{"id":324136,"date":"2024-06-11T18:00:25","date_gmt":"2024-06-11T12:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=324136"},"modified":"2024-06-18T17:51:58","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T12:21:58","slug":"delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court<\/span>: A suit was filed by Fab India (plaintiff) seeking permanent injunction restraining defendants, and all those acting for and, on their behalf, from manufacturing, selling, retailing, advertising, dealing with products under the mark ‘FABINDIA’ or any other mark which is deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s mark and other attendant relief. Anish Dayal, J., held that the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for grant of an ex-parte ad interim injunction and balance of convenience lies in favour of plaintiff, and they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in case the injunction, as prayed for, is not granted.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff, an Indian retail company, specializes in producing and selling a wide range of handcrafted goods under the trademark ‘FABINDIA.’ Incorporated in 1960, the company has established a significant presence in India, operating numerous retail outlets across major cities and an extensive online platform. The plaintiff claims to have secured more than 100 registrations for its trademarks, and its financial records indicate substantial turnover, with Rs. 95 crores in online sales and Rs. 1185.74 crores in offline sales for the fiscal year 2022-2023. These sales span various product categories, including apparel, home and lifestyle products, accessories, personal care items, and food and beverages.<\/p>\n

The dispute arose when the plaintiff discovered in January 2024 that the defendants were operating retail stores in Delhi under the name ‘FAB INDIA EMPORIUM.’ The defendants were allegedly selling products using a name deceptively similar to ‘FABINDIA,’ thereby causing potential confusion among consumers. This discovery prompted the plaintiff to file a suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from using the mark ‘FABINDIA’ or any other deceptively similar mark. The plaintiff provided evidence, including invoices issued by the defendants, to demonstrate that the defendants were not only using similar tradename but also conducting sales under it.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff argued that the use of the mark ‘FAB INDIA EMPORIUM’ by the defendants infringed upon their well-established trademark ‘FABINDIA,’ which had garnered significant goodwill and reputation over decades. The plaintiff contended that such use was likely to cause confusion and deception among consumers, leading to irreparable harm to their business. They emphasized the extensive use and registration of their trademarks across various categories and sought immediate relief in the form of an ex-parte ad interim injunction. The defendants, although not explicitly detailed in the order, were implied to have been operating their business with a GST registration, which the court noted in its order.<\/p>\n

The Court noted the long-standing use and reputation of the ‘FABINDIA’ mark and acknowledged the potential for consumer confusion due to the defendants’ use of a similar tradename. The Court was convinced that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for the grant of an ex-parte ad interim injunction. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and the court recognized that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction were not granted.<\/p>\n

The Court, satisfied with the plaintiff’s arguments and evidence, granted the following reliefs:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    The defendants and all those acting on their behalf were restrained from using the word ‘FABINDIA’ for their store, as part of their tradename, or for any other products or services. The injunction order was set to come into effect three months from the date of the order to allow the defendants time to change their tradename and brand under which they were selling their products.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    The defendants were ordered to disclose their annual sales since the commencement of their operations, certified by a Chartered Accountant. They were also required to disclose the date of commencement of their operations via an affidavit to be filed within four weeks, with copies provided to the plaintiff’s counsel.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    [Fab India v. Fab India Emporium, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 4379<\/a>, decided on 15-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    Mr. Viraj Datar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dipankar Vig, Mr. Pranay Sarkar, Mr. Kunal Juneja, Ms. Ujjwala Gupta, Mr. Abhinav S., Mr. Jahangir Ahmad and Mr. Saurav Joon, Advocates for plaintiff<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    “Invoices issued by the defendant have also been procured which exhibit that they are selling products not only in their store under the name of “FAB INDIA EMPORIUM” but they are also selling their products under the same tradename.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,69703,69704,14201,18071],"class_list":["post-324136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-fab-india","tag-fab-india-emporium","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-11T12:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-18T12:21:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-11T12:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-18T12:21:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.","description":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks","og_description":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-11T12:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-18T12:21:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-11T12:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-18T12:21:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":283811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/delhi-high-court-injuncts-intercontinental-great-brand-from-using-fabio-being-deceptive-similar-to-parle-product-oreo-injunction-trademark-trade-dress-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":324136,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Parle company from using FAB!O being deceptively similar to Cadbury’s OREO","author":"Editor","date":"February 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection who has earlier purchased and had the OREO cookie would, when he sees the FAB!O cookie pack, be clearly likely to associate the FAB!O cookie with the OREO cookie that he had earlier enjoyed (ass uming he did). That, by itself, satisfies\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":325977,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/07\/top-intellectual-property-cases-june-2024-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":324136,"position":1},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights | A quick view of top Intellectual Property cases in June 2024","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick recap of Intellectual Property cases passed by the High Courts in the month of June 2024 along with some top stories on Domino\u2019s, Infosys Trademark Infringement, Patent for Portable Vehicle Management System and much more.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property cases Roundup June 2024","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Intellectual-Property-cases-Roundup-June-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Intellectual-Property-cases-Roundup-June-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Intellectual-Property-cases-Roundup-June-2024.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Intellectual-Property-cases-Roundup-June-2024.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":324136,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-of-boeing-company-legal-updates-research-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":324136,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Advance Technologies from using logo similar to The Boeing Company; Directs costs upto 5 lakhs","author":"Arunima","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that customers are being misled by the defendants and the entire effort is deliberate and dishonest amounting to dilution of the reputation and goodwill of the trademark\/logo of the plaintiffs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/delhi-high-court-restrains-biogen-serums-from-using-product-using-betnol-marks-being-similar-to-glaxo-group-betnesol-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":324136,"position":4},"title":"[Betnesol v Betnol]: Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Glaxo Group Limited on failure to file written statement by Biogen Serums","author":"Arunima","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that the defendant has used the infringing mark \u2018BETNOL\u2019, which is identical to the plaintiff's mark \u2018BETNESOL\u2019 with the intent to springboard its business by drawing association with the plaintiff and its trademark to ride on the goodwill and reputation of the mark of the plaintiff.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-rpg-enterprises-ltd-for-its-mark-rpg-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-awards-rs-3-lakhs-as-damages\/","url_meta":{"origin":324136,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit; awards Rs. 3 lakhs as damages","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019. Further, RPG Developers (P) Ltd. were restrained from offering\/rendering any services using the impugned trade mark \u2018RPG\u2019 and\/or \u2018RPG DEVELOPERS\u2019 and\/or artistic work which was a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's artistic work or any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=324136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324136\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=324136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=324136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=324136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}