{"id":322663,"date":"2024-05-22T10:30:22","date_gmt":"2024-05-22T05:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=322663"},"modified":"2024-05-28T18:06:06","modified_gmt":"2024-05-28T12:36:06","slug":"sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> The five Judge Bench compromising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ., Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna, JJ. dismissed the review petitions of the verdict upholding the abrogation of the Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575208\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> granting special status to the State of Jammu and Kashmir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The review petitions were filed against the judgment dated 11-12-2023 by the Awami National Conference, Jammu and Kashmir People Democratic Party and several other organisations and individuals. The Court had upheld the Union&#8217;s action of abrogating Article 370, and the restoration of statehood was directed for in the decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While dismissing the review petitions, the Bench said that there was no error apparent on the face of the record and no case was made out for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002844032\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Supreme Court Rules, 2013<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Genesis of the Matter<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The President issued Constitutional Orders (&#8216;CO&#8217;) 272 and 273 during the subsistence of a Proclamation under Article 356(1)(b), whereby, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> was applied to the State of Jammu and Kashmir abrogating Article 370. The Court upheld the Presidential Orders, while saying that the Presidential power under Article 356 to issue a Proclamation is of an exceptional nature which has wide ramifications on the autonomy of the State and the federal framework at large. It was held that the concurrence of the State Government was not required for the exercise power under Article 370(1)(d) to apply all provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> to the State, the President securing the concurrence of the Union of India on behalf of the State Government was not mala fide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was also held that Article 370 was a temporary Provision and was introduced to serve two purposes, firstly, the transitional purpose: to provide for an interim arrangement until the Constituent Assembly of the State was formed and could take a decision on the legislative competence of the Union on matters other than the ones stipulated in the Instrument of Accession, and ratify the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>; and secondly, a temporary purpose- an interim arrangement in view of the special circumstances because of the war conditions in the State.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Awami National Conference v. Union of India, Review Petition (Civil) No 226 of 2024, Order Dated: 01-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Advocate Shakti Kanta Pattanaik<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8nH48nb4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1065<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Awami National Conference<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Union of India<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span><br \/> Advocate Shakti Kanta Pattanaik<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/4.-chandrachud-modified-1.png\" alt=\"Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/16.-Sanjiv_Khanna-modified.png\" alt=\"Sanjiv Khanna, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Sanjiv Khanna, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/17.-Gavai-modified.png\" alt=\"BR Gavai, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">BR Gavai, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/18.-Kant-modified-2048x2048.png\" alt=\"Surya Kant, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Surya Kant, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20.-A.S-Bopanna-modified.png\" alt=\"AS Bopanna, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">AS Bopanna, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">While dismissing the review petitions, the Bench said that there was no error apparent on the face of the record and no case was made out for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":322668,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[20791,63465,20781,68969,63464,5363],"class_list":["post-322663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-article-370","tag-chief-justice-dy-chandrachud","tag-jammu-and-kashmir","tag-review-petition-article-370-abrogation-verdict","tag-state-governments-concurrence","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":412,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 370\",\"Chief Justice DY Chandrachud\",\"Jammu and Kashmir\",\"Review petition Article 370 abrogation verdict\",\"State Government&#8217;s concurrence\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/\",\"name\":\"SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Review petition Article 370\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-online-editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times","description":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","og_description":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"headline":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","datePublished":"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/"},"wordCount":412,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","keywords":["Article 370","Chief Justice DY Chandrachud","Jammu and Kashmir","Review petition Article 370 abrogation verdict","State Government&#8217;s concurrence","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/","name":"SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-22T05:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-28T12:36:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Review petition Article 370"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sc-dismisses-review-petitions-verdict-upholding-abrogation-of-article-370\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No apparent error\u2019: SC dismisses review petitions of verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Review-petition-Article-370.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=322663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322663\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/322668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=322663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=322663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=322663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}