{"id":323237,"date":"2024-05-30T15:00:52","date_gmt":"2024-05-30T09:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323237"},"modified":"2024-05-30T15:02:48","modified_gmt":"2024-05-30T09:32:48","slug":"dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal filed against the judgment and order passed by the Bombay High Court, wherein the Court had confirmed the conviction order passed by the Trial Court, wherein the convict was convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000\/- with a default stipulation, the Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ujjal Bhuyan<\/span>, JJ. has held that the convict is guilty of committing the offence and that the guilt has been proved beyond all reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The wife of the convict was a police constable and lived in the police colony at Ambajogai. The convict was serving in the army. He had come home on leave. On 22-07-2002, she sustained burn injuries in the quarter where she was residing. According to the prosecution, she was subjected to cruelty by the convict and her brother-in-law. They tied her hands with a gamcha and her feet with a towel. Then the husband gagged her face. The brother-in-law got a match box and a bottle of kerosene. The husband poured the kerosene on her person and lit the matchstick. In the process, she got completely burnt. She was taken to the hospital by the neighbours where her dying declaration was recorded based on which a criminal case was registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561614\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">307<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561655\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">342<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On completion of investigation, a chargesheet was submitted by the police. The convict along with the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased were arrayed as accused. The brother-in-law was found to be a juvenile. Therefore, his case was segregated and sent to the Juvenile Justice Board.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court concluded that prosecution could not prove that the accused persons in furtherance of their common intention had subjected the deceased to harassment and cruelty and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> read with Section 34 thereof. The Trial Court also did not find any material against the father-in law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law for committing murder of the deceased. However, the Trial Court accepted the contents of both the dying declarations coupled with the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and held that death of the deceased was homicidal and not accidental. While acquitting the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law, the Trial Court held that prosecution had established beyond reasonable doubt that the convict along with his minor brother had in furtherance of their common intention committed murder of the deceased. Therefore, the Trial Court held the convict guilty of the offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of conviction and sentence, the convict preferred to appeal before the High Court. However, the High Court upheld the conviction order. Thus, the present appeal has been filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After taking note of the dying declaration, the Court noted that it clearly stated the role played by convict and the brother-in-law in the incident which led to her burn injuries. The contents of the dying declaration have been proved by the witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that though there are certain inconsistencies in their evidence, it is quite natural. Moreover, those are not material and do not affect the sub-stratum of the deceased&#8217;s statement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the incident had occurred on 22-07-2002 with the dying declaration recorded on the same day within a couple of hours whereas the evidence was tendered in court by the above witnesses after 5 years. As per the Court, such inconsistencies are bound to be there.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that identical statements by the material witnesses may create doubt about the credibility of such evidence, as being tutored. That being the position, the Court accepted the dying declaration of the deceased as a valid piece of evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench reiterated that once a dying declaration is found to be authentic inspiring confidence of the court, then the same can be relied upon and can be the sole basis for conviction without any corroboration. However, before accepting such a dying declaration, the court must be satisfied that it was rendered voluntarily, it is consistent and credible and that it is devoid of any tutoring. Once such a conclusion is reached, a great deal of sanctity is attached to a dying declaration and as said earlier, it can form the sole basis for conviction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench referred to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516774\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">32(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>, and examined various judicial pronouncements governing acceptance of dying declaration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the dying declaration of the deceased which has been proved in evidence. The attending doctor certified that the deceased could narrate her statement. The substance of the dying declaration is also borne out by the medical history of the patient recorded by the doctor which has also been proved in evidence. Further, though there are inconsistencies and improvements in the version of the prosecution witnesses, there is however convergence with the core of the narration of the deceased made in the dying declaration and the medical history recorded by the doctor. Thus, the evidence on record clearly establishes the guilt of the convict beyond all reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the convict has been on bail since 2016, thus directed him to surrender before the Trial Court within two weeks from the date of this judgment to carry out his sentence.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rajendra v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/iD3Trt9L\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 941<\/a>, decided on 15-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span> Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Sr. Adv., Vatsalya Vigya, AOR, Gautami Yadav, Adv., Pranjal Chapalgaonkar, Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Bharat Bagla, Adv., Sourav Singh, Adv., Aditya Krishna, Adv., Preet S. Phanse, Adv., Adarsh Dubey, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/iD3Trt9L\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 941<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Rajendra<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> State of Maharashtra<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span><br \/> Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Sr. Adv., Vatsalya Vigya, AOR, Gautami Yadav, Adv., Pranjal Chapalgaonkar, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Bharat Bagla, Adv., Sourav Singh, Adv., Aditya Krishna, Adv., Preet S. Phanse, Adv., Adarsh Dubey, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/17\/know-thy-judge-justice-ujjal-bhuyan-judge-of-supreme-court-of-india-career-notable-judgments\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Bhuyan-modified.jpg\" alt=\"Ujjal Bhuyan, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ujjal Bhuyan, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/25.