{"id":323350,"date":"2024-06-01T09:00:44","date_gmt":"2024-06-01T03:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323350"},"modified":"2024-06-01T09:42:37","modified_gmt":"2024-06-01T04:12:37","slug":"2024-scc-vol-4-part-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","title":{"rendered":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> — Ss. 34<\/a> and 37<\/a> r\/w Ss. 2(4)<\/a> and 16<\/a> — Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act:<\/span> Challenge to jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act, under S. 34 on account of the 1983 Adhiniyam, post rendering of award is not permissible, when such objection is not raised in terms of S. 16(2) of the 1996 Act, [Sweta Construction v. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Co. Ltd., (2024) 4 SCC 722<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> — Ss. 34<\/a> and 37<\/a> r\/w Ss. 2(4)<\/a> and 16<\/a> — Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act:<\/span> Challenge to jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act, under S. 34 on account of the 1983 Adhiniyam, post rendering of award is not permissible, when such objection is not raised in terms of S. 16(2), [JMC Projects (India) Ltd. v. M.P. Road Development Corpn, (2024) 4 SCC 729<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — S. 9<\/a> — Jurisdiction:<\/span> Absolute necessity of determination of jurisdiction, at the earliest stage, emphasized. Illegal and erroneous assumption of jurisdiction renders any order as void ab initio, without such adjudication on question of jurisdiction, [Asma Lateef v. Shabbir Ahmad, (2024) 4 SCC 696<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Arts. 21<\/a>, 14<\/a> and 39-A<\/a> — Anticipatory bail — Scope of:<\/span> Law clarified re grant of extra-territorial transit or interim anticipatory bail, [Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka, (2024) 4 SCC 749<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Customs — Appeal — Appeal to Supreme Court:<\/span> Refusal to interfere, where matters stand concluded by findings of facts by authorities, [Commr. of Customs v. Adani Power Maharashtra Ltd, (2024) 4 SCC 825<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Customs Act, 1962<\/a> — S. 28(1)<\/a> — Extended period of limitation:<\/span> Conditions for applicability of extended period of limitation, summarized. Decision thereon, held, is a must for maintainability of show-cause notice, [Shashi Dhawal Hydraulics (P) Ltd. v. Commr. of Customs, (2024) 4 SCC 812<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> — S. 53<\/a> r\/w S. 52<\/a> and S. 30(2)(b)(ii)<\/a> — Set-off under IBC:<\/span> Law extensively surveyed and clarified re scope, ambit and permissibility of set-off under IBC, with reference to five kinds of set-off, namely : (a) statutory or legal set-off; (b) common law set-off; (c) equitable set-off; (d) contractual set-off; and (e) insolvency set-off — Law extensively surveyed and clarified. Insolvency set-off (i.e. one amongst the five kinds of set-off) under CIRP, not permissible. Binding effect of principle of pari passu implicitly contained within S. 53<\/a> r\/w S. 52<\/a> IBC<\/a>, clarified, [Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Aircel Ltd. & Dishnet Wireless Ltd. (Resolution Professional, (2024) 4 SCC 668<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 302<\/a>, 201<\/a>, 363<\/a> and 364<\/a> — Confession — Extra-judicial:<\/span> Principles summarized re when extra-judicial confession may be relied, [Kalinga v. State of Karnataka, (2024) 4 SCC 735<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 302<\/a>, 323<\/a> and 341<\/a> — Discharge — Remission of matter for holding trial — Whether warranted:<\/span> In absence of justification for such remission, because of prior enmity between parties and inconsistency between ocular and medical evidence, discharge, affirmed, [Ramalingam v. N. Viswanathan, (2024) 4 SCC 808<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 376<\/a> and 506<\/a> — Post marriage relationship with spouse, based on forced marriage alleged by complainant:<\/span> Ingredients of rape whether made out in case of post marriage relationship with spouse, based on forced marriage alleged by complainant, [Mohd. Julfukar v. State of Uttarakhand, (2024) 4 SCC 821<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 499<\/a> and 500<\/a> — Defamation — Quashing of prosecution — Circumstances envisaged:<\/span> Though every prosecution for defamation cannot be quashed on ground that offending allegations have been withdrawn, but in instant case, considering that not only offending statements were unconditionally withdrawn, but petitioner had also explained circumstances and context in which they were made, in exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 142<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>, prosecution directed to be quashed, [Tejashwi Prasad Yadav v. Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta, (2024) 4 SCC 731<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Securities, Markets and Exchanges — Securities — Nomination and Succession:<\/span> Nomination under Ss. 109-A<\/a> and 109-B<\/a> of the Companies Act, 1956<\/a>\/S. 72<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a> and\/or Bye-laws framed under S. 26 of the Depositories Act (NSDL Bye-laws 9.11.1 & 9.11.7), is subject to succession laws i.e. such nomination does not override testamentary or intestate succession, [Shakti Yezdani v. