{"id":323093,"date":"2024-05-28T17:00:41","date_gmt":"2024-05-28T11:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323093"},"modified":"2024-05-28T17:37:17","modified_gmt":"2024-05-28T12:07:17","slug":"supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/","title":{"rendered":"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In batch of writ petitions filed by Chartered Accountants challenging the validity of Clause 6 of Guidelines No.1 CA(7)\/02\/2008 dated 08-08-2008 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (&#8216;Institute&#8217;), under powers conferred by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chartered Accountants Act, 1949<\/a> ( &#8216;1949 Act&#8217; ) on the ground that the same is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.V. Nagarathna*<\/span> and Augustine George Masih, JJ. has held the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/abcaus.in\/icai\/councilguidelines2008.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Clause 6.0, Chapter VI of the impugned Guidelines<\/a> and its subsequent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icai.org\/post.html?post_id=10773\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">amendment<\/a> is valid and is not violative of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> as it is a reasonable restriction on the right to practice the profession by a Chartered Accountant and is protected or justifiable under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(6)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. However, the said clause 6.0, Chapter VI of the Guidelines and its subsequent amendment is deemed not to be given effect to till 01-04-2024.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>All proceedings initiated pursuant to the impugned Guidelines in respect of the writ petitioners and other similarly situated Chartered Accountants stand quashed.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Institute was given the liberty to enhance the specified number of audits that a Chartered Accountant can undertake under Section 44AB of the IT Act, 1961, if it deems fit.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The writ petitioners or any other member of the Institute were given the liberty to represent in the above context, which may be considered if the Institute intends to amend the Guidelines.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Chartered accountants are aggrieved by the mandatory ceiling limit imposed by Clause 6.0, Chapter VI of the said Guidelines on the number of tax audits that a Chartered Accountant can accept in a financial year under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559824\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">44-AB<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (&#8216;IT Act&#8217;). Clause 6.0, Chapter VI of Guidelines dated 08-08-2008 provides that a member of the Institute in practice shall not accept, in a financial year, more than the &#8220;specified number of tax audit assignments&#8221; under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559824\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">44-AB<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act, 1961<\/a>. It further provides that in the case of a firm of Chartered Accountants, the &#8220;specified number of tax audit assignments&#8221; shall be construed as the specified number of tax audit assignments for every partner of the firm.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Issues:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1. Whether the Council of the respondent Institute, under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a>, was competent to impose, by way of Guidelines, a numerical restriction on the maximum number of tax audits that could be accepted by a Chartered Accountant, under Section 44AB of the 1961 Act, in a Financial Year by way of a Guideline?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court perused the impugned Guideline dated 08-08-2008. After taking note of the object of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a>, the Court said that for quality of service rendered by the Chartered Accountant as a professional regulation of the profession is necessary and the Institute has been established for, such regulation of the profession.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to Section 22 of the Act, which defines &#8220;professional or other misconduct&#8221; to deem to include any act or omission provided in any of the Schedules. The Court noted that professional or other misconduct is defined by a deeming provision which implies that the Schedules which have enumerated various kinds of misconducts are not exhaustive or static. With the passage of decades and with the emerging varieties of misdemeanor, omissions or commissions of Chartered Accountants which are not in consonance with professional ethics and would amount to misconduct can be defined under the Schedules to ensure quality service being rendered by the Chartered Accountants as professionals. Therefore, the deeming provision would imply that with the passage of time, there could be newer misconducts which could be included in the Schedules in the form of regulations or Guidelines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Part II of the Second Schedule has delegated the power to the Council to make any regulation or Guideline, the breach of which would amount to a misconduct. This delegation to define and enumerate a misconduct by way of a regulation or a Guideline is a legislative device adopted by the Parliament to leave it to the discretion of the Council of the Institute to incorporate, define and insert a Guideline or a regulation, the breach of which would result in a misconduct committed by a Chartered Accountant. This is done to avoid the Parliament itself amending the Schedules to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a> every time a different type of misconduct is to be inserted to the Schedules by way of an amendment to the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court said that the regulation or Guideline issued by the Council, the breach of which would result in a professional misconduct, being a part of clause 1 of Part II of the