{"id":323551,"date":"2024-06-04T14:00:13","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T08:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323551"},"modified":"2024-06-06T10:55:06","modified_gmt":"2024-06-06T05:25:06","slug":"meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Meghalaya High Court<\/span> In a criminal appeal challenging the decision of the Trial Court, whereby the convict was convicted for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and sentenced to undergo rigorous life imprisonment, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">S. Vaidyanathan., CJ.*<\/span>, and W. Diengdoh., JJ., partly allowed the appeal and modified the offence to fall within the ambit of the Exception 2 of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The convict was sentenced to three years imprisonment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 16-05-2002, the son of the deceased filed a complaint alleging that his father was murdered by the convict. According to the prosecution, the convict saw the deceased, who was the ex-husband of his wife, in his house and killed him with an axe. After commission of the crime, the convict surrendered himself to the police.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon completing the investigation, a charge sheet was filed. The Trial Court found the convict guilty and convicted him for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and sentenced to undergo rigorous life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.50,000.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The convict&#8217;s case was that offence was committed under grave and sudden provocation and the case squarely fell under first exception to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and he ought not to have been convicted for the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. It was also contended that except the evidence of his wife, there were no direct eyewitnesses produced by the Police to prove that the convict had killed the deceased and that he was implicated in this case based on his own confession statement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After considering arguments and evidence, the Court perused the convict&#8217;s confession statement. The Court on perusal of the wife&#8217;s statement, whereby it was stated that her ex-husband (deceased) visited her house and she offered him tea and as soon as convict returned from the paddy field there was a quarrel between him and the deceased, as a result of which, the deceased was attacked with an axe. Subsequently, the convict attempted to murder her, but she ran away from the spot and had hidden in a jungle. The Court also perused the statements of the wife&#8217;s sisters which fortified the wife&#8217;s statement. Further, the Court on perusal of the statements of the Doctors, who undertook the post-mortem of the deceased, said that coupled with the confession statement of the convict that he attacked the deceased with dao (axe) were duly proved \/ corroborated with the medical evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the Court held that the prosecution had sufficiently proven the convict&#8217;s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Regarding the question that whether the life imprisonment sentence imposed by the Trial Court was justified or not, the Court noted several contradictions between the statement of wife and her deposition before the Court. The Court noted that she had confessed in her statement that her husband\/ convict had seen her and deceased\/ ex-husband in compromising position and the deceased took out his pistol and pointed it towards the convict and convict ran away, however the deceased did not shoot. Hence, the Court said that such confession had created a suspicion, however, it was clear that wife had an illicit relationship with the deceased, raising the possibility of provocation for the accused and that there is every possibility for a prudent man to lose his temper \/ self-control, when he sees his wife with some other person in a naked and compromising position.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the Court was satisfied that the matter squarely fell under the provisions of Exception 2 of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Referring to legal precedent, the Court applied Exception 2 to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indian Penal Code<\/a>, which deals with culpable homicide not amounting to murder in cases of sudden provocation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court compared marriage to a bicycle with two wheels representing husband and wife, emphasizing the impact of marital issues on the family. The Court on referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhanwar Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Madhya Pradesh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ShGAxut8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2008) 16 SCC 657<\/a>, wherein, it was held that in order to bring the case within this ambit, there is every necessity to establish that the accused, in the garb of self-defence against the accused caused the death of the person, said that the convict, on noticing the presence of the deceased in his house caused the death of the deceased in order to safeguard his right over person (wife) without any premeditation or intention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the matter at hand fell within the ambit of Exception 2 to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> on the ground of it being unintentional and consequently, it is culpable homicide not amounting to murder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court modified the conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court and was sentenced under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years. The appeal was partially allowed and the convict was sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50,000\/- in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 5 months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Phot Khaii v. State of Meghalaya, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Wz16ZGae\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Megh 441<\/a>, Decided on: 24-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Judgment Authored by: Chief Justice S. Vaidyanathan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for Appellant:<\/span> Advocate Philemon Nongbri, Additional Advocate General N.D. Chullao, Advocate W.G.R Mihsil<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for Respondent:<\/span> AAG N.D.Chullai, GA R.Colney<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;On noticing the presence of the ex-husband (deceased) in his house, the husband caused the death of the deceased in order to safeguard his right over person (wife) without any premeditation or intention. The case fell within the ambit of Exception 2 to Section 300 of the IPC on the ground of it being unintentional and consequently, it is culpable homicide not amounting to murder.