{"id":322658,"date":"2024-05-22T10:00:33","date_gmt":"2024-05-22T04:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=322658"},"modified":"2024-06-07T12:00:50","modified_gmt":"2024-06-07T06:30:50","slug":"income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","title":{"rendered":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal filed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Center (‘NAFC’), Challa Nagendra Prasad (Judicial Member) partly allowed the appeal and quashed the reassessment order made by the Income Tax Officer, ward 4(1), Gurgaon on the basis of notice issued under Section 148 of the Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer i.e. ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

A notice dated 30-03-2018 was issued under Section 148<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (‘the Act’) by the Assessing Officer for reopening of assessment. Subsequently, the reassessment process was handled by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer Income Tax officer (‘ITO’), Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, following the transfer of the case from the non-jurisdictional officer. This reassessment resulted in the inclusion of Rs. 12,50,000 as unexplained money due to cash deposits made during the financial year. The assessee’s case was that CTT(A) had grossly erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming the addition made by the Income Tax officer, amounting to Rs.12,50,000\/-on account of cash deposit made during the impugned financial year being treated as unexplained money. The assessee criticized the assessment order on various grounds, including violations of natural justice, improper initiation under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, and reliance on insufficient evidence.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n

The Tribunal noted that the notice under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a> dated 30-03-2018 was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), Delhi, to reopen the assessment of the assessee and subsequently, the case was transferred to ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, via a letter dated 12-11-2018 for the completion of the reassessment.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal said that at the time the notice under Section 148 of ITA was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, this officer did not have jurisdiction over the assessee as the jurisdiction was actually vested with ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon. Therefore, reopening the assessment by issuing the notice under Section 148 by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi was bad in law. The Tribunal said that there was no evidence on record to suggest that the Assessing Officer with proper jurisdiction over the assessee, that is ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, issued any notice under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal said that the assessment was completed under Sections 143(3) read with 147<\/a> of the Act<\/a> on 28-12-2018 by ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, based on the notice issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, who did not have valid jurisdiction to initiate the reassessment proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal relied on Nishi Kapoor<\/span> v. ITO<\/span>, 2019 SCC OnLine ITAT 2632<\/a>, wherein a similar issue was considered and the reassessment proceedings were quashed for invalid jurisdiction. The Court said that Nishi Kapoor (supra)<\/span> was applicable to the matter at hand, thus, the reassessment made by the ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon on the basis of notice issued under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a> by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer i.e. ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, was hereby quashed.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee’s appeal.<\/p>\n

[Saroj Sangwan v. ITO, 2024 SCC OnLine ITAT 443<\/a>, Order Dated: 17-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Appellant:<\/span> Advocate Swati Talwar<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Senior DR Om Parkash<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The reassessment notice was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, under Section 148 and lacked jurisdiction as the jurisdiction was with ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon. Hence, the subsequent assessment completed by ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, based on this notice was legally flawed.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":316075,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,13081,9013,47568,3686,68968,68967,19861],"class_list":["post-322658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-income-tax-act","tag-income-tax-appellate-tribunal","tag-income-tax-officer","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-lack-of-jurisdiction-of-assessing-officer","tag-reassessment-notice-u-s-148-income-tax-act","tag-section-148"],"yoast_head":"\nIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\\\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":535,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"Income Tax Act\",\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal\",\"Income Tax Officer\",\"Jurisdiction\",\"Lack of jurisdiction of Assessing Officer\",\"reassessment notice u\\\/s 148 Income Tax Act\",\"Section 148\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/\",\"name\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\\\/s 148 Income Tax Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/22\\\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\\\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times","description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs","og_description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs","datePublished":"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/"},"wordCount":535,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","keywords":["Appeal","Income Tax Act","Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","Income Tax Officer","Jurisdiction","Lack of jurisdiction of Assessing Officer","reassessment notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","Section 148"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","name":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=322658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=322658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=322658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=322658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}