Second Schedule have to be read as part and parcel of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a> itself. The delegation of powers to add newer types of misconducts by way of a regulation or a Guideline is neither excessive nor ultra vires under Section 22 of the 1949 Act which deems any breach of a regulation or Guideline as a misconduct as per Clause 1 of part II of Schedule II to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the Council of the Institute had the legal competence to frame the impugned Guideline restricting the number of tax audits that a Chartered Accountant could carry out which was initially thirty and later raised to forty-five and thereafter to sixty in an assessment year. Therefore, the Council of the Institute having the legal competence to frame the Guidelines, the breach of which would result in professional misconduct, in terms of clause 1 of Part II of the Second Schedule of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a> cannot be held to be vitiated on account of there being lack of competency or powers to frame the impugned Guideline by the Council.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2. Whether the restrictions imposed are unreasonable and therefore, violative of the right guaranteed to Chartered Accountants under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">3. Whether the restrictions imposed are arbitrary and illegal and therefore impermissible under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(1)(g) and (6)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> and reiterated that restrictions imposed by the State upon the freedom guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) cannot be justified on any ground outside Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19(6)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the Institute has placed reliance on the letter of CBDT and the CAG Report to satisfy the overwhelming need to place a ceiling limit as the best conceivable and practical measure at rectifying the targeted mischief.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court placed reliance on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sakhawant Ali<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Orissa<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5kDV3E7u\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1954) 2 SCC 758<\/a>, wherein it was held that disqualification of a legal practitioner from contesting elections did not prevent him from practising his profession of law and as such, the right to practice the profession of law under Article 19(1)(g) did not imply the existence of a fundamental right in any person to stand as a candidate for election to the municipality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court rejected the assertion of chartered accountants, that the undertaking of more than a specified number of tax audit assignments would not imperil the integrity and quality of the tax audit, because a reasonable possibility of the fall in quality owing to the surfeit of tax audit assignments exists. Trusting on the wisdom of the Institute, as it has acted on bona fide and genuine recommendations of the CAG and the CBDT, the Court found no fault in the endeavour of the Institute to eliminate the possibility of the conduct of tax audits in an insincere, unethical or unprofessional manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated that the thread of public interest has been visible in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a> since its inception. The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1949 Act<\/a> makes it clear that the Act was brought in to ensure that accountants all over the country, in discharge of their public duties, are governed by a central body that is not transitional.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After perusing the Wanchoo Committee Report, Finance Bill, 1984 and the accompanying Memorandum, the Court said that the intent of insertion of Section 44AB of the IT Act, 1961, was to facilitate the process of tax administration to the benefit of the public exchequer. The genesis of the opportunity to conduct tax audits was not regulation of a practice essential to the Chartered Accountant profession per se but rather to take assistance of auditors, in discharge of their public duties, for plugging tax leakage and thereby saving the time of the Assessment Officers on presentation of quality tax audit reports in a prescribed format. Therefore, it is for these intents and purposes, the privilege of conducting tax audits was extended to Chartered Accountants by creating a privilege to conduct such audits subject to reasonable restrictions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench further said that the idea of compulsory tax audits was neither an inherent part of the practice of a Chartered Accountant nor an essential function which could be claimed as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g). Through the extension of statutory privilege by Section 44AB, IT Act, 1961, a Chartered Accountant gets the chance to undertake tax audits under the said section. Thus, if the Parliament, at a certain future date, due to technological developments or any other reason, finds that expeditious and accurate assessments can be ensured without imposing on assessees the burden of additional requirement of tax audit report and thereby deletes Section 44AB from the IT Act, 1961, it could not be possibly argued that the right under Article 19(1)(g) has been abridged.