{"id":323205,"date":"2024-05-29T18:00:11","date_gmt":"2024-05-29T12:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323205"},"modified":"2024-06-03T13:19:01","modified_gmt":"2024-06-03T07:49:01","slug":"dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a criminal petition filed under Article 227<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> read with Section 482<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘Cr.PC.’), challenging the order dated 14-07-2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03, Central-District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, (‘Additional Sessions Judge’), Navin Chawla*, J.<\/span>, while dismissing the present petition held that the words spoken by petitioner was referring to victim’s inner-wear accompanied by various other gestures. Those were clearly a matter of trial and same could not have been determined by the Trial Court at the stage of framing of the charge by discharging the petition. Therefore, The Additional Sessions Judge rightly intervened in the matter and had directed framing of charges under Sections 506<\/a>, 509<\/a>, 34<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’) against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/p>\n

In a present case, the FIR was filed for the offence under Sections 506<\/a>, 509<\/a> and 34<\/a> of IPC<\/a> on the complaint of the victim, who was a gymnastic trainee. Victim stated that on 02-09-2014, the petitioner being a gymnastic coach along with a co-accused mentally harassed her by making remarks about her inner wear, made fun of her by uttering words, made several gestures towards victim and continued to make fun of her in abusive slang which offended victim’s dignity and outraged the modesty. When the victim approached Chief Coach to file the complaint, the petitioner instead of apologizing for his conduct, threatened the victim by saying ‘<\/span>Tune galat aadmi se panga liya hai, tujhe to mai batunga’.<\/span><\/p>\n

The aggrieved victim then moved to the Metropolitan Magistrate, the said Court discharged the petitioner from charges under Sections 506<\/a>, 509<\/a>, 34<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>. The victim then challenged the decision of Metropolitan Magistrate through a Revision Petition. The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the said Revision Petition and held that there was a prima facie evidence to proceed under Sections 506<\/a>, 509<\/a>, 34<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> against the petitioner.. The Additional Sessions Judge directed for the Trial Court to proceed with the proceedings in accordance with law.<\/p>\n

Analysis:<\/p>\n

The Court after perusal of contentions submitted and facts, reiterated the judgment of the Supreme Court, State of Gujarat<\/span> v. Dilipsinh Kishorsinh Rao<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1294<\/a>, in which the Court said that, “what is required while considering framing of charge and discharge, is only the satisfaction of the court as to whether a prima facie case is made out against the accused to stand trial with the material available.”<\/span> The Court then was of the view that “<\/span>At the stage of framing charge\/considering the application filed by the accused seeking discharge, the detailed analysis of the evidence is not to be carried out by the Court. The only test to be applied is whether there is sufficient cause made out by the prosecution to proceed against the accused.”<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court while mentioning Section 509<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> pointed out that “intention”<\/span> considered as an essential ingredient while assessing insult done to outrage the modesty of any women. Such intention is to be assessed on the basis of numerous factors including the act itself, the context in which the action occurred, choice of words or gestures, surrounding circumstances, the background of the accused, the complainant’s perspective, etc.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that, victim already stated that the words spoken by the petitioner were referring to victim’s inner-wear and were accompanied with various gestures. These were clearly a matter of trial and same could not have been determined by the Trial Court at the stage of framing of the charges by discharging the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court further stated that, “The Additional Sessions Judge has, therefore, rightly intervened in the matter and has directed framing of charge under Sections 506<\/a>\/509<\/a>\/34<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> against the petitioner.”<\/span><\/p>\n

[Manoj Rana v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3906<\/a>, Order Dated: 24-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For Petitioner:<\/span> Shakti Chaturvedi, Advocate.<\/p>\n

For Respondents:<\/span> Shoaib Haider, APP; Akash Awana, Advocate, SI Mohd Intzar, PS IP Estate Delhi; Kunal Mittal, Shiv Dutt Kaushik, Advocates<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court stated that the only test to be applied at the stage of framing of the charge is whether there is sufficient cause made out by the prosecution to proceed against the accused.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[45350,18591,2543,69247,19831,69246,68653,33138,50918,4571],"class_list":["post-323205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-additional-sessions-judge","tag-code-of-criminal-procedure","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-detailed-analysis-of-evidence","tag-framing-of-charges","tag-gymnast","tag-justice-navin-chawla","tag-metropolitan-magistrate","tag-outraging-modesty","tag-trial"],"yoast_head":"\nDHC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence is not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence is not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-29T12:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-03T07:49:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/\",\"name\":\"DHC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-29T12:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-03T07:49:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence is not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC | SCC Times","description":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence is not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC","og_description":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence is not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-29T12:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-03T07:49:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/","name":"DHC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-29T12:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-03T07:49:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence is not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi High Court upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/29\/dhc-upholds-order-directing-framing-charges-u-s-506-509-34-ipc-scctimes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Detailed analysis of evidence not carried out while framing charge\u2019: Delhi HC upholds order directing framing of charges u\/s 506, 509 and 34 of IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":334618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-high-court-fresh-hearing-new-evidence-assault-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323205,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court directs fresh hearing on charge framing after FSL-verified video evidence surfaces","author":"Arunima","date":"November 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court remanded a case back to the Sessions Court to reconsider charges after new video evidence surfaced, challenging allegations of non-consensual relations as a fresh hearing was essential, as the initial framing of charges lacked access to the forensic report.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/25\/dhc-sets-aside-punishment-ticket-issued-to-central-jail-inmate-for-possessing-50-grams-tobacco-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323205,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside Punishment Ticket issued to Central Jail inmate for possessing 50 grams of tobacco","author":"Editor","date":"May 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court noted that there was a delay in forwarding the punishment inquiry to the Inspecting Judge, which contravened Rule 1273 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/ordinary-suit-cannot-be-transferred-to-commercial-court-by-district-and-sessions-judge-u-s-24-of-cpc-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323205,"position":2},"title":"Power to transfer ordinary suit to Commercial Court is not available to District and Sessions Judge u\/s 24 of CPC: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere the plaint is returned under Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, on its presentation before the appropriate Court of jurisdiction, the suit will be treated as a fresh suit, and will have to start de novo, and all proceedings before the earlier Court will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205471,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/non-seriousness-of-injuries-inflicted-by-the-accused-on-the-victim-should-not-be-the-sole-criteria-for-framing-charges-against-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":323205,"position":3},"title":"Non-seriousness of injuries inflicted by the accused on the victim should not be the sole criteria for framing charges against the accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A of the Jammu & Kashmir Criminal Procedure Code, 1889 (CrPC), whereby the order of framing of charge passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu, was challenged. The respondent\/complainant was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/trial-framing-of-charge-delhi-high-court-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":323205,"position":4},"title":"Does framing of charge means that accused is guilty or does it imply that accused may be guilty? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Expressing that, the revisional jurisdiction is not meant to test the waters of what might happen in the trial, Chandra Dhari Singh, J., held that at the stage of framing of charge, the judge is merely required to overview the evidence in order to find out whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245726,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/18\/culpable-homicide-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":323205,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | What is the most crucial element to be determined while finding a person guilty under attempted culpable homicide \u2013 S. 308 IPC? Vegetable seller beaten up on failing to provide money for conducting business outside Okhla Sabzi Mandi","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., while addressing an issue with respect to culpable homicide expressed that: \u201c\u2026crucial to determine whether the accused had intention or knowledge that the injuries inflicted on the victim would cause the death and as a result thereof the accused could be guilty of committing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323205\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}