{"id":324107,"date":"2024-06-11T16:00:18","date_gmt":"2024-06-11T10:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=324107"},"modified":"2024-06-18T17:43:21","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T12:13:21","slug":"delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#8217;s Bail"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> An appeal was filed by Sharjeel Imam (appellant), an accused in Delhi Riots case in 2020, challenging the order dated 17-02-2024, passed by the Trial Court, which denied his plea for release on bail under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519736\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">436-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. A division bench of Suresh Kumar Kait and Manoj Jain, JJ., held that there was nothing on record which could have disentitled the accused from seeking relief under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519736\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">436-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and directed that appellant be released on bail on terms and conditions to be imposed by the learned Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;We must be mindful of the objective behind incorporating Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519736\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">436-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. This benevolent provision has been introduced by Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 2005 with the idea that no undertrial prisoner is detained in jail beyond half of the maximum sentence provided for such offences. Undoubtedly, as per proviso, Court can order further detention, but the reasons must be rational and logical, else the very purpose of introducing the provision would stand defeated.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant was arrested on 28-01-2020 for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">124A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561417\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153B<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554025\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808781\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act<\/a> (UAPA) and has been in custody since then. The charges were framed on 15-03-2022, and the trial proceeded with the prosecution examining 22 out of 48 cited witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial court recognized that the constitutionality of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">124-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was under review by the Supreme Court, referencing the case of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5pjcW6IZ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2022) 7 SCC 433<\/a>, where the Supreme Court suggested the provision was outdated and stayed all trials under this section. Consequently, the appellant requested a stay of trial and bail, but the Special Court denied this request on 23-07-2022. This denial was appealed, and the trial was stayed, particularly the recording of evidence from key witnesses, pending the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Despite being in custody for over four years, the appellant sought bail under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519736\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">436-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, which allows bail for undertrial prisoners who have served half the maximum sentence. The trial court acknowledged that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">124-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> should not be considered due to the Supreme Court&#8217;s directions and focused on Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554025\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808781\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">UAPA<\/a>, which carries a maximum sentence of seven years. Although the appellant had served more than half of this sentence, the trial court declined bail, citing the exceptional nature of the case and the severity of the allegations, including speeches inciting riots and significant damage to public property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant filed the present appeal under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552194\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Investigation Agency Act, 2008<\/a>. Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519736\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">436-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> stipulates that an undertrial prisoner should be released on bail if they have served half the maximum sentence unless the court, for recorded reasons, orders continued detention. The appellant had undeniably served more than half of the maximum sentence. The Trial court excluded Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">124-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> from consideration, aligning with Supreme Court directions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The trial court&#8217;s decision was primarily based on the seriousness of the allegations and perceived exceptional circumstances. However, there was no indication that the appellant had caused any delay in the proceedings. The prosecution argued that the appellant&#8217;s legal challenges contributed to delays and that he sought to benefit from these delays, but the appellate court found no merit in this contention. The court noted that availing legal remedies should not be seen as causing undue delay, especially when the stay was based on mutual consent and not challenged by the state.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Appellate court emphasized the purpose of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519736\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">436-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> to prevent prolonged detention of undertrial prisoners and found the trial court&#8217;s reasoning insufficient to deny bail. The court held that serious allegations alone do not justify denying bail under Section 436-A. The court also noted that where bail was granted despite claims of trial delay attributed to the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Conclusively, the Appellate court saw no justifiable reason to deny the appellant bail and directed his release on terms to be set by the trial court. The appeal was allowed, and the order was to be immediately communicated to the trial court for compliance, thereby disposing of the appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sharjeel Imam v. State NCT of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/78K4X9rS\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 4378<\/a>, decided on 29-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Talib Mustafa, Mr. Ahmad Ibrahim, Ms. Raksha Agarwal, Mr. Kartik Venu, Mr. Shaurca Tyagi and Ms. Ayesha Zaidi, Advocates for appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Talib Mustafa, Mr. Ahmad Ibrahim, Ms. Raksha Agarwal, Mr. Kartik Venu, Mr. Shaurca Tyagi and Ms. Ayesha Zaidi, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">If any accused chooses to avail legal remedy and that too in terms of specific judicial pronouncement, he cannot be blamed for causing delay in the matter. Since he continued to be in detention, he was, even otherwise, not going to dig out any advantage at all, by exploring such other possible legal avenues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,8441,2543,39756,69683,61256,42043],"class_list":["post-324107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-communal-riots","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-delhi-riots","tag-grounds-of-delay","tag-legal-remedies","tag-sharjeel-imam"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi HC rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#039;s Bail | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#039;s Bail negating availing legal remedies as grounds for delay for denying bail.