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Shaji Poulose v. ICAI, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y21Lo8M9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 988<\/a>, decided on 17-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice B.V. Nagarathna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Ashwin Kumar D.S., Adv., Aditi Anil Dani, Adv., Rangasaran Mohan, Adv., Surbhi Mehta, AOR, Ishan Roy Chowdhury, Adv.,Tapesh Kumar Singh, Sr. Adv., Sukant Vikram, AOR,Prashant Bharadwaj, Adv., Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv.,Pai Amit, AOR, Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv., Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv., Nikhil Pahwa, Adv., Vanshika Dubey, Adv., Kushal Dube, Adv., Tathagata Dutta, Adv., P. Ashok, Adv.,Lochana S. Babu, Adv., Petitioner-in-person, Smarhar Singh, AOR, Jai Krishna Singh, Adv., Shweta Kumari, Adv., Manish K. Bishnoi, AOR, Narinder K Verma, Adv., Ila Shikhar Sheel, Adv., Nirmal Prasad, Adv., Khubaib Shakeel, Adv., Pallavi Singh, Adv.,Pallavii Singh, Adv., Arjun Garg, AOR, Shobhit Jain, Adv., Aakash Nandolia, Adv., Sagun Srivastava, Adv, Kriti Gupta, Adv., Preetesh Kapur, Sr. Adv., Ashmita Bisarya, Adv., Sanjay Dutt, Adv., Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, AOR, Renjith B. Marar, Adv., Lakshmi N. Kaimal, AOR, Rajkumar Pavothil, Adv., Arun Poomulli, Adv., Keshavraj Nair, Adv., Avinash Krishnakumar, Adv., Harsh Vardhan Shah Shyam, Adv, By Courts Motion, AOR, E. M. S. Anam, AOR, Anas Tanwir, AOR,Ebad Ur Rahman, Adv., Md. Asif Abbas, Adv., Masoom Rajsingh, Adv., Tanay Hegde, Adv.,Parijat Kishore, AOR, Beno Bencigar, Adv., Sanyat Lodha, AOR,Vishnu Mohan, Adv.,Ravi Raghunath, AOR,Goutham Shivshankar, AOR,B. Ramana Kumar, Adv., B Ramanakumar, Adv., K. Paari Vendhan, AOR,Raghunatha Sethupathy B, Adv., Ragunatha Sethupathy B., Adv., Ramya, Adv., Ramya A., Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv., Pramod Dayal, AOR, Nikunj Dayal, Adv., K M Natraj, A.S.G., Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv., Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Piyush Beriwal, Adv., Bhuvan Mishra, Adv., Shivank Pratap Singh, Adv., Prahlad Singh, Adv., Shashank Bajpai, Adv., Vatsal Joshi, Adv., Ashok Panigrahi, Adv., Swayam Prabhu Das, Adv., Diwakar Sharma, Adv., Amrish Kumar, AOR, Wills Mathews, Adv., Dhanesh M Nair, Adv., Paul John Edison, Adv., Devendra Kumar Tiwari, Adv., Rakesh Garg, Adv. ,Ashish Gopal Garg, Adv., Shweta Garg, AOR<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y21Lo8M9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 988<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Shaji Poulose<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> ICAI<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Ashwin Kumar D.S., Adv., Aditi Anil Dani, Adv., Rangasaran Mohan, Adv., Surbhi Mehta, AOR, Ishan Roy Chowdhury, Adv.,Tapesh Kumar Singh, Sr. Adv., Sukant Vikram, AOR,Prashant Bharadwaj, Adv., Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv.,Pai Amit, AOR, Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv., Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv., Nikhil Pahwa, Adv., Vanshika Dubey, Adv., Kushal Dube, Adv., Tathagata Dutta, Adv., P. Ashok, Adv.,Lochana S. Babu, Adv., Petitioner-in-person, Smarhar Singh, AOR, Jai Krishna Singh, Adv., Shweta Kumari, Adv., Manish K. Bishnoi, AOR, Narinder K Verma, Adv., Ila Shikhar Sheel, Adv., Nirmal Prasad, Adv., Khubaib Shakeel, Adv., Pallavi Singh, Adv.,Pallavii Singh, Adv., Arjun Garg, AOR, Shobhit Jain, Adv., Aakash Nandolia, Adv., Sagun Srivastava, Adv, Kriti Gupta, Adv., Preetesh Kapur, Sr. Adv., Ashmita Bisarya, Adv., Sanjay Dutt, Adv., Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, AOR, Renjith B. Marar, Adv., Lakshmi N. Kaimal, AOR, Rajkumar Pavothil, Adv., Arun Poomulli, Adv., Keshavraj Nair, Adv., Avinash Krishnakumar, Adv., Harsh Vardhan Shah Shyam, Adv, By Courts Motion, AOR, E. M. S. Anam, AOR, Anas Tanwir, AOR,Ebad Ur Rahman, Adv., Md. Asif Abbas, Adv., Masoom Rajsingh, Adv., Tanay Hegde, Adv.,Parijat Kishore, AOR, Beno Bencigar, Adv., Sanyat Lodha, AOR,Vishnu Mohan, Adv.,Ravi Raghunath, AOR,Goutham Shivshankar, AOR,B. Ramana Kumar, Adv., B Ramanakumar, Adv., K. Paari Vendhan, AOR,Raghunatha Sethupathy B, Adv., Ragunatha Sethupathy B., Adv., Ramya, Adv., Ramya A., Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv., Pramod Dayal, AOR, Nikunj Dayal, Adv., K M Natraj, A.S.G., Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv., Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Piyush Beriwal, Adv., Bhuvan Mishra, Adv., Shivank Pratap Singh, Adv., Prahlad Singh, Adv., Shashank Bajpai, Adv., Vatsal Joshi, Adv., Ashok Panigrahi, Adv., Swayam Prabhu Das, Adv., Diwakar Sharma, Adv., Amrish Kumar, AOR, Wills Mathews, Adv., Dhanesh M Nair, Adv., Paul John Edison, Adv., Devendra Kumar Tiwari, Adv., Rakesh Garg, Adv. ,Ashish Gopal Garg, Adv., Shweta Garg, AOR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-bv-nagarathna-igniting-hope-for-the-first-ever-woman-chief-justice-of-india-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/29.-nagarathna-modified.png\" alt=\"B.V. Nagarathna, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.V. Nagarathna, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Justice-Augustine-Gerorge.jpg\" alt=\"Augustine George Masih, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Augustine George Masih, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;One of the objects of the Chartered Accountants Act, is to ensure that the profession of the Chartered Accountant in the country maintains high professional ethics and renders quality service since Chartered Accountants are necessary for the efficient tax administration in the country&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":323115,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[30056,69200,30983,69196,5363,69195,31155,69197],"class_list":["post-323093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-chartered-accountants","tag-constitutionality-of-icai-guidelines","tag-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india","tag-section-44ab-of-it-act","tag-supreme-court","tag-tax-audit","tag-tax-audit-report","tag-wanchoo-committee-report"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Inside Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guideline limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court upheld guideline issued by ICAI limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court upheld guideline issued by ICAI limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-28T11:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-28T12:07:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/\",\"name\":\"Inside Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guideline limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-28T11:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-28T12:07:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court