{"id":323648,"date":"2024-06-05T18:00:03","date_gmt":"2024-06-05T12:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323648"},"modified":"2024-06-05T15:44:43","modified_gmt":"2024-06-05T10:14:43","slug":"dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"[MPLADS Funds] &#8216;Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority&#8217;; Delhi HC eschews CIC&#8217;s order"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the Union of India through the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation to challenge the orders dated 16-09-2018 and 16-10-2018 passed by the Central Information Commission (&#8216;CIC&#8217;), a Single Judge Bench of Subramonium Prasad, J., held that the impugned order stood eschewed to the extent of observations made by the CIC regarding the utilization and abuse of the MPLADS funds by the Members of Parliament (&#8216;MPs&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent filed an application for the Right to Information (&#8216;RTI&#8217;) on 26-09-2016 before the Central Public Information Officer, Lok Sabha seeking details of the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (&#8216;MPLADS&#8217;) along with other information. A reply was given on 21-10-2016, but dissatisfied with the reply, the respondent filed an appeal and a second appeal before the CIC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was the case of the petitioner that the CIC had exceeded its jurisdiction by commenting upon the action taken by the Members of Parliament in spending MPLADS funds which was beyond the jurisdiction of the CIC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the CIC should have confined itself only to the question raised in the RTI application or any other aspect concerning the RTI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that a perusal of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001541424\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a> (&#8216;RTI Act&#8217;) revealed that the CIC could only deal with issues relating to the information sought under the RTI Act or any other issue that leads to the dissipation of information as sought for by the applicant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court analyzed the impugned order and noted that the CIC had commented upon the utilization of funds receivable under MPLADS funds by various MPs and said that the CIC has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the scope of the RTI Act is only to ensure that information sought under the RTI Act is dissipated to secure access to information under the control of the public authorities. Therefore, the Court said that the observations made by the CIC commenting upon how the Members of Parliament are utilizing the MPLADS funds had to be expunged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While disposing of the petition, the Court held that the extent of observations, in the impugned order, made by the CIC regarding the utilization and abuse of MPLADS funds stood eschewed\/shunned. However, the Court retained the portion of the impugned order whereby the CIC had directed the public authority under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001541425\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(8)(a)(iii)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RTI Act<\/a> to publish the details of the funds, MP-wise, Constituency-wise, and work-wise<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Union of India v. Ram Gopal Dixit, W.P. (C) 5252 of 2020, Order dated 15-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner &#8212;<\/span> SPC Rahul Sharma, Advocate C.K. Bhatt, Advocate Ayush Bhatt<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent &#8212;<\/span> Advocate Lalit Bhardwaj, Advocate Jatin Anand Dwivedi<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Delhi High Court said that CIC can only deal with issues relating to information sought under the RTI Act or any other issue that leads to dissipation of information as sought by the applicant.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[69490,2555,2543,39632,69489,3609,62288],"class_list":["post-323648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-funds","tag-Central_Information_Commission","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-subramonium-prasad","tag-mplads","tag-public_authority","tag-utilization-of-funds"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[MPLADS Funds] Delhi HC eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order for adverse comments on public authority| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order as it has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[MPLADS Funds] &#039;Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority\u2019; Delhi HC eschews CIC\u2019s order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order as it has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-05T12:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[MPLADS Funds] &#039;Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority&#8217;; Delhi HC eschews CIC&#8217;s order\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"[MPLADS Funds] Delhi HC eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order for adverse comments on public authority| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-05T12:30:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order as it has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[MPLADS Funds] &#8216;Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority&#8217;; Delhi HC eschews CIC&#8217;s order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[MPLADS Funds] Delhi HC eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order for adverse comments on public authority| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order as it has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[MPLADS Funds] 'Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority\u2019; Delhi HC eschews CIC\u2019s order","og_description":"Delhi High Court eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order as it has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-05T12:30:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[MPLADS Funds] 'Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority&#8217;; Delhi HC eschews CIC&#8217;s order","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/","name":"[MPLADS Funds] Delhi HC eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order for adverse comments on public authority| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-05T12:30:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court eschews Central Information Commission\u2019s order as it has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/05\/dhc-eschews-cic-order-for-adverse-comments-on-public-authority-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[MPLADS Funds] &#8216;Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction to comment adversely upon the functioning of any public authority&#8217;; Delhi HC eschews CIC&#8217;s order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309966,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/22\/misuse-of-rti-act-will-dilute-its-importance-make-government-servants-dither-from-carrying-out-their-activities-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323648,"position":0},"title":"Misuse of RTI Act will dilute its importance and make government servants dither from carrying out their activities: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court has unfortunately been coming across various cases where abuse of Right to Information has led to paralysis and fear among Government officials.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":180824,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/continuation-members-parliament-local-area-development-scheme-beyond-12th-plan-approved\/","url_meta":{"origin":323648,"position":1},"title":"Continuation of Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme beyond 12th Plan approved","author":"Saba","date":"January 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by the Prime Minister has given its approval to continuation of Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) till the term of the 14th \u00a0Finance Commission i.e. 31.03.2020. Details: The Scheme would entail an annual allocation of Rs. 3,950 crore and a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/02\/dhc-sets-aside-cic-order-allowing-disclosure-of-exemption-sought-by-shri-ram-janmabhoomi-teerth-kshetra-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":323648,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC sets aside CIC order allowing disclosure of exemption sought by Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra for its donations","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe information pertaining to an assessee cannot be granted under the Right to Information Act, 2005 in view of Section 138(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":174554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/09\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-declaring-every-minister-public-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":323648,"position":3},"title":"Delhi HC sets aside CIC order declaring every minister a public authority","author":"Saba","date":"December 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Court\u00a0set aside an earlier order of the Central Information Commission declaring ministers in the Union government and all State Governments as public authorities under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Information Commissioner Prof.\u00a0M.\u00a0Sridhar\u00a0Acharyulu had also recommended in his decision that the ministers should\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":316562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":323648,"position":4},"title":"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons","author":"Arushi","date":"March 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe premise on which the petitioner is relying, the publishing of such newspaper article, cannot be taken as gospel truth.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/07\/cbi-not-totally-exempted-rti-act-disclosure-of-information-aiims-corruption-case-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323648,"position":5},"title":"CBI not totally exempted from RTI Act; Delhi High Court orders for disclosure of information in AIIMS corruption case","author":"Arunima","date":"February 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This is not a case where sensitive information has been collected by the CBI and the disclosure of which would be prejudicial for the officers involved. This is also not a case where information is so sensitive that it cannot be shared with the public at large.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}