{"id":323083,"date":"2024-05-28T15:00:42","date_gmt":"2024-05-28T09:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=323083"},"modified":"2024-05-28T15:01:32","modified_gmt":"2024-05-28T09:31:32","slug":"sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal against the Gauhati High Court&#8217;s decision, confirming the Trial Court&#8217;s decision convicting the present appellant persons (&#8216;convicted persons&#8217;), for offences punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abhay S. Oka*<\/span> and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned decisions. The Court acquitted the convicted persons of all the charges against them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The prosecution&#8217;s case was that one of the convicted persons picked up the deceased from his residence on the date of the incident and took him to Bhojkhowa Chapori Bazar and killed him by assaulting him with a sharp weapon. The convicted persons were found guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302, read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;). There were eight accused who were tried for the offence and out of the eight accused, the Trial Court convicted five. Vide, impugned decision, the High Court confirmed the conviction of four convicted persons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the High Court found only four convict persons to be guilty. The Court said that to apply Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, there must be an unlawful assembly, defined under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561401\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">141<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, as an assembly of five or more persons. The Court noted that the High Court did not hold that apart from the present convicted persons, others formed part of the unlawful assembly. Hence, the Court said that there was no unlawful assembly within the meaning of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561401\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">141<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and the convicted persons could not have been found guilty of the offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> with the aid of Section 149. The High Court did not modify the charge from Section 302, read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a>, read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Contradictions and Omissions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court explained that when a statement is made by a witness in his evidence before the Court which is inconsistent with what was in his statement recorded by the Police, there is a contradiction. When a prosecution witness whose statement under Section 161 (1) or Section 164 of the CrPC has been recorded states factual aspects before the Court which he has not stated in his prior statement recorded under Section 161 (1) or Section 164 of CrPC, it is said that there is an omission and there will be an omission if the witness has omitted to state a fact in his statement recorded by the Police, which he states before the Court in his evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">Further, the Court clarified that for an omission to amount to a contradiction, the explanation to Section 162 of the CrPC indicates that it may amount to contradiction when it is significant and relevant. Thus, every omission is not a contradiction. It becomes a contradiction provided it satisfies the test laid down in the explanation under Section 162. Once an omission becomes a contradiction, the procedure provided in Section 162(1) must be followed for contradicting witnesses in the cross-examination. On perusal of Section 162 (1), the Court noted that the witness must be contradicted in the manner provided under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">145<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>. The Court highlighted that this a rule of fairness, as the object of this requirement in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">145<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act<\/a> of confronting the witness by showing him the relevant part of his prior statement is to give the witness a chance to explain the contradiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It must be noted here that every contradiction or omission is not a ground to discredit the witness or to disbelieve his\/her testimony. A minor or trifle omission or contradiction brought on record is not sufficient to disbelieve the witness&#8217;s version. Only when there is a material contradiction or omission can the Court disbelieve the witness&#8217;s version either fully or partially. What is a material contradiction or omission depends upon the facts of each case.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court on perusal of the witness of the two sons of the deceased said that the evidence of one of the sons- <span style=\"\">that he witnessed the incident was fallacious. The Court noted that in the cross-examination of another son of the deceased, based on his prior statement recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC, he did not tell the police that at about 6.30 p.m. on the day of incident, one of the convicted persons returned with his father on a motorcycle and that followed them on his bicycle. It was also noted that it was not disclosed before the police that while coming back from a meeting on a bicycle, he saw in the flash of the headlight of a motorcycle that one of the convicted persons was running away and leaving the place with a weapon. The Court on perusal of the cross-examination of the Investigating Officer noted that the statement that he saw one of the convicted persons running away with the weapon in his hand in the flash of the motorcycle&#8217;s headlight was a very significant omission<\/span>,<span style=\"\"> which amounts to contradiction. The Court also noted from another prosecution witness&#8217;s statement that about eight to ten persons, including the present convicted persons and the acquitted accused were assaulting the deceased. The Court said that this witness was contradicted by suggestion that he did not tell the police that about eight to ten people were assaulting the deceased by surrounding him. Thus, the Court said that there were material omissions which affected the reliability of the witness.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court added that as far as evidence of assault on the deceased was concerned, there was no reliable evidence to show the involvement of the convicted persons. The prosecution&#8217;s theory of last seen together deserved to be rejected, therefore, the prosecution had failed to bring home the charge against the convicted persons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the Court allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned Judgments of the Trial Court and High Court to the extent to which the convicted persons were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, were hereby set aside and acquitted them of the charges against them.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">[Alauddin v. State of Assam, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NMbqtc1p\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 760<\/a>, Decided on: 03-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Abhay S. Oka<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellants:<\/span> Senior Advocate Siddhartha Dave, AOR Farrukh Rasheed, Advocate Seraj Ahmad, Advocate Jamti Ben Ao, Adv. Md. Ekhlakh Alam<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent:<\/span> AOR Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Pravir Choudhary, Adv. Reepak Kansal, Adv. Niharika, Adv. Abhishek Gaur<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NMbqtc1p\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 760<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Alauddin<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> State of Assam<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Appellants:<\/span><br \/> Senior Advocate Siddhartha Dave, AOR Farrukh Rasheed, Advocate Seraj Ahmad, Advocate Jamti Ben Ao, Adv. Md. Ekhlakh Alam<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent:<\/span><br \/> AOR Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Pravir Choudhary, Adv. Reepak Kansal, Adv. Niharika, Adv. Abhishek Gaur<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/25\/know-thy-judge-justice-abhay-oka-supreme-court-social-change-administrative-accountability-legal-knowledge-research-update-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/25.-Oka-modified.png\" alt=\"Abhay S. Oka, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abhay S. Oka, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/16.