{"id":322663,"date":"2024-05-22T10:30:22","date_gmt":"2024-05-22T05:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=322663"},"modified":"2024-05-28T18:06:06","modified_gmt":"2024-05-28T12:36:06","slug":"sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> The five Judge Bench compromising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ., Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna, JJ. dismissed the review petitions of the verdict upholding the abrogation of the Article 370<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a> granting special status to the State of Jammu and Kashmir.<\/p>\n

The review petitions were filed against the judgment dated 11-12-2023 by the Awami National Conference, Jammu and Kashmir People Democratic Party and several other organisations and individuals. The Court had upheld the Union’s action of abrogating Article 370, and the restoration of statehood was directed for in the decision.<\/p>\n

While dismissing the review petitions, the Bench said that there was no error apparent on the face of the record and no case was made out for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Genesis of the Matter<\/p>\n

The President issued Constitutional Orders (‘CO’) 272 and 273 during the subsistence of a Proclamation under Article 356(1)(b), whereby, the Constitution of India<\/a> was applied to the State of Jammu and Kashmir abrogating Article 370. The Court upheld the Presidential Orders, while saying that the Presidential power under Article 356 to issue a Proclamation is of an exceptional nature which has wide ramifications on the autonomy of the State and the federal framework at large. It was held that the concurrence of the State Government was not required for the exercise power under Article 370(1)(d) to apply all provisions of the Constitution<\/a> to the State, the President securing the concurrence of the Union of India on behalf of the State Government was not mala fide.<\/p>\n

It was also held that Article 370 was a temporary Provision and was introduced to serve two purposes, firstly, the transitional purpose: to provide for an interim arrangement until the Constituent Assembly of the State was formed and could take a decision on the legislative competence of the Union on matters other than the ones stipulated in the Instrument of Accession, and ratify the Constitution<\/a>; and secondly, a temporary purpose- an interim arrangement in view of the special circumstances because of the war conditions in the State.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2024 SCC OnLine SC 1065<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
Awami National Conference<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
Union of India<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

For the petitioner:<\/span>
Advocate Shakti Kanta Pattanaik<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"Dr.
Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Sanjiv
Sanjiv Khanna, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"BR
BR Gavai, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Surya
Surya Kant, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"AS
AS Bopanna, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

While dismissing the review petitions, the Bench said that there was no error apparent on the face of the record and no case was made out for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":322668,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[20791,63465,20781,68969,63464,5363],"class_list":["post-322663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-article-370","tag-chief-justice-dy-chandrachud","tag-jammu-and-kashmir","tag-review-petition-article-370-abrogation-verdict","tag-state-governments-concurrence","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\",\"name\":\"SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Review petition Article 370\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times","description":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","og_description":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","name":"SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Review petition Article 370"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-reserves-verdict-on-article-370-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":322663,"position":0},"title":"Abrogation of Article 370 | Supreme Court Constitution Bench reserves verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The hearing of the matter began on 02-08-2023 and was concluded on 05-09-2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"article 370","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308910,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/11\/live-report-supreme-court-judgment-on-article-370-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":322663,"position":1},"title":"Article 370 Verdict | Supreme Court upholds abrogation of Special Status for Jammu and Kashmir","author":"Editor","date":"December 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Among the three judgments, one was authored by Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI on behalf of himself, BR Gavai and Surya Kant, JJ., while Justice Justice Kaul and Khanna, J. authored separate but concurring judgments.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":148461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/08\/supreme-court-seeks-centres-response-on-validity-of-the-special-status-of-jk-under-article-370\/","url_meta":{"origin":322663,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court seeks Centre’s response on validity of the special status of J&K under Article 370","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of JS Khehar, CJ and AK Goel and Dr. DY Chandrachud, JJ issued notice to the Centre seeking it's response on the validity of the special status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution. As per the petitioner Kumari Vijayalakshmi\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334824,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/11\/justice-sanjiv-khanna-takes-oath-51st-cji-supreme-court-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":322663,"position":3},"title":"Justice Sanjiv Khanna takes oath of office as 51st Chief Justice of India","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On 11-11-2024, President of India administered the oath of office to Justice Sanjiv Khanna who was elevated to the Supreme Court as Judge on 18-1-2019 and is due to retire on 13-5-2025, which means he will have a tenure of 6 months as Chief Justice of India.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Sanjiv Khanna takes oath","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/criticising-abrogation-art-370-whatsapp-status-wishing-independence-day-pakistan-not-offence-under-section-153-a-ipc-sc-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":322663,"position":4},"title":"Criticising abrogation of Art. 370 on WhatsApp status; wishing Independence Day to Pakistan not an offence under Section 153-A IPC: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNow, the time has come to enlighten and educate our police machinery on the concept of freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and the extent of reasonable restraint on their free speech and expression. They must be sensitised about the democratic values enshrined in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 153-A IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/critic-blog-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/critic-blog-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/critic-blog-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/critic-blog-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296498,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":322663,"position":5},"title":"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shehla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The hearing of the matter will begin from 02-08-2023. Here is all you need to know about the Article 370 of the Constitution case.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"article 370","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=322663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322663\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/322668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=322663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=322663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=322663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}