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":316898,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[19021,69451,69453,69452,2833,30765,31160],"class_list":["post-323551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-culpable-homicide-not-amounting-to-murder","tag-exception-2-to-section-300-ipc","tag-husbands-conviction-u-s-302-modified","tag-marital-infidelity","tag-Meghalaya_High_Court","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-section-304-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-04T08:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-06T05:25:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/\",\"name\":\"Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-04T08:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-06T05:25:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Meghalaya High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband | SCC Times","description":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","og_description":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-04T08:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-06T05:25:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","name":"Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-04T08:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-06T05:25:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Meghalaya High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":48751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/23\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-ipc-to-section-304-ii-ipc-for-the-accused-who-raped-an-8-year-old-girldeceased\/","url_meta":{"origin":323551,"position":0},"title":"Conviction modified from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 (II) IPC for the accused who raped an 8 year old girl(deceased)","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: While dealing with a death reference the Court cancelled the death sentence","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/madras-high-court-sets-aside-conviction-of-a-woman-who-set-her-minor-daughter-on-fire-for-offence-under-section-302-ipc-convicted-her-under\/","url_meta":{"origin":323551,"position":1},"title":"Madras High Court sets aside conviction of a woman who set her minor daughter on fire for offence under Section 302 IPC; Commutes Life sentence to 10 years RI","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court while dealing with the question that whether the mother had the intention to commit the murder of her daughter, set aside the conviction and sentence of the convict for the offence under Section 302 IPC and convicted her for offence under Section 304(1) IPC and sentenced to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":283521,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/delhi-high-court-modifies-conviction-from-section-302-to-section-304i-ipc-penal-code-legalnews-legalawareness-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":323551,"position":2},"title":"Absence of premeditation leads to Delhi High Court modifying murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder; Convict to be released","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Based on the weapon used for inflicting injuries to the deceased was a very heavy danda with nodes therein, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. However, it failed to appreciate the fact that the alleged offence was not committed by pre-meditation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":273095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/murder-convict-sentence-reduced-to-that-already-undergoe-less-than-life-imprisonment-imperssible-supreme-court-legal-research-criminal-law-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323551,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Can sentence of a murder convict be reduced to sentence already undergone which was less than life imprisonment?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a murder case, where the Madhya Pradesh High Court had reduced the sentence to sentence already undergone which was less than imprisonment for life, the bench of MR Shah* and Krishna Murari, JJ has held that such order is contrary to Section 302 IPC as there cannot\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/07\/ori-hc-conviction-for-murder-under-s-302-ipc-altered-to-s-304-part-i-on-grounds-of-lack-of-premeditation-and-motive\/","url_meta":{"origin":323551,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC |\u00a0Conviction for murder under S. 302 IPC altered to S. 304 Part-I on grounds of lack of premeditation and motive","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Pramath Patnaik and Dr A. K. Mishra JJ. modified the conviction given by the trial court and convicted the accused under Section 304 Part-I Penal Code, 1860.\u00a0 The brief facts of the case are that the accused was charged under Section 302 IPC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/07\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-in-light-of-direct-evidence-of-12-year-old-daughter-of-convict\/","url_meta":{"origin":323551,"position":5},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC\u00a0upheld in light of direct evidence of 12 year old daughter of convict","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was charged for murdering his wife by stabbing her with a knife. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323551\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}