-Sanjiv_Khanna-modified.png\" alt=\"Sanjiv Khanna, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Ujjal Bhuyan, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The requirement under Section 145 of the Evidence Act, 1872 of confronting the witness by showing him the relevant part of his prior statement is to give the witness a chance to explain the contradiction and this is a rule of fairness.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":323088,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[69189,47247,69188,44635,69190,5363],"class_list":["post-323083","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-disbelieve-witness-on-material-contradiction","tag-justice-abhay-s-oka","tag-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses","tag-sc","tag-section-145-evidence-act-1872","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses says Court can disbelieve witness when there is material contradiction or omission\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses says Court can disbelieve witness when there is material contradiction or omission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-28T09:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-28T09:31:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-28T09:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-28T09:31:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses says Court can disbelieve witness when there is material contradiction or omission\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"acquittal on material omissions of witnesses\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses | SCC Times","description":"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses says Court can disbelieve witness when there is material contradiction or omission","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses","og_description":"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses says Court can disbelieve witness when there is material contradiction or omission","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-28T09:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-28T09:31:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/","name":"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-28T09:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-28T09:31:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"SC acquits 5 for offence u\/s 302 r\/w 149 on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses says Court can disbelieve witness when there is material contradiction or omission","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"acquittal on material omissions of witnesses"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/sc-acquits-offence-302-149-on-material-omissions-affecting-reliability-of-witnesses-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court acquits 5 in murder case on material omissions affecting reliability of witnesses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/acquittal-on-material-omissions-of-witnesses.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":334414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/05\/supreme-court-upholds-acquittal-of-three-in-28-year-old-murder-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":323083,"position":0},"title":"\u2018FIR not an encyclopedia, but can be used to corroborate or contradict informant\u2019; SC upholds acquittal of 3 in 28-year-old murder case","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe prime object of FIR, from the point of view of the informant is to set the criminal law in motion and from the point of the investigating authorities is to obtain information about the alleged activity to enable them to take suitable steps to trace and book the guilty.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"acquittal in murder case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/acquittal-in-murder-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/acquittal-in-murder-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/acquittal-in-murder-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/acquittal-in-murder-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/supreme-court-judgment-section-118-evidence-act-child-witness\/","url_meta":{"origin":323083,"position":1},"title":"Section 118 of Evidence Act | Child witness easily susceptible to tutoring; corroborating testimony not a rule but a measure of caution and prudence: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court did not deem it safe to base the conviction only on the testimony of child witness which did not inspire confidence and acquitted the appellant.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"judgment on section 118 of evidence act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/judgment-on-section-118-of-evidence-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/judgment-on-section-118-of-evidence-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/judgment-on-section-118-of-evidence-act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/judgment-on-section-118-of-evidence-act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350210,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/10\/2-accused-walk-free-in-43-year-old-murder-case-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":323083,"position":2},"title":"Two acquitted in 43-year-old murder case as SC slams suppression of evidence and unfair probe","author":"Editor","date":"June 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven the Police are under an obligation to carry out a fair investigation. This is a crucial aspect of fairness. The objective of the investigation is to ensure that the real culprits are brought to justice. The legal system must ensure that an innocent person is not punished.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"43-year-old murder case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/43-year-old-murder-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/43-year-old-murder-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/43-year-old-murder-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/43-year-old-murder-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/19\/sc-conviction-cannot-be-based-on-contradictory-statements-of-eyewitnesses-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":323083,"position":3},"title":"Never Reported Judgment| Conviction cannot be based on \u2018shifty and treacherous\u2019 statements of eyewitnesses [(1952) 2 SCC 186]","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on credibility of the witness.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"conviction contradictory statements eyewitness","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/conviction-contradictory-statements-eyewitness.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/conviction-contradictory-statements-eyewitness.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/conviction-contradictory-statements-eyewitness.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/conviction-contradictory-statements-eyewitness.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/13\/supreme-court-judgment-on-section-313-of-crpc-knowledge-of-material-circumstances-against-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":323083,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Failure to put material circumstances before accused amounts to serious irregularity&#8217;; Supreme Court set aside conviction in 27-year-old murder case","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court proceeded with the fact that the only circumstance appearing against the appellant was not put to him in the statement under Section 313 of CrPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"supreme court judgment on section 313 of crpc","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-judgment-on-section-313-of-crpc.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-judgment-on-section-313-of-crpc.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-judgment-on-section-313-of-crpc.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-judgment-on-section-313-of-crpc.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":323083,"position":5},"title":"&#8216;Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory&#8217;; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While dealing with an appeal in a Title suit for partition, Jharkhand High Court considered the admissibility of disputed relationship of a mother and son through witnesses lacking \u2018special means of knowledge\u2019 as required under Section 50 of the Evidence Act, 1872.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323083"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323083\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323088"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}