upheld guideline issued by ICAI limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Constitutionality of ICAI guideline\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Inside Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guideline limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court upheld guideline issued by ICAI limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year","og_description":"Supreme Court upheld guideline issued by ICAI limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-28T11:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-28T12:07:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/","name":"Inside Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guideline limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-28T11:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-28T12:07:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Supreme Court upheld guideline issued by ICAI limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Constitutionality of ICAI guideline"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/supreme-court-verdict-on-constitutionality-icai-guideline-limiting-number-tax-audits-chartered-accountants-per-year\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on Constitutionality of ICAI guidelines limiting number of tax audits by chartered accountants per year"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/03-45-_1_.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":327428,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/why-did-dhc-refuse-grant-icai-interim-injunction-against-netflix-staying-release-tribhuvan-mishra-ca-topper\/","url_meta":{"origin":323093,"position":0},"title":"Why did Delhi HC refuse to grant ICAI ad interim injunction against Netflix for staying release of series \u2018Tribhuvan Mishra CA Topper\u2019?","author":"Editor","date":"July 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is a series which appears to be more in the genre of comedy, and merely describes the main character as a topper in Chartered Accountancy Examination. It is neither intended nor can be perceived to be derogatory to the profession of Chartered Accountancy.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/05\/ker-hc-cas-right-to-practice-can-icai-refuse-to-recognize-retirement-of-ca-from-a-firm-hc-explains-legal-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":323093,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC| CAs Right to Practice: Can ICAI refuse to recognize retirement of CA from a firm? HC explains legal position","author":"Editor","date":"May 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: N.Nagaresh, J., pronounced a landmark judgment regarding right to practice of Chartered Accountants. The Bench held, \u201cThe decision of ICAI not to recognize and record the retirement of the petitioner from 'M\/s. R. Kumar and Associates' will therefore cause unnecessary and unwarranted hindrance to the professional advancement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":295815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/hp-high-court-upheld-nabard-guidelines-selection-auditors-cooperative-banks-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323093,"position":2},"title":"Selection of Auditors for Cooperative banks: Himachal Pradesh High Court upholds NABARD&#8217;s guidelines","author":"Editor","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court said that to assist the respective State Governments to choose the right persons to conduct statutory audits, the NABARD had issued the impugned letter prescribing broad guidelines","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/27\/guj-hc-sets-aside-icai-5-year-debarment-ca-mmcb-scam-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":323093,"position":3},"title":"Gujarat HC: ICAI&#8217;s proposal of 5 years debarment of CA in MMCB Scam case quashed for non-application of mind","author":"Editor","date":"November 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe report is bereft of independent findings on the report of the disciplinary committee by dealing the contentions\/submissions raised by the respondent. The Council has done merely a cut-paste job and produced the entire report of the disciplinary committee in its report.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ICAI 5-year debarment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ICAI-5-year-debarment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ICAI-5-year-debarment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ICAI-5-year-debarment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ICAI-5-year-debarment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/covid-19-icai-informs-sc-its-plan-to-postpone-ca-exams-to-november-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":323093,"position":4},"title":"COVID-19| SC disposes of the petition after ICAI postpones CA exams to November 2020","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has submitted before the Supreme Court that the May cycle exams, slated to be held in July-August amid the COVID-19 pandemic, have been postponed till November 2020. The Court hence disposed of the writ petition and said, \"In view of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280047,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/delhi-high-court-upholds-icais-suo-motu-power-to-initiate-disciplinary-proceedings-under-s-21-of-the-chartered-accountants-act-1949\/","url_meta":{"origin":323093,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds ICAI&#8217;s suo motu power to initiate disciplinary proceedings under S 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949","author":"Editor","date":"December 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 21 does empower the Institute to proceed suo motu and unhindered by the absence of a written complaint or allegation that may be submitted. A written complaint or allegation in writing cannot, in any manner, be understood to be a pre-requisite or a sine qua non for the initiation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323093"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323093\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323115"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}