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#039;s Bail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#039;s Bail negating availing legal remedies as grounds for delay for denying bail.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-11T10:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-18T12:13:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#039;s Bail\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi HC rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-11T10:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-18T12:13:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail negating availing legal remedies as grounds for delay for denying bail.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#8217;s Bail\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi HC rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail | SCC Times","description":"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail negating availing legal remedies as grounds for delay for denying bail.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail","og_description":"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail negating availing legal remedies as grounds for delay for denying bail.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-11T10:30:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-18T12:13:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi HC rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-11T10:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-18T12:13:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam's Bail negating availing legal remedies as grounds for delay for denying bail.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delh-high-court-rules-favour-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Delhi Riots 2020] Availing legal remedies cannot be grounds for delay; Delhi High Court rules in favor of Sharjeel Imam&#8217;s Bail"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-grants-bail-to-student-activist-sharjeel-imam-in-sedition-and-uapa-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":324107,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants bail to student activist Sharjeel Imam in Sedition and UAPA Case","author":"Editor","date":"May 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Sharjeel Imam would, however, continue to remain in custody due to his alleged involvement in the 2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/30\/delhi-court-grants-bail-to-jnu-student-sharjeel-imam-charged-for-sedition-during-anti-caa-protests\/","url_meta":{"origin":324107,"position":1},"title":"Delhi Court grants bail to JNU student Sharjeel Imam charged for sedition during Anti CAA protests","author":"Editor","date":"September 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Saket Court, Delhi: In an application filed seeking bail for Sharjeel Imam, (\u2018bail-applicant\u2019) who is a JNU student alleged for making inflammatory speeches at Jamia during Anti CAA-NRC protests in 2019, Anuj Agrawal J., granted bail in a sedition case being covered u\/s 436-A Criminal Procedure Code. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Saket-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Saket-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Saket-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Saket-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Saket-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/16\/supreme-court-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-bail-delhi-riots-2020-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":324107,"position":2},"title":"Inside the Supreme Court\u2019s Ruling on Umar Khalid &#038; Sharjeel Imam","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtube.com\/shorts\/ludUulke_-s?feature=share","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCC Times Newsflash&quot;","block_context":{"text":"SCC Times Newsflash","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/scc-times-newsflash\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court Khalid Sharjeel bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Supreme-Court-Khalid-Sharjeel-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Supreme-Court-Khalid-Sharjeel-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Supreme-Court-Khalid-Sharjeel-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Supreme-Court-Khalid-Sharjeel-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/04\/delhi-hc-denies-bail-sharjeel-imam-umar-khalid-delhi-2020-riots\/","url_meta":{"origin":324107,"position":3},"title":"Detailed overview of Delhi HC verdict denying bail to Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid and other co-accused in 2020 Anti-CAA Delhi Riots case","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Courts have to remain alive to both the ends of spectrum, on one hand, safeguarding the liberty of an accused, while on the other, ensuring the right of the prosecution to establish its case. The assessment of grant or refusal of bail, therefore, is also guided by a judicious\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sharjeel Imam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sharjeel-Imam.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sharjeel-Imam.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sharjeel-Imam.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sharjeel-Imam.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/07\/caa-nrc-protest-delhi-court-denies-bail-to-saleem-malik-due-to-sufficient-incriminating-material-against-him-in-north-east-delhi-riot-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":324107,"position":4},"title":"[CAA-NRC Protest] Delhi Court denies bail to Saleem Malik due to sufficient incriminating material against him in North-East Delhi Riot case","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Karkardooma Court, Delhi: In a bail application moved on behalf of applicant\/accused Saleem Malik @ Munna under Section 437 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) who was arrested under Section 147, 148, 149, 427, 423, 436, 120-B Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for conspiracy of North-East Delhi riots as part\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karkardooma-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karkardooma-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karkardooma-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karkardooma-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karkardooma-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-umar-khalid-bail-uapa-terrorism-riots-chakka-jam-caa-nrc-donald-trump-conspiracy-national-investigation-agency-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":324107,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses Umar Khalid\u2019s bail plea in 2020 riots case","author":"Editor","date":"October 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In an appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (\u2018NIA Act\u2019) read with Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 (\u2018UAPA\u2019), seeking setting aside of impugned order passed by Sessions Judge, whereby Umar Khalid's bail application was dismissed, the division bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-149-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=324107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324107\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=324107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=324107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=324107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}