-Oka-modified.png\" alt=\"Abhay S. Oka, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Abhay S. Oka, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Supreme Court noted that by its order dated 30-06-2016, the sentence was suspended, and bail was granted to the convict, as he had already undergone about nine years of sentence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":323244,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2569,69266,7931,3156,5363],"class_list":["post-323237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-burning-wife-alive","tag-dying-declaration","tag-murder","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upheld Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upheld Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-30T09:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-30T09:32:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/\",\"name\":\"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-30T09:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-30T09:32:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upheld Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Dying Declaration\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive | SCC Times","description":"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upheld Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration","og_description":"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upheld Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-30T09:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-30T09:32:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/","name":"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-30T09:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-30T09:32:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"[Dying Declaration] Supreme Court upheld Bombay HC order convicting a man for burning his wife alive","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Dying Declaration"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dying-declaration-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-hc-order-convicting-man-burning-wife-alive\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court upholds Bombay HC order convicting man for burning his wife alive; Finds no reason to doubt correctness of dying declaration"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Dying-Declaration.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":224364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/bom-hc-murder-convict-set-free-where-dying-declaration-had-deceaseds-thumb-impression-with-clear-ridges-despite-100-percent-burn-injuries\/","url_meta":{"origin":323237,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Murder convict set free where dying declaration had deceased&#8217;s thumb impression with clear ridges despite 100 percent burn injuries","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of P.N. Deshmukh and Pushpa V. Ganediwala, JJ., allowed a criminal appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for committing the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC and for the offence of cruelty to women\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/supreme-court-reproduces-11-factor-determine-dying-declaration-weightage\/","url_meta":{"origin":323237,"position":1},"title":"Dying Declaration cannot be the sole basis of conviction; Supreme Court reproduces 11 factors to determine its weightage","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is just not enough for the court to say that the dying declaration is reliable, as the accused is named in the dying declaration as the assailant.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"dying declaration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dying-declaration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dying-declaration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dying-declaration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dying-declaration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300474,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/01\/conviction-attempt-to-murder-can-sustained-injuries-simple-in-nature-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":323237,"position":2},"title":"Can conviction for attempt to murder sustain when injuries were very simple? Supreme Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court opined that the Trial Court, as well as, the Bombay High Court have rightly appreciated the evidence and convicted the convict for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 332 of the IPC","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"attempt to murder","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/attempt-to-murder.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/attempt-to-murder.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/attempt-to-murder.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/attempt-to-murder.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/dying-declaration-is-by-itself-sufficient-to-convict-an-accused-of-accusation-levelled-against-him-provided-dying-declaration-is-found-to-be-voluntary-truthful-and-hence-could-inspire-confidence-of\/","url_meta":{"origin":323237,"position":3},"title":"Dying declaration is by itself sufficient to convict an accused of accusation levelled against him provided dying declaration is found to be voluntary, truthful and hence, could inspire confidence of Court: Bom HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to a husband setting ablaze his wife, the Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ., made an observation with respect to dying declaration that, It is by itself sufficient to convict an accused for the accusation levelled\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/BomDying-Declarration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/BomDying-Declarration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/BomDying-Declarration.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/BomDying-Declarration.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/BomDying-Declarration.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/31\/acquittal-in-304b-by-supreme-court-accompanies-clutches-of-section-306-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":323237,"position":4},"title":"[Conviction for offence not charged] Acquittal in 304B by Supreme Court accompanies clutches of Section 306 of IPC","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court found the dying declaration to be genuine, true and not tainted with doubt or shrouded with mystery, reflecting the maker to have stated the true story.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Acquittal in 304B by Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Acquittal-in-304B-by-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Acquittal-in-304B-by-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Acquittal-in-304B-by-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Acquittal-in-304B-by-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/12\/chhattisgarh-hc-acquits-husband-accused-having-unnatural-sex-under-s-377-ipc-with-wife-leading-her-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":323237,"position":5},"title":"Chhattisgarh HC acquits husband accused of having unnatural sex with wife under S. 377 IPC leading to her death","author":"Editor","date":"February 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the age of wife is not below the age of 15 years then any sexual intercourse or sexual act by the husband with her wife cannot be termed as rape under the circumstances, as such absence of consent of wife for unnatural act loses its importance, therefore, the offence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323237\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}