{"id":322658,"date":"2024-05-22T10:00:33","date_gmt":"2024-05-22T04:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=322658"},"modified":"2024-06-07T12:00:50","modified_gmt":"2024-06-07T06:30:50","slug":"income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","title":{"rendered":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal filed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Center (‘NAFC’), Challa Nagendra Prasad (Judicial Member) partly allowed the appeal and quashed the reassessment order made by the Income Tax Officer, ward 4(1), Gurgaon on the basis of notice issued under Section 148 of the Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer i.e. ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

A notice dated 30-03-2018 was issued under Section 148<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (‘the Act’) by the Assessing Officer for reopening of assessment. Subsequently, the reassessment process was handled by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer Income Tax officer (‘ITO’), Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, following the transfer of the case from the non-jurisdictional officer. This reassessment resulted in the inclusion of Rs. 12,50,000 as unexplained money due to cash deposits made during the financial year. The assessee’s case was that CTT(A) had grossly erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming the addition made by the Income Tax officer, amounting to Rs.12,50,000\/-on account of cash deposit made during the impugned financial year being treated as unexplained money. The assessee criticized the assessment order on various grounds, including violations of natural justice, improper initiation under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, and reliance on insufficient evidence.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n

The Tribunal noted that the notice under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a> dated 30-03-2018 was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), Delhi, to reopen the assessment of the assessee and subsequently, the case was transferred to ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, via a letter dated 12-11-2018 for the completion of the reassessment.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal said that at the time the notice under Section 148 of ITA was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, this officer did not have jurisdiction over the assessee as the jurisdiction was actually vested with ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon. Therefore, reopening the assessment by issuing the notice under Section 148 by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi was bad in law. The Tribunal said that there was no evidence on record to suggest that the Assessing Officer with proper jurisdiction over the assessee, that is ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, issued any notice under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal said that the assessment was completed under Sections 143(3) read with 147<\/a> of the Act<\/a> on 28-12-2018 by ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, based on the notice issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, who did not have valid jurisdiction to initiate the reassessment proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal relied on Nishi Kapoor<\/span> v. ITO<\/span>, 2019 SCC OnLine ITAT 2632<\/a>, wherein a similar issue was considered and the reassessment proceedings were quashed for invalid jurisdiction. The Court said that Nishi Kapoor (supra)<\/span> was applicable to the matter at hand, thus, the reassessment made by the ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon on the basis of notice issued under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a> by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer i.e. ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, was hereby quashed.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee’s appeal.<\/p>\n

[Saroj Sangwan v. ITO, 2024 SCC OnLine ITAT 443<\/a>, Order Dated: 17-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Appellant:<\/span> Advocate Swati Talwar<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Senior DR Om Parkash<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The reassessment notice was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, under Section 148 and lacked jurisdiction as the jurisdiction was with ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon. Hence, the subsequent assessment completed by ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, based on this notice was legally flawed.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":316075,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,13081,9013,47568,3686,68968,68967,19861],"class_list":["post-322658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-income-tax-act","tag-income-tax-appellate-tribunal","tag-income-tax-officer","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-lack-of-jurisdiction-of-assessing-officer","tag-reassessment-notice-u-s-148-income-tax-act","tag-section-148"],"yoast_head":"\nIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\",\"name\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times","description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs","og_description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","name":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-22T04:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-07T06:30:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes reassessment due to lack of jurisdiction with Assessing Officer issuing notice u\/s 148 Income Tax Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":289103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/10\/it-act-reopening-of-assessment-unsustainable-in-law-lack-of-evidence-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":322658,"position":0},"title":"Reopening of the assessment is indemonstrable in law as reasons inserted in Section 147 IT Act were not considered as evidence: ITAT","author":"Editor","date":"April 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a trite law that the reasons, as recorded for reopening the reassessment, are to be examined on a standalone basis to determine the validity of proceedings under section 147 IT Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/21\/itat-quashes-reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation-s-148\/","url_meta":{"origin":322658,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Escaped income is below Rs 50 lakhs\u2019; ITAT quashes reassessment notice under S.148 Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation of 3 years","author":"Ekta","date":"October 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A notice under Section 148-A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee, stating that income had escaped assessment under the provisions of Section 147, regarding sale, purchase of properties and contractual receipts.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"reassessment notice barred by limitation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/itat-validity-of-the-order-u-s-1433-of-income-tax-act-passed-by-an-officer-without-jurisdiction-the-limitation-of-second-statutory-notice-discussed\/","url_meta":{"origin":322658,"position":2},"title":"ITAT| Validity of the order u\/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, passed by an officer without Jurisdiction & the Limitation of second Statutory notice, discussed","author":"Editor","date":"June 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akshat Malpani\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/assessment-officer-notice-initiation-re-assessment-proceedings-writ-petition-madhya-pradesh-high-court-alternative-remedy-available-admitted-examine-notice-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":322658,"position":3},"title":"Availability of Alternative Remedy is not an absolute Bar to challenge re-opening of assessment: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that alternative remedy is not absolute bar for examining conditions to issue reassessment notice and admitted the petitions for the final hearing.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/10\/del-hc-directed-fresh-adjudication-in-a-case-involving-mixed-question-of-fact-and-law-as-it-found-relevant-submissions-were-not-considered-by-ao\/","url_meta":{"origin":322658,"position":4},"title":"Del HC directs fresh adjudication in a case involving mixed question of fact and law, as it found relevant submissions were not considered by AO","author":"Editor","date":"June 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Manmohan and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ. disposed the petition and directed fresh adjudication as none of the submissions and contentions was considered by the Assessing Officer. The instant writ petition was filed challenging the impugned assessment order passed for the Assessment Year\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/07\/revenue-audit-objections-valid-ground-under-section-148-income-tax-act-reopening-assessment-allahabadhc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":322658,"position":5},"title":"‘Revenue Audit Objections a valid ground under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for reopening concluded assessment’: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no dispute regarding explanation given under Section 148 regarding information that can be relied upon by the Assessing Officer to reopen assessment of escaped income.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=322658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=322658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=322658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=322658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}