{"id":325067,"date":"2024-06-25T14:00:55","date_gmt":"2024-06-25T08:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=325067"},"modified":"2024-07-01T11:32:37","modified_gmt":"2024-07-01T06:02:37","slug":"court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Telangana High Court:<\/span> The present petition was filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, wherein the petitioner assailed the validity of the order dated 23-04-2024 passed by the Special Judge for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar (&#8216;the Commercial Court&#8217;), whereby Respondent 1 was permitted to withdraw Rs 50,85,490 deposited by petitioner. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Alok Aradhe, CJ.<\/span>, and Anil Kumar Jukanti, J., opined that the Court while dealing with a prayer to release the amount under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546081\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942157\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006<\/a> (&#8216;the 2006 Act&#8217;) had to assign reasons for releasing such percentage of the amount as it considered reasonable. The Court thus disposed of the petition and set aside the order dated 23-04-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner is a Government of India Enterprise incorporated to promote, aid, and foster the growth of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in the country. The petitioner and Respondent 1 entered into an agreement on 14-05-2013 under tender marketing scheme. The dispute between the parties subsequently arose, which was referred for adjudication to Facilitation Council under the 2006 Act. The Council passed an award on 03-11-2022 in Respondent 1&#8217;s favour, which was challenged in a proceeding under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a>, the petitioner deposited Rs 50,23,828 which was kept in the fixed deposit. The Commercial Court by an ex parte order dated 14-12-2023 called for the FDR along with interest. Thereafter, by order dated 23-04-2024, the Commercial Court permitted withdrawal of the amount by Respondent 1. Thus, the present petition was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546081\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942157\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the 2006 Act<\/a> and observed that the Court was empowered to permit release of such percentage of amount deposited to the supplier as it considered reasonable under the circumstances of the case, subject to such condition as it deemed necessary to impose. The Court thus opined that the Court while dealing with a prayer to release the amount had to assign reasons for releasing such percentage of the amount as it considered reasonable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in the present case, the petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544941\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a> seeking stay of the award was also pending. The Court stated that the propriety demanded that the Commercial Court ought to have dealt with both the applications together. The Court also noted that the Commercial Court had not assigned any reason for releasing the whole amount by the petitioner in Respondent 1&#8217;s favour.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court disposed of the petition and set aside the order dated 23-04-2024. The Court directed the Commercial Court to decide the application along with the petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544941\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a>, after hearing the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">National Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. v. Brahma Teja Paper Products, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GR7MUOsf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine TS 1346<\/a>, Order dated 19-06-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Senior Counsel J. Prabhakar; Counsel D. Venkata Padmaja<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Counsel Dida Vijaya Kumar<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png\" alt=\"arbitration and conciliation act, 1996\" width=\"191\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294803\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png 191w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-38x60.png 38w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 191px) 100vw, 191px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court is empowered to permit release of such percentage of amount under Section 19 of the MSME Act, 2006, deposited to the supplier as it considers reasonable under the circumstances of the case, subject to such condition as it deems necessary to impose.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":315575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[47046,70206,62091,70205,23694,33941],"class_list":["post-325067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-commercial-court","tag-msme-act-2006","tag-reason","tag-release-amount","tag-section-19","tag-telangana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Court must give reasons for releasing amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana High Court held that the Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telangana High Court held that the Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-25T08:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-01T06:02:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/\",\"name\":\"Court must give reasons for releasing amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-25T08:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-01T06:02:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Telangana High Court held that the Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Telangana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court must give reasons for releasing amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana HC","description":"Telangana High Court held that the Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court","og_description":"Telangana High Court held that the Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-25T08:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-01T06:02:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/","name":"Court must give reasons for releasing amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-25T08:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-01T06:02:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Telangana High Court held that the Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Telangana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/11\/explained-pre-deposit-of-75-of-arbitration-award-amount-under-section-19-of-the-msme-act-2006-mandatory-or-discretionary\/","url_meta":{"origin":325067,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Pre-deposit of 75% of arbitration award amount under Section 19 of the MSME Act, 2006 mandatory or discretionary?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and AS Bopanna, JJ has held that in an appeal\/application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 19[1] of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act, 2006), the appellate court would not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/","url_meta":{"origin":325067,"position":1},"title":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside the impugned order and directed the District Court to decide the matter afresh.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339976,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/29\/navigating-msme-law-in-2024-key-judicial-pronouncements\/","url_meta":{"origin":325067,"position":2},"title":"Navigating MSME Law in 2024: Key Judicial Pronouncements","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhisaar Bairagi*, Milind Sharma** and Ausaf Ayyub***","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Key Judicial Pronouncements","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Key-Judicial-Pronouncements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Key-Judicial-Pronouncements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Key-Judicial-Pronouncements.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Key-Judicial-Pronouncements.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321368,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/del-hc-dismisses-section11-arbitration-petition-due-arbitration-proceedings-under-msme-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325067,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses S. 11 Arbitration petition due to Debit Notes issued after MSMED registration in arbitration proceedings","author":"Arunima","date":"May 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"MSMED Act is a beneficial legislation for Micro Small & Medium Enterprises and provides that a buyer can also raise counter claims before the statutory arbitrator under the MSMED Act. Moreover, the scope of the Act as stated therein is to the extent that even if there is an agreement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/benefits-under-msme-act-do-not-apply-retrospectively-if-registration-is-obtained-after-commencement-of-contract-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":325067,"position":4},"title":"Benefits under MSME Act do not apply retrospectively if registration is obtained after commencement of contract: Delhi HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe purpose of Sections 17 and 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, gives the right to a micro, small and medium enterprise to have its disputes adjudicated by approaching the facilitation councils and it cannot be obliterated on account of any other contract to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288083,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/31\/why-section-34-ac-act-challenge-is-not-efficacious-for-msme-awards-making-a-case-exercise-of-article-227\/","url_meta":{"origin":325067,"position":5},"title":"Why Section 34 (A&#038;C Act) Challenge is Not Efficacious for MSME Awards? Making a Case Exercise of Article 227","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui*, Shireen F. Khan** and Sameer Mishra***","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Case Exercise of Article 227","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-945.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-945.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-945.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-945.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325067\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}