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, (2024) 4 SCC 642<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 — Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":323354,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[40741,39496,27634,30361,22064,36335],"class_list":["post-323350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-companies-act","tag-ibc","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-penal-code-1860"],"yoast_head":"\n2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-01T03:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-01T04:12:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\",\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-01T03:30:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-01T04:12:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times","description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-01T03:30:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-01T04:12:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","name":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp","datePublished":"2024-06-01T03:30:44+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-01T04:12:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/delhi-high-court-amendment-application-being-rejected-as-belated-does-not-constitute-interim-award-susceptible-to-challenge-under-s-34-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":323350,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court: Amendment application being rejected as ‘belated’ does not constitute interim award susceptible to challenge under S 34 Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (\u2018A&C Act') challenging an order passed wherein the arbitrator rejected an application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the statement of claim, Prateek Jalan, J. dismissed the petition as non-maintainable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/16\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-arbitral-award-by-arbitrator-de-jure-inability-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":323350,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside arbitral award passed by Arbitrator having de jure inability to pass the award","author":"Arunima","date":"June 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ineligibility of an Arbitrator goes to the root of his jurisdiction and the Arbitral Award cannot be considered as valid.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242186,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/cal-hc-s-116-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996-reiterating-independence-and-impartiality-of-the-arbitrator-court-appoints-former-justice-of-the-present-court-to-preside-over-as-the-sole-arbi\/","url_meta":{"origin":323350,"position":2},"title":"Cal HC | [S.11(6) Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996] Reiterating independence and impartiality of the Arbitrator, Court appoints former justice of the present court to preside over as the sole arbitrator","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J., while allowing the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointed former judge of the present High Court, Sahidullah Munshi as the sole arbitrator in the present matter. In the present application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/14\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-ss-34-and-5-merits-of-arbitral-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":323350,"position":3},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 5 \u2014 Merits of arbitral award","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Case Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 3 March 7, 2015 Part 1None of the grounds contained in S. 34(2)(a) deal with the merits of the decision rendered by an arbitral award, it is only when arbitral award is in conflict with public policy of India as per S. 34(2)(b)(ii), that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "SCC Weekly"","block_context":{"text":"SCC Weekly","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/supremecourtcases\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/18\/dhc-appoints-justice-arvind-sangwan-as-sole-arbitrator-in-petition-filed-by-dixon-technologies\/","url_meta":{"origin":323350,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC appoints Justice Arvind Sangwan as sole arbitrator in a petition filed by Dixon Technologies","author":"Arushi","date":"February 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre and would abide by its rules and regulations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/rajasthan-hc-appointed-arbitrator-bank-guarantee-forfeited-consideration-force-majeure-clause\/","url_meta":{"origin":323350,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court appoints sole arbitrator where performance security was forfeited without considering force majeure clause","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court exercised the powers conferred under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed, Jai Prakash Narayan Purohit, Retired Additional District Judge, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323350\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}