-funds-under-fcra-on-applications-by-ngos-pending-in-home-ministry-delhi-court-grants-bail-to-pramod-kumar-bhasin\/","url_meta":{"origin":325266,"position":2},"title":"Allegations of bribery to grant permission in order to receive foreign funds under FCRA on applications by NGO&#8217;s pending in Home Ministry; Delhi Court grants bail to Pramod Kumar Bhasin","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rouse Avenue Court, New Delhi: While granting bail to the applicant Pramond Kumar Bhasin, Ajay Gulati, J. observed that the charge sheet has not even mentioned the role of the applicant in demanding the alleged bribe from NGO GOREF even though the employee of an NGO Ganga Orthopedic Research and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rouse Avenue","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/rouse_avenue.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/rouse_avenue.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/rouse_avenue.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/rouse_avenue.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/rouse_avenue.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/manipur-hc-directs-completion-of-pending-investigation-in-10-years-old-uapa-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325266,"position":3},"title":"Manipur HC directs State and Officer-in-charge to complete pending Investigation in 10-years-old UAPA case within 6 months","author":"Editor","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that offences under UAPA are serious ones relating to the security of the nation and FIR cannot be quashed on mere technicalities without going to the complete merit of the case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"manipur high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/05\/trial-not-likely-to-conclude-soon-lack-of-evidence-to-prove-corruption-read-why-punjab-and-haryana-high-granted-bail-to-vijay-singla\/","url_meta":{"origin":325266,"position":4},"title":"Trial not likely to conclude soon; lack of evidence to prove corruption: Read why Punjab and Haryana High granted bail to Vijay Singla","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While dealing with a corruption case, Lisa Gill, J., allowed the bail petition preferred by the petitioner against the trial upon FIR dated 24-05-2022 and held that as the trial is not likely to conclude in the near future, no useful purpose would be served\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/mere-recovery-of-amount-cannot-prove-alleged-demand-of-bribe-thc-sets-aside-conviction-against-sub-inspector-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325266,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Mere recovery of amount cannot prove alleged demand of bribe\u2019; Telangana HC sets aside conviction against Sub-Inspector of Police","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Investigating Officer becomes functus officio when charge sheet is filed after investigation, unless there will be further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325266"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325266\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}